• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Fundraiser for women's shelter turns into teabagger hate parade

People, bear in mind you're talking to Bill Thompson, a poster so ridiculous he totally ignores any and all evidence you show him, crows about how no one has shown him any evidence, and then when everyone's given up trying to educate him, resorts to claiming it was all just a joke, or that it was his intention to spark a specific debate etc.
 
I don't think the data can really support any conclusions as to a specific religion being a culprit more than others.

That's been my only point (and something that the ICRW has explicitly pointed out as well).

There are many Muslim countries where there is a huge problem with child marriages. There are also many Muslim countries where there is not a problem with child marriages.

There are many non-Muslim countries where there is a huge problem with child marriages. There are also many non-Muslim countries where there is not a problem with child marriages.

Islam isn't the reason child marriages exist. Removing Islam isn't the solution that will eliminate child marriages. Anyone who thinks either or both of those statements is true has no idea about the true prevalence, extent, or root causes of child marriage worldwide, among multiple religions and cultures.
 
"Muslim charities"?. You cannot be serious. "Fund Raiser to help Homeless Woman". And we just accept it. Answer these questions:

  1. How many Muslim charities have been caught supporting terrorism?
  2. Among the ones that have been caught, how big are they compared to the others that have yet to be caught?
  3. How many of the remaining Muslim charities have lied about the issue and even sent out press releases trying to convince people that it is all a conspiracy?
  4. How many Christian or Jewish charities have been caught funding terrorism compared to the Muslim charities?
  5. How many of these charities have fessed up and admitted that supporting militant jihad is part of how they define a charity?
I have got answers to these. But I would rather you look it up for yourself. I have more questions, but lets start with these 5.
 
No no, don't talk about the people screaming at children as they enter a building. Don't talk about the video at all, in fact. Talk about this largely irrelevant thing that is more general and justifies my position in a more ephemeral sense. In fact, I'm going to make the thread entirely about this other, entirely unrelated thing. Just so long as we don't talk about the specifics of the video or the main topic of this thread at all.
 
"Muslim charities"?. You cannot be serious. "Fund Raiser to help Homeless Woman". And we just accept it. Answer these questions:

  1. How many Muslim charities have been caught supporting terrorism?
  2. Among the ones that have been caught, how big are they compared to the others that have yet to be caught?
  3. How many of the remaining Muslim charities have lied about the issue and even sent out press releases trying to convince people that it is all a conspiracy?
  4. How many Christian or Jewish charities have been caught funding terrorism compared to the Muslim charities?
  5. How many of these charities have fessed up and admitted that supporting militant jihad is part of how they define a charity?
I have got answers to these. But I would rather you look it up for yourself. I have more questions, but lets start with these 5.

educate us, please.
disprove your bigotry.
 
"Muslim charities"?. You cannot be serious. "Fund Raiser to help Homeless Woman". And we just accept it. Answer these questions:

  1. How many Muslim charities have been caught supporting terrorism?
  2. Among the ones that have been caught, how big are they compared to the others that have yet to be caught?
  3. How many of the remaining Muslim charities have lied about the issue and even sent out press releases trying to convince people that it is all a conspiracy?
  4. How many Christian or Jewish charities have been caught funding terrorism compared to the Muslim charities?
  5. How many of these charities have fessed up and admitted that supporting militant jihad is part of how they define a charity?
I have got answers to these. But I would rather you look it up for yourself. I have more questions, but lets start with these 5.

So do you have any supporting evidence indicating that this charity event was anything other than what it appears to be?
 
I have got answers to these. But I would rather you look it up for yourself. I have more questions, but lets start with these 5.

If you got those aswers from the same sources to which you have already linked in this thread, no, you have not.
Totally irrelevant, anyway. None of your answers make the dirtbags outside the police tape any less enemies of everything that America stands for, andrather verminous enemies at that.
 
This is a true statement, even if not for the reason you intrended.

Whatever the controversial Muslsim figures were doing there,the teatards were being barbaric without excuse.

They had good reason to protest, but not to get out of line themselves.
 
Can you please explain to me how shouts and chants of "Muhammed was a pervert, Muhammed was a fraud. Muhammed was a false prophet, " "you beat your wife and rape your children," "go back home," and "USA! USA!" are criticisms of Hezbollah and/or Malik Ali's statements?

I didn't say that they were right, just that such an event can and should expect to be protested. Protesters who said those things were also wrong.
 
I didn't say that they were right, just that such an event can and should expect to be protested. Protesters who said those things were also wrong.

Do you mean that women's shelter fundraisers should be protested, Islamic women's shelters should be protested, or fundraisers that feature one unpleasant and one questionable speaker should be protested?
 
They had good reason to protest, but not to get out of line themselves.
No, they had not. Nor had any of them much of a brain between their ears. About 90% of what they "know" about Islam is just not true.

They are morons and thugs, the lot of them.

They are also bad Americans. I dare say, some of them are probably as much a threat to this country as is al Qaeda. They both want to destroy America as it has been since I was a child.

Together, they could well succede, much to the hurt of all of mankind.
 
Do you mean that women's shelter fundraisers should be protested, Islamic women's shelters should be protested, or fundraisers that feature one unpleasant and one questionable speaker should be protested?

You answered your own question.

Organizations who feature advocates of terrorism should be protested, period.

Would you feel different if he was an advocate of Nazism or the KKK and/or speaking for a different cause. Would it be okay with you if the Republican Party, NFL or anyone else featured a Grand Wizard of the KKK as long as they didn't speak about their advocacy of lynching black people at that specific place? Do you honestly think that an organization who would promote and feature an advocate of lynching black people should not be protested so long as said advocate did not do so on their behalf?

If you do no think it would be okay for the NCAAP to feature a speaker who favors killing women, you should not think it is okay for a woman's group to feature a speaker who favors killing Jews.

If you have a problem with what I am saying, you are a moral failure.
 
No, they had not. Nor had any of them much of a brain between their ears. About 90% of what they "know" about Islam is just not true.

They are morons and thugs, the lot of them.

They are also bad Americans. I dare say, some of them are probably as much a threat to this country as is al Qaeda. They both want to destroy America as it has been since I was a child.

Together, they could well succede, much to the hurt of all of mankind.

Right, featuring advocates of terrorism against Jews is okay. I knew you didn't understand economics and spelling already, I didn't know you were such a bigot.
 
I am prepared to give the protesters the benefit of the doubt and assume they are not racist. They simply believe very strongly that women and children should be beaten.
 
I am prepared to give the protesters the benefit of the doubt and assume they are not racist. They simply believe very strongly that women and children should be beaten.

They were wrong too and perhaps deserved their own protesters.
 
If you have a problem with what I am saying, you are a moral failure.

Were it grounded in reality, I would have less a problem with it. All I got out of that rant was that he did not think that the state of israel should exist.

The rest of your objections are not that clearly supported by facts at hand.
 
Right, featuring advocates of terrorism against Jews is okay. I knew you didn't understand economics and spelling already, I didn't know you were such a bigot.
They were clearly against there being Muslims in America at all. They were wrong from jump street and they have no excuse. They are bad Americans.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom