Gable Tostee

[cullennz]

Really? No one? Ever? In the entire History of the planet?

Once again this is creating a situation based on your belief and then measuring someone else against your fictitious ideal.

Probably yes. By its odd

Would you use it in that context

 

[cullennz]

I think the right verdict was reached btw

 

[Samson]

Oh, and can someone explain how the balcony was unsafe? It is larger then my kitchen and was furnished with chairs and what appeared to be a sunbed. The glass fence across it looks a least 4 feet high, so was a good height to prevent accidental falling off, so how is it dangerous?

Climbing over the protective fence may be dangerous, but that's like saying that my kitchen is dangerous because someone could get a knife out of the drawer and stab themselves with it.

Besides Knox there is the current Kayak Killer case, where weeks before she removed a plug for the kitten to play with. It was never replaced and boyfriend Viafore drowned. So of course Graswald is charged with murder 2.

 

[banquetbear]

He said she was going to hit him with a "metal object"

No one says that

Did you not read it?

...well, yeah I read it. But why are you telling me this? How does this relate to what I wrote?

I sincerely apologise. I was completely wrong. You were right. I'm a worm. An insect. Nay. Just filth in your presence.

Who am I to disagree?

Does that make you feel better?

Nope.

 

[cullennz]

...well, yeah I read it. But why are you telling me this? How does this relate to what I wrote?



Who am I to disagree?



Nope.

You were blatantly picking bits to critcise out of context.

Just thought I would help

 

[banquetbear]

You were blatantly picking bits to critcise out of context.

...are you going to start again with the saying stuff that I didn't say? You've just finished apologising for getting it wrong, but you are going to do it again?

Cite where I "blatantly picking bits to critcise out of context."

 

[cullennz]

...are you going to start again with the saying stuff that I didn't say? You've just finished apologising for getting it wrong, but you are going to do it again?

Cite where I "blatantly picking bits to critcise out of context."

Your post with all the irritating aaaaaaawwwwwsss

 

[banquetbear]

Your post with all the irritating aaaaaaawwwwwsss

...you really need a lesson on how to use a messageboard on the internet so that people can understand what you are saying.

You quoted me saying three different things.

If you only wanted to address one of the three things I was saying: then when you quote me, delete the other two things I said so I know that you are only talking about that one thing.

Does that make sense?

So instead of quoting me saying:

...well, yeah I read it. But why are you telling me this? How does this relate to what I wrote?



Who am I to disagree?



Nope.

Just quote me saying:

...well, yeah I read it. But why are you telling me this? How does this relate to what I wrote?

So I know that you are addressing this particular point, and not my entire post. Does that make sense? Otherwise I don't understand what the hell you are talking about.

So back to your response:

Your post with all the irritating aaaaaaawwwwwsss

Firstly: if you found the awwwwwwwwwwwws irritating: that does not upset me.

Secondly: you accuse me of "blatantly picking bits to critcise out of context." And to do this: you have blatantly picked something completely out of context to criticise me with. Now hopefully the irony of this is not lost on everyone. But ultimately I don't think the criticism is a fair one. But if you happen to think the criticism if fair: then please make a case for it.

 

[cullennz]

...you really need a lesson on how to use a messageboard on the internet so that people can understand what you are saying.

You quoted me saying three different things.

If you only wanted to address one of the three things I was saying: then when you quote me, delete the other two things I said so I know that you are only talking about that one thing.

Does that make sense?

So instead of quoting me saying:



Just quote me saying:



So I know that you are addressing this particular point, and not my entire post. Does that make sense? Otherwise I don't understand what the hell you are talking about.

So back to your response:



Firstly: if you found the awwwwwwwwwwwws irritating: that does not upset me.

Secondly: you accuse me of "blatantly picking bits to critcise out of context." And to do this: you have blatantly picked something completely out of context to criticise me with. Now hopefully the irony of this is not lost on everyone. But ultimately I don't think the criticism is a fair one. But if you happen to think the criticism if fair: then please make a case for it.

Can you not read your own post?

You took the bit about smiling and criticised it.

Please don't bother apologising to me.

I'm not as delicate

 

[banquetbear]

Can you not read your own post?

...well that lesson was a waste of time. Yes: I read the whole of my post. I also happened to write it! But you've just quoted the entirety of my last post: what part was this question addressing?

You took the bit about smiling and criticised it.

Why yes, yes I did. I was mocking him. I'm allowed to do that. Tostee isn't a member of these boards. Now what does my mocking Tostee have to do with metal objects? I still don't get it.

Please don't bother apologising to me.

I wouldn't dream of it.

I'm not as delicate

It isn't as if you haven't demanded apologies before on these boards. I'm just following your lead.

 

[cullennz]

Have you forgotten this

"Cite where I "blatantly picking bits to critcise out of context.""

 

[banquetbear]

Have you forgotten this

"Cite where I "blatantly picking bits to critcise out of context.""

...I wasn't criticising. I was mocking.

And what does this have to do with metal objects?

 

[cullennz]

...I wasn't criticising. I was mocking.

And what does this have to do with metal objects?

As I said.

I was helping you out criticising excerpts

 

[cullennz]

...I wasn't criticising. I was mocking.

And what does this have to do with metal objects?

As I said.

I was helping you out criticising excerpts.

 

[banquetbear]

As I said.

I was helping you out criticising excerpts

...I don't need your help. But if you want to criticise, feel free. I just don't see why you feel the need to quote me every time you want to criticise Tostee's writing. But whatever floats your boat.

 

[cullennz]

...I don't need your help. But if you want to criticise, feel free. I just don't see why you feel the need to quote me every time you want to criticise Tostee's writing. But whatever floats your boat.

Fair call.

I won't try to help you criticise excerpts out of context again.

Again I apologise.

And can only beg for a slither of mercy

 

[banquetbear]

Fair call.

I won't try to help you criticise excerpts out of context again.

Again I apologise.

And can only beg for a slither of mercy

...well you are wrong again: I wasn't criticising Tostee, I was mocking him, and I didn't take anything out of context, and you haven't made a case that I have.

 

[cullennz]

Think we will just have to agree to disagree. As I thought it was pretty obvious.

All good

 

[The Atheist]

It is clearly written by him,...

Your standard of evidence is appalling.

Why is it so clearly written by him? What possible evidence do you have that Eric Thomas aka Gable Tostee wrote that himself?

Considering he could have sold that as a 2 parter on 60 minutes or the other shows for a few hundred k it also shows he isn't that big a tosser

Mate, you are so far away from reality it's getting to the absurd stage.

It was posted on a bodybuilding forum and had been there to be copied forever. Nobody was going to pay $0-02 for it.

He decided to start his defence in public well before the trial, and it didn't do him any harm.

 

[cullennz]

Your standard of evidence is appalling.

Why is it so clearly written by him? What possible evidence do you have that Eric Thomas aka Gable Tostee wrote that himself?



Mate, you are so far away from reality it's getting to the absurd stage.

It was posted on a bodybuilding forum and had been there to be copied forever. Nobody was going to pay $0-02 for it.

He decided to start his defence in public well before the trial, and it didn't do him any harm.

You think he should have got manslaughter?

Or just saying he is a prick. Which we know