Fire can't melt Steel?

John Blonn said:
I could go on forever. This was a disaster of a movie - its claims are highly dubious and the film has no merit.
Click to expand...
And their first star witness Edward places the plane on the south side of the citgo. Guess the dim lyte bulb didn't catch that kodak moment.

Plane tickets for two - $400.00
Hotel for two - $200.00
Barbecue supplies and witness bribes - $1000.00
Witnesses debunking film - PRICELESS
 
Miragememories said:
The witness were good.

The question was simple.

The memory required was straight forward.

They were at the Citgo station...you weren't. It's not hard to remember which direction they looked to see the plane.

They were Pentagon cops which only adds to their credibility.

I agree the producers went too far claiming a flyover based on nothing but speculation.

Regardless, the witness testimony was good.

MM
Click to expand...
Why did Sgt. Lagasse go through the entire interview "remembering" everything (including the plane impact) perfectly from the wrong spot? Why didn't he remember he was in a different spot until dim bulb coached him?
 
gumboot said:
We've all heard the claim...

But in the local news:



Remember this was hay. Just hay.

-Gumboot
Click to expand...

IT was the Moo world Order, the cows the hay was meant to feed must have planted the thermite to burn the corrugated steel with zinc coating, either that or the metal was Corrugated steel with thermite painted on it.
It is a plan the cows have so they can take over forcing the farmer to buy more hay, while the farmer is gone for the hay the Cows gain control of the farm, the farm then the world.
Seriously though steel that thin will not melt, it will burn to Black iron oxide.
 
~enigma~ said:
Why did Sgt. Lagasse go through the entire interview "remembering" everything (including the plane impact) perfectly from the wrong spot? Why didn't he remember he was in a different spot until dim bulb coached him?
Click to expand...


Also I wonder if that was an official govt motor vehicle shown in the interview. was he off duty? On duty? why spend so much time doing an interview while you are on duty and risk being fired or reprimanded for not continuing your patrol? or if off duty what was he doing with a govt vehicle on personal time?

From
http://home.planet.nl/~reijd050/JoeR/911_dump_of_Pentagon_quotes.html
Sgt. William Lagasse in an email conversation with "my good friend" Dick Eastman:
"Dear Sir rest assured it was a Boeing 757 that flew into the building that day, I was on duty as a pentagon police sgt. I was refueling my vehicle at the barraks k gas station that day adjacent to the aircrafts flight path. It was close enough that i could see the windows had the shades pulled down, it struck several light poles next to rt 27 and struck a trailer used to store construction equipment for the renovation of the pentagon that was to the right of the fueselage impact point. The fact that you are insinuating that this was staged and a fraud is unbelievable. You ask were the debris is...well it was in the building..I saw it everywhere. I swear to god you people piss me off to no end. I invite you and you come down and I will walk you through it step by step. I have more than a few hours in general aviation aircraft and can identify commercial airliners. Have you ever seen photos of other aircraft accident photos...there usually isnt huge amounts of debris left...how much did you see from the WTC?...are those fake aircraft flying into the building. I know that this will make no diffrence to you because to even have a websight like this you are obviously a diffrent sort of thinker."
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Crazy Chainsaw said:
IT was the Moo world Order,
Click to expand...
Well we know who's in charge of that!

mooAndOink.jpg
 
mailman said:
[qimg]http://images.tvnz.co.nz/tvnz_images/news2007/accidents_emergencies/hayfire_250207_232.jpg[/qimg]
Here is an image of the shed that was on fire...notice how the support structures are still standing while the corrogated iron covering has disappreared?

The steel HASNT melted, the corrogated iron has!

Then again, is this just another example of how evil the NWO is? :D

Mailman
Click to expand...


This being in NZ, I blame the ewes.
A ewish conspiracy?
 
Let me get this straight. Let me know if I missed anything.

A controlled demolition brought down the towers. Thermite is what was used
Thermite does not explode. Explosions were heard.
Molten metal was found in the wreckage. It was tested and found to be steel by whom?
Molten steel was picked up during the removal of the towers. How can someone pick up a liquid?
The wreckage burned for 99 days after the attacks. The fires were insulated in the wreckage.
Explosives were used to destroy the columns exactly where the planes hit. But explosions do not melt steel.


in a nutshell, an explosive that doesn't explode yet can melt steel was used in the towers exactly where the planes hit, resulting in a 100 day fire that was able to keep some metal that was supposed to be strong enough to withstand fire in a liquid form?

Did I get this right?
 
Unsecured Coins said:
Let me get this straight. Let me know if I missed anything.

A controlled demolition brought down the towers. Thermite is what was used
Thermite does not explode. Explosions were heard.
Molten metal was found in the wreckage. It was tested and found to be steel by whom?
Molten steel was picked up during the removal of the towers. How can someone pick up a liquid?
The wreckage burned for 99 days after the attacks. The fires were insulated in the wreckage.
Explosives were used to destroy the columns exactly where the planes hit. But explosions do not melt steel.


in a nutshell, an explosive that doesn't explode yet can melt steel was used in the towers exactly where the planes hit, resulting in a 100 day fire that was able to keep some metal that was supposed to be strong enough to withstand fire in a liquid form?

Did I get this right?
Click to expand...

Pretty much.
It takes a special kind of head to take these claims seriously.
 
Steel-melting hay, huh? Interesting.... I have a theory.

Cow eats hay. Cow gets full. Cow poops out hay.

Evil NWO shill collects poop and puts it in brown paper bag.

This process repeats 4,363,907 times.

Marvin Bush tapes 4,363,903 poop-laden paper bags in the towers. Tapes remaining 4 in WTC7.

Viola!!
 
realitybites said:
Steel-melting hay, huh? Interesting.... I have a theory.

Cow eats hay. Cow gets full. Cow poops out hay.

Evil NWO shill collects poop and puts it in brown paper bag.

This process repeats 4,363,907 times.

Marvin Bush tapes 4,363,903 poop-laden paper bags in the towers. Tapes remaining 4 in WTC7.

Viola!!
Click to expand...

This is an interesting theory... And the fact that there is absolutely no evidence for it- and quite a bit of evidence to the contrary- indicates that the conspiracy goes all the way to the farmers.

Sulfur found on the beams would indicate that what you're saying about the poopy bags is true. I wonder if we could find some politically motivated, outdated, and wacky professors of philosophy to back up your claims.

Anybody know of any?
 
Huh. I know where this happened. I've driven past it a few times, I think.

Also:

He says because of the fire's sheer size and intensity, firefighters will have to leave it to burn itself out over a couple of weeks because there is nothing more that they can do.
Click to expand...

Thermite is the only explanation for this steel being molten for weeks! :eek:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom