Flight93 and "missing 3 minutes"

[beachnut]

wx?

wiskey xray

the weather, must be an air force acronym

but it is the FAA

 

[mcMike]

Mayby he wants to discuss the weather?
http://www.wx.com/

Ah. Sorry.
Don't ask about weather! Really. Winter is coming and that means PolarBears on the streets.

 

[jhunter1163]

I suspect that Mike is like me. He wants to inform himself so he can answer questions intelligently when the Troofers start their JAQing.

Not that they want to hear the answers...

 

[mcMike]

I suspect that Mike is like me. He wants to inform himself so he can answer questions intelligently when the Troofers start their JAQing.

Exactly! Thanks for understanding.

Actually I've been lurking here few for months already and I kinda understand why some repliers behaved like they did. There has been dozens of CT's asking same questions without hearing the anwsers (not this question though).
So I suppose one can get tired. However IMHO my question was decent without any suggestions to conspiracy so I would've expected a decent reply. JREF shouldn't lower themselves to level of LC-forums. Right?

 

[jhunter1163]

Mike:

I think it was a fair question. The problem is that sometimes it's hard to tell the difference between someone who's really asking a question and someone who wants to start a debate. After all, the Troofers claim to be "just asking questions."

I've had the same thing happen to me when I asked a question. It's not just you.

 

[gumboot]

I am little offended by many repliers in this thread. I don't understand why so many people attacks the person asking explanations? Because THAT was exactly what I was doing - NOT ASKING QUESTIONS but explanation.

I've been a little disappointed since I returned. I get the impression a lot of people here are at the end of their patience...

I detect much higher rates of aggressive and content-thin responses. Which, frankly, is fine and deserved when it's a sock troll like Docker... but I've seen a few times when new posters got hit with it straight up.

Sometimes it can be hard to remember that there are people out there who don't really know much about 9/11, but would look at evidence with a clear perspective. We don't want to chase those people away.

-Gumboot

 

[T.A.M.]

I agree, that many of us will jump in when the tone or wording of the question is ambiguous in terms of intent. You are right Mike, it is due to the many, many, CTers that come in here, with an initial post that seems benign, and just asking a question, but the minute you give them an answer, it spirals into a debate over speculation and opinion.

Perhaps we should have a "tips" sticky, with one of the tips being:

Tip #1: If you wish to ask a question that may cause contraversy, or may seem ambiguous, please state on what side of the 9/11 issues you fall.

Or something of that nature. I dunno, but it is quite easy to be ganged up on if the question seems to be hinting at deception by the USG.

TAM

 

[Oliver]

I've been a little disappointed since I returned. I get the impression a lot of people here are at the end of their patience... *snip*

It´s getting boring after everything collapsed and all that is left is Docker and his socks.