NightG1 said:
Evasion noted. Why don't you tell me?
You are correct that you did not answer, or even acknowledge, my question. Care to, or are you heading straight for .plonk.?
Interesting assertion, but just that. "Creator" was mentioned in DofL, remember? You think the FF were "humanists"? Bullsh*t; they would imo have a collective heart attack if they could see the US judiciary pronunciamentos happening today and over the last 45+- years.NightG1 said:
It doesn't matter what the Creator they were talking about actually was. They ascribe no authority, ask no benefit, and give no credit to this creator for any aspect of the governance of man. It could hardly be more clear that they were intending to create a nation governed by principles of humanism, and not religion.
Thanks, A.Andonyx said:
It seems to me as though he's saying either his argument, or the argument of the man being interviewed is NOT that American law and structure is rooted in a CHRISTIAN creator belief, but that there is evidence that it is rooted in SOME belief in a divine creator.
Er, some other interpretation of my posts is possible for anyone having 6th grade comprehension or better?
I remain amazed & amused.