• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Former Models for Donald Trump's Agency Say They Violated Immigration Rules...

Tony Stark

Philosopher
Joined
Nov 22, 2014
Messages
9,626
...and Worked Illegally

Not to mention Donald profited by cramming a bunch of them in an apartment and taking a ridiculous cut of their modeling fees for rent.

But the mogul's New York modeling agency, Trump Model Management, has profited from using foreign models who came to the United States on tourist visas that did not permit them to work here, according to three former Trump models, all noncitizens, who shared their stories with Mother Jones. Financial and immigration records included in a recent lawsuit filed by a fourth former Trump model show that she, too, worked for Trump's agency in the United States without a proper visa.

...

Two of the former Trump models said Trump's agency encouraged them to deceive customs officials about why they were visiting the United States and told them to lie on customs forms about where they intended to live. Anna said she received a specific instruction from a Trump agency representative: "If they ask you any questions, you're just here for meetings.

...

Models' apartments, as they're known in the industry, are dormitory-style quarters where agencies pack their talent into bunks, in some cases charging the models sky-high rent and pocketing a profit. According to the three former models, Trump Model Management housed its models in a two-floor, three-bedroom apartment in the East Village, near Tompkins Square Park. Mother Jones is withholding the address of the building, which is known in the neighborhood for its model tenants, to protect the privacy of the current residents.

When Blais lived in the apartment, she recalled, a Trump agency representative who served as a chaperone had a bedroom to herself on the ground floor of the building. A narrow flight of stairs led down to the basement, where the models lived in two small bedrooms that were crammed with bunk beds—two in one room, three in the other. An additional mattress was located in a common area near the stairs. At times, the apartment could be occupied by 11 or more people.

...

A detailed financial statement provided by Blais shows that Trump's agency charged her as much as $1,600 a month for a bunk in a room she shared with five others. Kate said she paid about $1,200 a month—"highway robbery," she called it. For comparison, in the summer of 2004, an entire studio apartment nearby was advertised at $1,375 a month.

http://m.motherjones.com/politics/2016/08/donald-trump-model-management-illegal-immigration
 
I assumed Trump had principled, long-held views on illegal immigration, so this is shocking news. Oh, wait, Mother Jones. Delete new information. Spend more time watching Fox News.
 
From the article:
"This is a system where they actually end up making money on the back of these foreign workers," Blais added. She noted that models can end up in debt to their agencies, once rent and numerous other fees are extracted.

This is known in the industry as "agency debt." Kate said her bookings never covered the cost of living in New York. After two months, she returned home. "I left indebted to them," she said, "and I never went back, and I never paid them back."
It's good to see that the Orangutan got stiffed for once too. :)

For those who didn't read the article: modeling agencies put their models in tiny apartments; in this case, 11 girls in 2 bedrooms; and charge outrageous rents. This girl got charged $1,800/month for that.
 
From the article:

It's good to see that the Orangutan got stiffed for once too. :)

For those who didn't read the article: modeling agencies put their models in tiny apartments; in this case, 11 girls in 2 bedrooms; and charge outrageous rents. This girl got charged $1,800/month for that.

What do you mean? He got everything they earned.
It's the same business model as pimping.
 
What do you mean? He got everything they earned.
It's the same business model as pimping.
It's not much of stiffing, but he wanted actually more than they earned. He invoiced her more in "rent" and other fees than she actually earned. The article says that's not quite uncommon in the modeling world.

Your comparison with pimping is quite apt. The article suggests that the main reason for not giving these girls visa is that it costs too much and is too much trouble for the agency. But there may well be an ulterior motive in that, because of their illegal status, they're easier to control and won't run away.
 
Your comparison with pimping is quite apt. The article suggests that the main reason for not giving these girls visa is that it costs too much and is too much trouble for the agency. But there may well be an ulterior motive in that, because of their illegal status, they're easier to control and won't run away.
There's pimping and then there's slavery*. If you take every penny (or more) from an "employee," that's slavery.

*To be clear, this is not intended to excuse pimps.
 
There's pimping and then there's slavery*. If you take every penny (or more) from an "employee," that's slavery.

*To be clear, this is not intended to excuse pimps.
You may have the wrong idea about how often pimps take everything from their girls.
 
You may have the wrong idea about how often pimps take everything from their girls.
No, I am absolutely certain that some, even most, are guilty of being slavers. I still think it's a distinction worth making given that being a pimp has at times been romanticized in western culture and it's possible that some of them at least provide some form of service/protection in exchange for taking most (as opposed to all) of their employees' earnings.

But thanks for the [pointless attempt at] correction.
 
It's not much of stiffing, but he wanted actually more than they earned. He invoiced her more in "rent" and other fees than she actually earned. The article says that's not quite uncommon in the modeling world.

Your comparison with pimping is quite apt. The article suggests that the main reason for not giving these girls visa is that it costs too much and is too much trouble for the agency. But there may well be an ulterior motive in that, because of their illegal status, they're easier to control and won't run away.

Yeah, it's the exact same business model sex traffickers around the world use.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom