For 'Scooby'

[Arkan_Wolfshade]

Well for a start, we've got a guy on here who doesn't seem to know what a 'right angle' is, supported by a group of people, none of whom seem to have noticed this or pointed it out.

This basic trigonometry was something I learned about in school so long ago I can't even remember when it was, but it must have been when I was about 7 or 8 years old - or maybe even younger.

To be interrogated by a poster with this weak a grasp on ... on... I can't think of a word for it - childhood?, is a farce.

Since you are apparently are that dense I shall explain in excruciating detail:
1) You posted this pic and alluded to the fact that it looked like a cross/crucifix.
2) A crucifix is formed by two straight lines intersecting each other perpendicularly. (perpendicular means that the angle on each side of the intersection is a right angle, aka 90 degrees)
3) Though a little tough to tell with the angle, it is a fair approximation of the debris in question:

4) I expressed shock that you were suprised to find debris in the building that contained right angles. I expressed this shock by asking you if you thought they hadn't used any right angles in the building of the WTC towers.

Now, about the speed of the collapses and why that bothers you, how about you answer.

 

[CHF]

Scooby, you are among the most gutless cowards I've ever. All talk and no action.

The only one that compares is Doug Herman of rense.com.

I challanged him to call engineers and even provided links and phone numbers. Like you, he didn't have the guts to pick up a phone.

You people are pathetic, shameless cowards.

 

[RAMS]

Scooby, you are among the most gutless cowards I've ever. All talk and no action.

The only one that compares is Doug Herman of rense.com.

I challanged him to call engineers and even provided links and phone numbers. Like you, he didn't have the guts to pick up a phone.

You people are pathetic, shameless cowards.

Scoob has not called or contacted by email FDNY with the contacts I have provided for him, either.

He seems to suffer from Tourettes, perhaps.

RAMS

 

[The Almond]

Scoob has not called or contacted by email FDNY with the contacts I have provided for him, either.

He seems to suffer from Tourettes, perhaps.

RAMS

Much like the legal quandaries LashL and you discussed, you should leave the medical classifications to doctors. Tourettes is not something you can diagnose over the internet.

 

[RAMS]

Much like the legal quandaries LashL and you discussed, you should leave the medical classifications to doctors. Tourettes is not something you can diagnose over the internet.

It was a joke.........

jeezzzzzzzz

Strange

RAMS

 

[The Almond]

It was a joke.........

jeezzzzzzzz

Strange

RAMS

My apologies, sarcasm does not transmit well over the internet.

 

[Belz...]

Ladies and Gentlemen - the truth movement. Presented with an opportunity to get information straight from the source, the answer is "I'm not going to pester them."

Sounds remarkably similar to psychics when they turn down the 1 million dollar challenge. "Oh, I'm not doing it for the money."

 

[Belz...]

Did Atta take 2 suitcases?

Allow me to repeat myself:

If there was no evidence that these people were the hijackers, you'd be jumping up and down, saying that the list of terrorists involved is obviously made up because there IS no evidence.

Now, there IS evidence, and to you it means it is planted ?

Perhaps you'd care to be somewhat more consistent in your standards of evidence.

Maybe it was your attitudes around here. If anybody does come in looking to learn, most of you attack and sour them toward staying.

If any of you guys came here with a genuine desire to know da twoof, and if you could be bothered to do some real research, I'm sure you'd be far more respected, no matter what your conclusions were.

 

[Belz...]

Come on Belz, you know i like to tickle you folks. Of course the "JREF-Land"-Statement was an exaggeration. Noticed the smilie? But i see the tendency...

Childlike, it would really, really make my day if ANY one of the truth movement said something like this:

"You know, 9/11 might not have been an inside job after all!"

So far, zilch.

Sorry if I offended you, but my statement stands.

 

[Belz...]

Sorry, I don't believe in suicide hijackers. Not four in one day, and not this crew. They liked strippers and booze and cocaine and gambling (at Abramoff's casino boat) far too much to take one (four) for the team. These guys were more like, oh, I dunno; double agent patsies.

Because double agent patsies would surely go against what you think is an unbreakable islam rule, while actual suicide bombers would not ?

I don't see how that follows. Lots of christians do stuff that is definitely non-christian, and they still expect the eternal bliss. Double agents sometimes do lots of illegal stuff in order to maintain their cover.

So why is it, suddenly so impossible to assume that these guys could have indulged themselves ?

 

[Belz...]

Well for a start, we've got a guy on here who doesn't seem to know what a 'right angle' is, supported by a group of people, none of whom seem to have noticed this or pointed it out.

So "we" are "dubious" because someone doesn't know what a right angle is ?

That's kinda strange.

This basic trigonometry was something I learned about in school so long ago I can't even remember when it was, but it must have been when I was about 7 or 8 years old - or maybe even younger.

So... the cross ISN'T at 90 degrees ?

 

[scooby]

So "we" are "dubious" because someone doesn't know what a right angle is ?

That's kinda strange.

So... the cross ISN'T at 90 degrees ?

No - 'for a start' implies a list, and that the following is only one item.

The obfustication regarding what at first appeared to be a 45 degree angled cut in steel found in the debris, as discussed - is but another.

 

[Augustine]

No - 'for a start' implies a list, and that the following is only one item.

The obfustication regarding what at first appeared to be a 45 degree angled cut in steel found in the debris, as discussed - is but another.

Obfustication?? Obfuscation?? Oh, what do they teach the kids today...the only obfuscating around here is of the scoob variety.

You know, when I do construction or building inspection, or forensic investigation, I try to (a) look at things from as many angles as possible; (b) look at things as closely and as clearly as possible, (c) put hands on if possible. It is stunning to me when I see scoob and the other woo-woos looking at a grainy photo and pronouncing themselves expert and "seeing things" that no one else can. Well, when I say "stunning", I mean

 

[PhantomWolf]

scooby and the gang off to solve another mystery....


...................................

 

[A W Smith]

I see angles. 90 degree angles

I have outlined the cross in red. The debris draping the left arm of the cross in pink. Is it the Shroud of Turin perhaps Scooby? And a section of background debris which blends in with the top of the cross in green. I see no Angles unless your talking 90 degree angles.

 

[Belz...]

No - 'for a start' implies a list, and that the following is only one item.

Good, good. Waiting for the rest.

The obfustication regarding what at first appeared...

Why does every truther react this way to dissent ? Have you NEVER been in a debate where people disagree with you ? Is this your first time ?

Disagreement <> Dishonesty.

It should just be one more indication that your interpretation of those pictures is NOT so obvious as you first thought.

... to be a 45 degree angled cut in steel found in the debris, as discussed - is but another.

45 Degree ? Where ? The torched one ?