From Rapture Ready

Scripture validates scripture but there is more evidence than even that. Have you even taken a look at some of the links I have referred others to?

There is much documented to validate the Bible. Here take a look http://www.alwaysbeready.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=99&Itemid=0
You may want to read a proper book since your "documented validation" is composed of completely false statements and semantic juggling. This is the best you can do?

Why don't you show the BEST(I want one, not ten or twenty) evidence for the existence of Jesus?
 
Kathy, I've looked at Charlie Campbell's Always Be Ready site many times at your request. The guy is a complete idiot, and does not in any way represent an atheist or skeptical way of thinking, because he's never been an atheist or a skeptic. He's a life-long believer who got mad at god for awhile before he got over it and started kissing his butt again. That doesn't make him an atheist, just an angry believer. Campbell also seems to think most atheists are as stupid as he is, if he thinks he can sway anyone with his so-called arguments and evidence.
 
Scripture validates scripture but there is more evidence than even that. Have you even taken a look at some of the links I have referred others to?

There is much documented to validate the Bible. Here take a look http://www.alwaysbeready.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=99&Itemid=0

Why should we bother? You've never read anything we've linked you to. You didn't even read books recommended to you. There is no good-faith assumption you'll bother to read our material, why should we read what you link? Do you think we'll hear or read something we don't already know or haven't heard before? I've yet to see one original argument from any believer. Ever.
 
Scripture validates scripture but there is more evidence than even that. Have you even taken a look at some of the links I have referred others to?

There is much documented to validate the Bible. Here take a look http://www.alwaysbeready.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=99&Itemid=0

No there is not "much documented to validate the Bible." At least there is not much documented at that website:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4674956

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

There is no shame in admitting that you are not the right person to try to convert us. Leave and send someone else or stay and open your mind. Anything else is pride on your part.
 
Scripture validates scripture but there is more evidence than even that.

Oddly enough, Grimm's Fairy Tales validates Grimm's Fairy Tales.


I wonder if you can see any problem with "I know scripture is true, because scripture says scripture is true?"

No? Yeah, it was a lot to hope for...
 
I wonder if you can see any problem with "I know scripture is true, because scripture says scripture is true?"

No? Yeah, it was a lot to hope for...

It's worse than that; the part of scripture that says that was not considered scripture when it was written. It was simply a letter talking ABOUT scripture.
 
Scripture validates scripture but there is more evidence than even that. Have you even taken a look at some of the links I have referred others to?

There is much documented to validate the Bible. Here take a look http://www.alwaysbeready.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=99&Itemid=0

And, as Ducky has pointed out, you are scarcely one to speak of this. When you lack the integrity to read the links provided by others, when you refuse to read the books that you have agreed to read, then make excuses for your deceit, why would we read your links?
 
And, as Ducky has pointed out, you are scarcely one to speak of this. When you lack the integrity to read the links provided by others, when you refuse to read the books that you have agreed to read, then make excuses for your deceit, why would we read your links?

I'm not yet convinced that she reads even her own links.
 
I'm not convinced she's even a "she." The writing style suggests an "it," in terms of responsiveness and other human signatures.


M.

I thought programmers followed the nautical convention and used "she" as the personal pronoun of choice.
E.g. "Arrr, matey, she's a fine looking godbot you have there"
 
I thought programmers followed the nautical convention and used "she" as the personal pronoun of choice.
E.g. "Arrr, matey, she's a fine looking godbot you have there"

Actually, they use male pronouns more often. Usually when referring to servers.

I use "it".
 
Actually, they use male pronouns more often. Usually when referring to servers.

I use "it".
<derail>

The Gender of a Computer

A language instructor was explaining to her class that in French, nouns unlike their English counterparts, are grammatically designated as masculine or feminine.

"House, in French, is feminine - la maison."
"Pencil, in French, is masculine - le crayon."

One puzzled student asked "What gender is computer?"

The teacher did not know, and the word wasn't in her French dictionary. So for fun she split the class into two groups appropriately enough, by gender and asked them to decide whether "computer" should be a masculine or feminine noun.

Both groups were required to give four reasons for their recommendation.

The men's group decided that computers should definitely be of the feminine gender (‘la computer’), because:
  1. No one but their creator understands their internal logic
  2. The native language they use to communicate with other computers is incomprehensible to everyone else
  3. Even the smallest mistakes are stored in long-term memory for possible later retrieval
  4. As soon as you make a commitment to one, you find yourself spending half your pay check on accessories for it
The women's group, however, concluded that computers should be masculine (‘le computer’) because:
  1. In order to get their attention, you have to turn them on
  2. They have a lot of data but they are still clueless
  3. They are supposed to help you solve problems, but half the time they ARE the problem
  4. As soon as you commit to one, you realize that if you'd waited a little longer, you could have gotten a better model
</derail>
 
Unfortunately for us, you probably will. :rolleyes:

Seriously, Kathy, you actually are enjoying the thought that people you don't know will suffer through seven years of literal Hell on Earth. That marks you as one sick puppy.

You, madam, are welcome to your Apocalypse. The rest of us will work to prevent it, thank you, even as you do whatever labor you can to bring it to us.
RT it is God's story not mine. He is testing the hearts of man through all of this and I just pray he will help others to know him and be known by him. Jesus still is the great miracle worker, and the best miracle is salvation through a changed heart. When we receive Christ he gives us a new heart and life. Life in the Spirit is so much better than anything this world can offer, and I am rapture ready, "Are You?"
 
RT it is God's story not mine. He is testing the hearts of man through all of this and I just pray he will help others to know him and be known by him. Jesus still is the great miracle worker, and the best miracle is salvation through a changed heart. When we receive Christ he gives us a new heart and life. Life in the Spirit is so much better than anything this world can offer, and I am rapture ready, "Are You?"


Since the beginning of humanity there have been thousands, perhaps tens of thousands of gods. Because we have exactly as much evidence to support the existence of any one of them as any other, every god is as likely, or not, to be the one true god. So the odds are severely stacked against you. If you've made a bad choice of which entity to worship, you know, tens of thousands of wrong ones versus a single correct pick, instead of going to Heaven, you'll spend eternity suffering in Hell. Are you ready for that, too?
 
RT it is God's story not mine.
No, it is yours KK, yours. It comes from yourself, that is why you know it so well and believe it to be true. It does not come from without, it only comes from within you brain. You just make it up to fit what you need.

Paul

:) :) :)
 
Okay Hokulele in the church of Corinth there were some big issues that Paul needed to address as they were getting a bit out of sinc as to the Holy Spirits leading and teaching. The women needed to be reminded to respect mens authority(and we still do today) which is the hierarchy that God has put in place. Jesus is the head of the church and men are right under him in authority and then women. We women can be deaconess's in a church but not a pastor as that is Gods way. What's important in Christianity is we learn to submit to the Lord and the way he ordaines things. The man is still called to be the head of the household and the spiritual leader for his family too.

Bollocks
 
... women needed to be reminded to respect mens authority(and we still do today) which is the hierarchy that God has put in place. Jesus is the head of the church and men are right under him in authority and then women.
IOW:

Earth grrrllz are easy
 

Back
Top Bottom