• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Final Cut announcement?

CptColumbo said:
Of course, UK Dave is assuming that it will have a worldwide release.
Click to expand...

Assume nothing, for all you do then is make an ASS out of U and ME both :D

In fact I seriously doubt that LC:FC will see anything like a global release. Some countries have much stricter libel laws than the US
 
Oliver said:
The final cut will be available on November, 11:

Official Site:
Click to expand...

I found it interesting that the trailer for the final cut has a brief clip of the South side of WTC 7 smoking profusely.
 
Last edited:
Back in the beginning of September I emailed Mr. Avery to see if he could answer some questions for me. First I asked him how he explains the photographs of airplane parts at the Pentagon if a plane never hit it. He told me to "check out the Final Cut". So we can possibly look forward to an "explanation" of that in this edition. Then we went back and forth on the subject of controlled demolition of WTC 1 and 2. Finally I asked him if he knew what is done to prepare a building for demolition. Silly me, I thought it was a reasonable enough question for a man who has worked on a documentary which contends, among other things, that WTC 1 and 2 were brought down in a controlled demolition. His exact response was "No, I do not, I'm not a demolition expert." My exact response to him was "You don't have to be a demolition expert to find out what is done to prep a building for demolition. I'm not an expert at all either but I found out. All it takes is a bit of elementary research." His response to that was "Aren't we getting into semantics here?"
 
cozmo236 said:
Back in the beginning of September I emailed Mr. Avery to see if he could answer some questions for me. First I asked him how he explains the photographs of airplane parts at the Pentagon if a plane never hit it. He told me to "check out the Final Cut". So we can possibly look forward to an "explanation" of that in this edition. Then we went back and forth on the subject of controlled demolition of WTC 1 and 2. Finally I asked him if he knew what is done to prepare a building for demolition. Silly me, I thought it was a reasonable enough question for a man who has worked on a documentary which contends, among other things, that WTC 1 and 2 were brought down in a controlled demolition. His exact response was "No, I do not, I'm not a demolition expert." My exact response to him was "You don't have to be a demolition expert to find out what is done to prep a building for demolition. I'm not an expert at all either but I found out. All it takes is a bit of elementary research." His response to that was "Aren't we getting into semantics here?"
Click to expand...


You're a lucky guy - I never got any reply to my emails to Dylan
or Gravy (Mark Roberts)...

But since Dylan stated that the final Cut will "hold all water", I
eager to see the final cut - as much as the Debunkers do, I guess. :)
 
..."In order to access the normal "big movie" distribution channels, we would have to relinquish editorial control of the film. This just wasn't an option for us, as the integrity of our message is ultimately all that we have, and we feared that "the machine" would corrupt or squash our film and its movement."
Click to expand...

Integrity? Surely, you jest... you're just afraid to admit that once real film people get ahold of your project and take out all the falsivities (I dun maded up a new word, y'all) you'd have a 62 second film that starts out with credits, shows planes hit the towers, roll the end credits, thank you for coming.
 
cozmo236 said:
First I asked him how he explains the photographs of airplane parts at the Pentagon if a plane never hit it. He told me to "check out the Final Cut". So we can possibly look forward to an "explanation" of that in this edition.
Click to expand...
Man you're quite the optimist. ;)
 
The lc crowd was complaining that they were getting killed on "digg" so I went over and checked it out. I found this quote by someone connected with lcfc and the comment after it pretty accurate.

FTA: "In order to access the normal "big movie" distribution channels, we would have to relinquish editorial control of the film. This just wasn't an option for us, as the integrity of our message is ultimately all that we have, and we feared that "the machine" would corrupt or squash our film and its movement."

Comment:

"In other words, no studio would touch this unless Avery and company allowed the film distributors legal staff to fact check the film and remove material that was incorrect or that blamed individuals of criminal wrong-doing without the evidence to back up the charge. Looks like the Loose Change boys will still be able to milk this tragedy for a few more bucks but nowhere near the amount that they were hoping for. Good!"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom