Fire and Steel

[rwguinn]

Sometimes, after complaining about how an architect is making my design task so difficult, I remember that there is a reason why they were hired in the first place. If engineers designed buildings they'd all be square with mono-sloping roofs, no windows and only one door.

You say that like it is a bad thing...

 

[BenBurch]

Sometimes, after complaining about how an architect is making my design task so difficult, I remember that there is a reason why they were hired in the first place. If engineers designed buildings they'd all be square with mono-sloping roofs, no windows and only one door.

 

[Bell]

Sometimes, after complaining about how an architect is making my design task so difficult, I remember that there is a reason why they were hired in the first place. If engineers designed buildings they'd all be square with mono-sloping roofs, no windows and only one door.

Those kind of buildings worked well in the former communist countries!

 

[Gravy]

4th April 2005 Geest pasta factory at Barton on Humber catches fire, most of the factory collapses.

...And the conspiracists miss another obvious conspiracy:

One food industry executive, who touched wood as he spoke, said: "There are two types of food company: those that have had a fire and those that are going to have a fire."

More conspiracy:

Last October a fire at Premier Foods' factory in Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, caused a temporary shortage of Branston pickle.

...While sales of Piccalilli Relish soared. Qui bono, indeed!

A week later Direct Table Foods' bacon factory, a few hundred yards from Premier's, was destroyed by fire.

...Resulting in the deaths of two downwind Bury St. Edmunds residents, who were unable to outrun the tsunami of drool that destroyed much of Risbygate Street.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/6261fa22-bb74-11d9-911a-00000e2511c8.html?nclick_check=1

 

[peteweaver]

Another food industry fire occurred last month:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/coventry_warwickshire/7076175.stm

Four firefighters were killed when part of a roof collapsed onto them

The worst firefighting disaster in the UK since the 1970's.

 

[FactCheck]

Did anyone else notice Bofors never answered the slightest of technical questions? His answers were (And I paraphrase) "Of course I understand! See, I graduated college for this stuff!". It has become clear to me this guy is not who he says he is. Anyone can scan someone else's credentials and say its theirs. Yet another conspiracy con man exposed.

I find it an insult to my intelligence when someone says "Unfortunately, you continue to mislead others to the wrong conclusion in this very serious matter." then says "Arguing that no "fire-proofed" steel-frame structure has globally collapsed prior 9/11 due to fire, gives good reason to question that it happened on 9/11."

Misleading (Lie) 1) He suggest the impact levels of the WTC had fireproofing. Something which would be impossible given the fireproofing of the lower floors came off just in the collapse. Lets play "Where's the fire proofing on GZ" (http://www.debunking911.com/gz.htm)

Misleading (Lie) 2) He either suggest there was other "tube in a tube" designed buildings which had airliners rammed into them at 500 MPH and didn't collapse or he left that nugget of information out on purpose to mislead people into thinking the WTC damage was just like any other building on fire. For WTC 7 he must be suggesting there are other buildings which were 47 stories tall and hit by another building. He also suggests these buildings all had a cantilever core over an electrical substation.

http://www.debunking911.com/firsttime.htm

The loose change forum is filled with gullible people. I believe that's where you'd rather spend your time.

He also keeps saying the buildings fell straight down. THEY DID NOT! They fell apart and here is unquestionable PROOF.

http://www.debunking911.com/collapse.htm

He either thinks we are that stupid or he is that smart.