Your sources don't count. Ceasar didn't exist.
My sources are independantly verifiable. Any source alone is just about worthless, it's their totality that makes it evidence.
Do you not understand the most basic concept of cultural anthropology? Do I really need to type up the opening chapter of an anthropology book?
The bible is a book with many different authors, and yes stories.
So you claim. Where is your evidence? I am willing to accept that they are written by different authors. But, why are they so disparate in the story they tell when they are supposedly talking about the same thing? When you look back on the historians of the past, they don't write about the same event in vastly different ways. You are destroying your own case.
But half the NT are letters. Actual letters written around 50AD.
Evidence?
I'd say that counts as a touch of history. How many of Ceasar's letters do we have in tact?
He was recorded by every single european and african culture of the time, and his image was printed on thousands of coins, and his statues, commissioned in his time and recorded as being him survive to this day.
Scratch taking you through cultural anthropology, we need to put you through a course in logic.
Unlike you, I am willing to insult people directly. You hide, and insult from the sidelines.
That's great, thanks for sharing. And now, back to the thread.
Oh, can't take a little derailing? Want to cry about it a little more? Want a tissue? Do you need me to wipe the drool from your chin?
You've totally missed my point
You said no other religions were oppressed. I gave you several instances off the top of my head.
Does your meager intellect not even allow you to recognize the words you wrote?
Read the above response to headscratcher.
I am responding to YOU though
It beats me as to why I have to type something out about 8 times before someone finally reads it close enough to understand.
Ho ho, you give us lessons in reading comprehension? Ironic. Really.
Either we are a slow lot here, or lazy. My money is on the latter. I see Loki actually gave my point a prod, which is more than I say for you, HS, or RD. Perhaps you would like to try again, I mean try again again.
Your point was an appeal to ignorance. Several people apparently exposed it. Now, you are getting defensive so as to take attention away from the fact that you know absolutely nothing about which you speak. Your attempt to hide behind a wall of veiled insults doesn't work. You see, I can ignore your verbal diarrhea and cut right to the point. You have been beaten, kiddy.
Sorry you feel that way. However after about your third insult in a single post-- both lips right here ( ! )
And I thought you had a thing against insults. Let us add hypocrisy to the long, damning list of character faults that you seem to be collecting.
I am sorry that you aren't able to grasp things on a higher level, but don't feel bad when poke fun at you. You're like JK, except you apparently believe the horse ◊◊◊◊ that you spout.
Go on, you can get it all out. We don't oppress freedom of speech here. Hell, you might even get some equally ignorant historical revisionist to agree with you! Then, the pangs in your stomach that you are no doubt feeling due to the level of ignorance this board has exposed you to have will subside, and you can feel vindicated. Because, no matter how wrong you are in every single conceivable way, somebody out there is just as wrong as you are, and you can revel in your stupidity.
K thx bye.
