Lies. Zero problems with the FDR, you just say there were without presenting evidence; you point at the idiots at p4t who have not done anything as they "offer no theories".
Lie, there are many witnesses to the actual path.
Math, with the 11.2G wave your hand make up the numbers math of p4t, failure is complete.
http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/911pentagonflight77evidencesummary
If you fall for lies like CIT, what will keep you from falling for other fraud. CIT is a fraud, not recognizing that is self-critiquing.
The link you sent has went 404 I think. You need to link me to another site.
I gotta see these ´104 witnesses´.
On the
G-forces?
Watch the revised calculations done by Pilotsfor911truth. Hats off to them for correcting and admitting their mistake.
They go on to show the fallacies in the attempts by detractors to work out the G-forces themselves.
Forgive me if I use their words in the most part to explain this.
Calculator was only applicable to a one dimensional calculation and didn´t take into account the TWO dimensional calc necessary.
(02:24 minutes)
One dimensional = vertical velocity vector
Two dimensional= vertical AND horizontal velocity
= total velocity vector
Altitude, vertical speed and attitude data were left out of the attempted debunk.
This data was provided by NTSB.
This parabolic formula, based on false assumptions recorded a maximum g-force of 1.62 for the least challenging scenario from the VDOT Tower.
This figure was arrived at without taking into account the linear trends provided by the NTSB.
A follow-up attempted bunk of P4911T calculations taking these omitted parameters into consideration was attempted and arrived at a SUSTAINED 4g pull from the FDR altitude above the VDOT tower through to being level across the lawn.
Also during the ´debunker´ calculations:
Based on these calculations, there is absolutely no case to be made that
1)the obstacles are inconsistent with the impact of Flight 77
2)the FDR data is inconsistent with the impact of Flight 77, or
3)the FDR data is inconsistent with impacts to the obstacles themselves
The 1.62g derived was required for a full 4 seconds.
The highest recorded g-force taken from the FDR data was 1.75g for
1/8th OF A SECOND.
Averaging the g load over a 4 second duration taken from the CSV File
a total og 1.17gs is derived.
Certainly NOT 4gs over 4 seconds either!
The parabola scenario DOES present a possible descent through obstacles and topography yet it is NOT consistent with the NTSB provided data.
As has been pointed out to me on this thread the FDR translation of data done by Pilotsfor911Truth matches the government translations.
This also includes Altimeter and vertical speed data which MUST be included. Any attempts to debunk the accuracy of this data or that data is missing in the final seconds of the approach is thoroughly debunked and in some cases even accomodated to but still calculated in the following
thread.
06:48 minutes
3D animation program used, scaled to exact measurements and topography and obstacles in the immediate area and the path in question.
To accomodate debunkers, even though the data regarding height above the VDOT Tower is 699ft , P4911T lowered the plane´s altitude at this point to just above the tower.
The scale of the 3D animation was:
1cm = 100ft
An arc was drawn based on the pull-up needed.
The radius of the arc was calculated at 20.85 cm
The radius was then calculated in feet:
100 x 20.85 = 2085 ft.
A formula to calculate acceleration required using the arc:
a=v²/r
Speed according to FDR is 781f/s
V=781 f/s^2 = 609961
609961/2085 = 292.2 f/s^2
G Force = (292.2 f/s^2)/32 f/s^2 = 9.14 G
1G must be added for earth´s gravity so:
Total G Force Required = 10.14 G
Transport category aircraft are limited to 2.5 G Limit (maybe a little more) but 10.14 Gs??
Remember these calculations are for the LEAST challenging path from the VDOT Tower which remember has been lowered contradicting the FDR data.
If the FDR data is followed on altitude from the VDOT Tower following the same calculations, a 576.9 ft radius is derived.
Plotting this radius into the same formula:
781(f/s)² = 609,961
609,961/576.9 = 1057.3
1057.3/32 = 33G
33 + 1 = 34 Gs Required
THIS is the proper way to determine G loads in a TWO dimensional problem such as an aircraft pulling out of a dive.
Another argument put forward is that the plane was NOT on a level approach across the lawn and this would lessen the G forces required.
The damage caused to the building and explained by the ASCE report REQUIRES this trajectory. Does that mean the gatecam really IS a fake if we argue this point?
Would this not weaken the argument on the lateral forces exerted to a 94 metre length in 8/10ths of a second?
The ASCE report stated that the roof of floor showed that the plane had exerted an upward force on it.
The Perdue simulation based on the ASCE report:
If the data is followed to a tee as it HAS to be all the problems
and mathematical and physical IMPOSSIBILITIES had to be addressed by
this group of professional pilots.
They admitted to making mistakes and have rectified them.
P4911T calculations are based on the g-force REQUIRED from the official NTSB data taken from the FDR as regards the descent from the VDOT Tower on Columbia Pike.
A minimum of 10.14 Gs is REQUIRED. This was based on the LEAST difficult path and was not based on the FDR data but to accomodate
detractors.
If the official data is followed it requires a 34G manouevre from the FDR altimeter reading of 699ft agl from the VDOT Tower.
These numbers weren´t pulled out of the air. It´s there on the FDR.
The Altimeter readings also make it an IMPOSSIBILITY that damage was caused to obstacles such as the lightpoles, trailer and even the Pentagon facade itself.
