• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Final Cut announcement?

jsfisher said:
Wouldn't he more likely just go to the pre-announcement of the announcement announcing the announcement and just forgo the whole non-announcement announcement all together?

Maybe he will announce his intentions in this regard.
Click to expand...
"there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns -- the ones we don't know we don't know." - Donald Rumsfeld.

:D
 
The Silver Shadow said:
"there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns -- the ones we don't know we don't know." - Donald Rumsfeld.

:D
Click to expand...

I love that quote.

It makes sense to me...am I the only one? :confused:
 
Calcas said:
I love that quote.

It makes sense to me...am I the only one? :confused:
Click to expand...
I think you'll love this one then by our former (un)esteemed Prime Minister.

Get Ready...

A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven.
Jean Chretien
 
Well it's been 4 days now - what is Dylan's definition of "a few"?
Oh wait here's a Twoofer dictionary: "A Few: One hundred and eleven raised by ten to the eleventh power"
 
gmanontario said:
I think you'll love this one then by our former (un)esteemed Prime Minister.

Get Ready...

A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven.
Jean Chretien
Click to expand...

Have you proven that statement? In short, do you have proof that proof is proof? Enquiring minds want to know.
 
Comsat Angel said:
Well it's been 4 days now - what is Dylan's definition of "a few"?
Oh wait here's a Twoofer dictionary: "A Few: One hundred and eleven raised by ten to the eleventh power"
Click to expand...
Multiple hundreds? Reference: Their numerous statements about how many people need to be involved in the 9/11 conspiracy.
 
LashL said:
Oops, it looks like "TraitorBasher, previously known as, um, whatever he was previously known as (i.e. whatever fake persona he was using most recently) won't be answering posts in this thread of his any time soon.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=80073

Sockpuppet of tonicblue et al. No surprise.
Click to expand...

He is already over there, wailing and knashing his nails http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=7873

what is JREF?


A big group of crack smoking, Bush-humping, Cheney back-licking, NeoCon-Loving, fudge-packing douchbags. Oh yeah, and if you have kids, watch out...I heard they like to call the cops on truthers. Never underestimate the power of 'tards with no life.

Mike
Click to expand...

That's funny, as I do not ever remember performing homosexual intercourse with President George Bush, nor even liking the man very much, or any of his policies, at all. Ditto Cheney and his back.

*Shouts to those lurking*
Hey Truthers, when someone disagree's with you, they aren't immediatly a "neo-con". I think it is telling about the age of your little minds!
 
Undesired Walrus said:
That's funny, as I do not ever remember performing homosexual intercourse with President George Bush, nor even liking the man very much, or any of his policies, at all. Ditto Cheney and his back.
Click to expand...

Of course you don't remember -- you were smoking crack that day.

Duh.
 
Undesired Walrus said:
He is already over there, wailing and knashing his nails http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=7873



That's funny, as I do not ever remember performing homosexual intercourse with President George Bush, nor even liking the man very much, or any of his policies, at all. Ditto Cheney and his back.

*Shouts to those lurking*
Hey Truthers, when someone disagree's with you, they aren't immediatly a "neo-con". I think it is telling about the age of your little minds!
Click to expand...

Too funny!

Let's see. I've never smoked crack, never had sex with George Bush, never licked Cheney's back (and can't even begin to fathom how "TraitorBasher" - previously known as "ERichardson," and previous to that having at least a couple of other identities including "Jaguar" and "tonicblue" - imagines that "back licking" is a bad thing); I've never been a neo-con; and Ed only knows what TB/ER/J/tb means by "fudge packing douchbags." In regard to the latter, I can only guess that this is a combination of TB/ER/J/tb's homophobia and poor spelling skills.

And to round out my response to this guy's post at the Loose Change Forum to which you linked, I should add that I've never been a "'tard" (it appears that TraitorBasher/ERichardson/Jaguar/tonicblue has issues with people with disabilities just as he has issues with homosexuality) and I should also add that, unlike many/most troofers, I have a real life (again, something that TraitorBasher/ERichardson/Jaguar/tonicblue appears not to have, given his propensity for posting absolute drivel on multiple forums under multiple personas).

Additionally, this is rather humorous, too: someone on the Loose Change forum suggests that TB/ER/J/tb was banned because of his user name:

waterbender at LC said:
only a guess but maybe the name you chose had somethig to do with the problem
Click to expand...

I wonder how long it will take before TB/ER/J/tb explains that his user name had nothing to do with it and that he had previously specifically asked to have his ERichardson name changed to TraitorBasher (in a failed effort to try to make an unfounded and ridiculous point, which was - not surprisingly - never made), and that the moderators accommodated his request.
 
Last edited:
gmanontario said:
I think you'll love this one then by our former (un)esteemed Prime Minister.

Get Ready...

A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven.
Jean Chretien
Click to expand...
In its tortured way, this is the best choice M. Chretien ever made in his Prime Ministership, a choice to stay out of Iraq without proof of WMD.
 
Last edited:
I'm guessing that he:

1. Doesn't have a girlfriend. This explains his fascination with homosexuality.

2. Isn't all that bright. This would explain his disdain for retarded folk.

3. Has a dull life and hates the stereotype of Jewish success.

Give this man a radio show!
 
Personally I would go the one step further and say TB/ER/TonicBlue/Jaguar/Aphelion/Wizard/Docker/Maize/pdohrety76 :p

I sent a PM to the mods highlighting several similarities between those listed above. I wonder if that had anything to do with it...
 
The Doc said:
Personally I would go the one step further and say TB/ER/TonicBlue/Jaguar/Aphelion/Wizard/Docker/Maize/pdohrety76 :p

I sent a PM to the mods highlighting several similarities between those listed above. I wonder if that had anything to do with it...
Click to expand...

I thought Tonicblue/Jaguar/ERichardson/TraitorBasher were seperate from Pdohrety76/et al.

ETA or are you suspecting they are?
 
Last edited:
The Doc said:
Personally I would go the one step further and say TB/ER/TonicBlue/Jaguar/Aphelion/Wizard/Docker/Maize/pdohrety76 :p

I sent a PM to the mods highlighting several similarities between those listed above. I wonder if that had anything to do with it...
Click to expand...
Also this thread and his "mod bashing" apparently had a lot to do with his late banning. As well as his admitted reporting post abuses and his apparent immaturity which he exhibited by announcing that he was putting many posters on ignore. And he screams about censorship...as Killtown was so fond of saying...pot meet kettle :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom