Flashes on north tower

[Oliver]

I give you an idea what people are able to see
in a picture or video with a littlebit of fantasy:

​

 

[twinstead]

Because it specifically requests that the viewer does not take it as fact and do their own research.

Well, that's the problem then, because that's exactly what's NOT going to happen. So many things in that documentary are incorrect; it has the effect of convincing people there was a conspiracy based on inaccuracies and even lies.

Many folks simply start believing in a conspiracy theory based on that and other similarly inaccurate films, no questions asked, no research necessary.

THAT'S the problem I have with it.

 

[negativ]

I admit my first thought was glass falling, but then I heard alex jones in my brain saying "its bombs, its bombs"

There are doctors and medications that can help you with this.

 

[MRC_Hans]

Go to 7:50 in this video and watch the sky lobby on the north tower. about 20 stories down from impact zone.

You can clearly see small flashes that increase in size

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5370762387415552903&q=bob+and+bri

I see two flashes at different hights, consistent with something falling.

What it is?

How should I know? That particular part of the film has a rasolution on the face of the tower of about ten feet per pixel. Guesses?

Sunlight reflecting in some falling object(s).
Sunflashes from something else being reflected from the windows of the tower.
People inside the tower taking pictures with flash.
Reflections of people in nearby buildings taking pictures with flash.
Something falling and exploding.
Something exploding inside the tower.

Why? What is your point? Are you saying that these firecracker-size flashes prove the tower was blown up? Are you saying that an impacting airliner could not bring the towers down, but a few tiny detonations, if that's what they are ......

nah, I refuse to think that's what you're saying.

... So, what are you saying?

Hans

 

[Skibum]

That's funny because BBC even admits its own bias.

But notice he said BBc not BBC, stop misinterpreting what he says.

 

[MRC_Hans]

I only saw that video for the first time just now. I admit my first thought was glass falling, but then I heard alex jones in my brain saying "its bombs, its bombs"

See my sig.

 

[geni]

I get the feeling if I presented a video showing a team of black masked delta force, firing davy crockett nukes at the towers, I would be told its a reflection.

Considering the amount of radition they kick out the denitation of a M-388 would have been fairly obvious. The death of anyone within 400 meters of the device would be fairly easy to spot.

 

[firecoins]

When was the last time you saw sunlight reflecting off glass falling 1300 feet?

The last time I looked at the twin towers on 9/11 . Before 9/11 the glass was stationary but glass doesn't lose it ability to reflect light due to movement. Nothing does.

 

[Docker]

The last time I looked at the twin towers on 9/11 . Before 9/11 the glass was stationary but glass doesn't lose it ability to reflect light due to movement. Nothing does.

Why was it falling?

 

[Docker]

The last time I looked at the twin towers on 9/11 . Before 9/11 the glass was stationary but glass doesn't lose it ability to reflect light due to movement. Nothing does.

When did I claim that, straw dude?

 

[kookbreaker]

Why was it falling?

You were aware of the events of that day, yes?

This is why you get called a troll.

 

[realitybites]

Why was it falling?

Please tell me that's meant as a joke....

 

[kookbreaker]

When did I claim that, straw dude?

"When was the last time you saw sunlight reflecting off glass falling 1300 feet? " -Docker

You're welcome.

 

[Docker]

That's funny because BBC even admits its own bias.

Your life is getting emptier since you immediately put "BBC biased" into google just to get one over me. Very, very sad.

 

[Docker]

You were aware of the events of that day, yes?

This is why you get called a troll.

No idiot, i asked firecoins why the glass was falling before 9/11

And I never claimed it didn't reflect. I said when was the last time he saw it.

 

[Skibum]

Your life is getting emptier since you immediately put "BBC biased" into google just to get one over me. Very, very sad.

Or perhaps he recalled an article he read from 4 days ago.

 

[Docker]

Or perhaps he recalled an article he read from 4 days ago.

Doubtful.

 

[snagswolf]

I get the feeling if I presented a video showing a team of black masked delta force, firing davy crockett nukes at the towers, I would be told its a reflection.

Why do the 9/11 kooks always make claims like this?

Because what they're really saying is, "If I gave you real evidence you wouldn't believe it."

 

[realitybites]

Your life is getting emptier since you immediately put "BBC biased" into google just to get one over me. Very, very sad.

I'm sorry if you're not aware of news that comes out of your neck of the woods.

 

[kookbreaker]

No idiot, i asked firecoins why the glass was falling before 9/11

Which he never said:

"The last time I looked at the twin towers on 9/11 . Before 9/11 the glass was stationary but glass doesn't lose it ability to reflect light due to movement. Nothing does." -Firecoins.

And I never claimed it didn't reflect. I said when was the last time he saw it.[/QUOTE]

"When was the last time you saw sunlight reflecting off glass falling 1300 feet? "

The implication is pretty obvious: You seem to think that sunlight reflecting off the glass would not happen when the glass is falling. You were wrong and simply don't want to own up to it.