Hi Moby7,
I will put in the post previous to 8den's reply that it makes the situation a little more clear.
I understood that 8den was claiming the WB and IMF were acting in a exploitative manner, and giving examples of former such activity to set context.
He does, to my mind, change his position midway through, which I'm fine with, though if it is so, then I would prefer it that he would state that he is doing this.
Nick
I will put in the post previous to 8den's reply that it makes the situation a little more clear.
Nick said:Well, I submit that it's clear that it is the case that the WB and IMF have been the principle architects of economic and cultural homogenisation for the relatively poorer countries that they have involved themselves with. The question being debated is as to whether it was their prior intention to do this, or whether the globalising effect that has occured was due to some other force.
8den said:Big first world countries exploiting the developing world for their own benefit. Gosh, thats a completely new phenomena never before seen in human history. Except for the Industrial revolution. And the Colonistation of Africa and India in the 19th century. Oh and the Spanish conquest of central America. Oh and the western expansion of the United States. And the entire British Empire. In fact any empire. Right back to the Romans.
Nick said:Yes, I agree. There was a hidden agenda behind the WB and IMFs so-called altruism. Though, of course, it's now not countries doing it, but relatively autonomous global orgs.
8den said:Stop I'm not agreeing with you in the slightest.
No Nick it's not that simple. The IMF and World Bank's policies are a mixture of botched economics, and western countries that dominate these organisations looking out for their vested interests.
Nick said:Well, I don't know, 8den. According to you, one moment they're evil colonialists raping the so-called "third world," and the next they're tragic philanthropists unable to do good through having their hands tied by trade regulations. I think I will stick to Synarchy in an attempt to at least introduce a little consistency here!
I understood that 8den was claiming the WB and IMF were acting in a exploitative manner, and giving examples of former such activity to set context.
He does, to my mind, change his position midway through, which I'm fine with, though if it is so, then I would prefer it that he would state that he is doing this.
Nick
Last edited: