Fun with "Pascal's Wager"

[ReFLeX]

God's nature is to be all-powerfull, therefore he "decides" based upon his nature, because God cannot change. (not changing is in this case not a limitation to power either) If Gods nature is to be all-powerfull and he "decides" based upon that nature, then He "decides" the more powerfull route because he must in order to be all-powerfull. The more powerfull route is not to break promises, not to sin, or not to not exist. Rather than breaking promises, sinning, or not existing.

You think a lot of the same things as Descartes, and as far as many of his theological points of view, he's in a tiny minority.

...you do not have the power to not exist. It's a little late for that, don't you think?

You can't just say, "this is not a limitation of power", you have to explain why it isn't.

 

[Iacchus]

So, how can one maintain consistency, in every single last detail, without the explicit power to do so?

 

[ReFLeX]

Why, by having the IMplicit power to do so!

...Iacchus, what the shell are you talking about?