• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Female Engineers

SRW

Master Poster
Joined
Jul 25, 2001
Messages
2,903
I worked in the electronics industry for over 22 years and noticed that there were not many female engineers. In all that time I think we only hired 5 or 6, and none stayed very long. Ether they would move on to another company or into marketing.

I know that loosing them to marketing really upset their managers, because he would always have to re-distribute the work they were doing. In all that time no male engineers left for marketing, although many left for other companies. By the way engineers usually dislike marketing because the make up stuff and blame the engineers for not making it work. Any one else have experience with female engineers?
 
I know several. My sister took some years off to have a few kids, but is back working as an engineer. Some of the others I haven't seen for a while, so don't know if they are still in the field or not.
 
Never seen any female engineers in all the train rides I've taken.
 
The number of female engineers is increasing, but women are still far from parity with men. Whenever I can, I encourage women who have an aptitude for mathematics to become engineers.

When I went to kindergarten, about half the class was girls and half was boys. This ratio stayed true in grade school and all the way through high school. Aside from sex-separated classes such as gym and shop, the half-girls, half-boys ratio held true in all my classes.

When I got my first college degree, about half the people in all my classes were women and about half were men. This was true even of math and science classes. The only classes that were all men were physical education classes. Then in law school, about half the people in all my classes were women and about half were men. (Just a few years earlier, law students were overwhelmingly male.)

So I went all through school, got two college degrees, and had roughly equal representation of the sexes all through school, except for classes that were intentionally single-sex.

And then I went to Engineering school. At first, most of the classes had about half women and about half men. When I focused on Electrical Engineering, however, that changed. Several of my classes were all male. Advanced electronics, all male. Advanced analog circuits, all male. Various control systems, all male. Every other class, overwhelmingly male.

The "stag" nature of the classes was not by requirement, but by choice. Few women wanted to be electrical engineers. They seemed to prefer mechanical and biomedical engineering. I asked several of my female friends why this was so, and the answer was that they simply prefer mechanical and biomedical engineering to electrical engineering.
 
Brown said:
The "stag" nature of the classes was not by requirement, but by choice. Few women wanted to be electrical engineers. They seemed to prefer mechanical and biomedical engineering. I asked several of my female friends why this was so, and the answer was that they simply prefer mechanical and biomedical engineering to electrical engineering.

Well that would explain it our engineers were EE's or IE's (industrial engineers).
 
Up until a year and a half ago, I worked for a company that manufactured parts for airplanes. We had more female engineers than male (3 female, 2 male). Whether that was chance or if the company made a special effort to hire women, I couldn't say.
 
Phil said:
Never seen any female engineers in all the train rides I've taken.

They are the ones with the good looking cabooses
 
I had the same experience in college - in computer science classes there might be one or two females in a class of 25. I had a friend from high school who was one of the (relative) few in the school and she was a very pretty girl. She was absolutely inundated with date requests from the other students since she was not only attractive, but one of few available. I felt sorry for her - we would sit in a computer lab doing work and she would get constant attention from the pasty-white boy engineering students. (she did end up marrying one of them though, so I guess all is well that ends well.)

So ladies, if you're looking for an academic path to meeting lots of boys, come on down to the computer science department. They're waiting for you!

The interesting thing about this is that now that I'm in the workforce, the male/female split is much smaller. 2 of 5 technical people on my team are female. At my last job, 1 of 4 was. That's a tremendous increase in percentage from college where it was more like 10 to 1.

Frink
 
In our company ~ 75% of the Chem Engineers are women.
 
There have always been more men in my technical education and work.

However, I worked for a while in the telephony area (telephone switches, call routing, computer control of telephone functions). I looked up one day in a meeting of around a dozen people and realized I was the only man. I don't know why, but there seem to be a lot of women in this field. It's technical, but not exactly computer work.

I have a theory on this that may be a crock, but it's what I've seen. People's personalities tend match their work. People who do database work tend to be concerned about keeping control over what they have. They have the data, and they control access to it. People who work in telephony or telecommunications tend to be concerned most about interactions among things. They are happier to communicate with other people to get things done.

I think women might be more drawn to this type of work because it's very communication oriented.
 
The average female is in the 16th % of the male distribution for math and spatial skills.

Perhaps this explains it???
 
bpesta22 said:
The average female is in the 16th % of the male distribution for math and spatial skills.

Perhaps this explains it???

Exactly where did you get this little bit of statisical trivia? :confused:
 
belinda said:


Exactly where did you get this little bit of statisical trivia? :confused:

Actually, it's scientific fact-- one of the most replicated effects in psychology.

See:

Halpern, D. (1997). Sex differences in intelligence: Implications for education. American Psychologist, 52, 1091-1102.




It's testosterone versus estrogen, btw
 
Errm...I don't know what research you have done into it...but whilst on some IQ tests males may outperform females in spatial and mathematical reasoning, (and v/versa for language) ( and not forgetting the HUGE range of individual differences) a lot of studies show that the REASON this happens is due to the gender sterotype and to academic expectation ( on behalf of both the student and the teacher). Eg Academic Self-Concept
 
Also - I don't think you mean the 16th percentile - that would mean that on average females score as well as the bottom 16% of males.
 
belinda said:
Errm...I don't know what research you have done into it...but whilst on some IQ tests males may outperform females in spatial and mathematical reasoning, (and v/versa for language) ( and not forgetting the HUGE range of individual differences) a lot of studies show that the REASON this happens is due to the gender sterotype and to academic expectation ( on behalf of both the student and the teacher). Eg Academic Self-Concept

There's also volumes of research on stereotype threat. A google search ought to get the basics of that interesting phenomena. Look for Claude Steele or Steven Spencer as authors in particular.
 
belinda said:
Also - I don't think you mean the 16th percentile - that would mean that on average females score as well as the bottom 16% of males.

Yes, that's exactly what I mean-- look at the article I cited, by the premier researcher in the field (who happens to be female).

The male / female difference on math and spatial tasks is 1 standard deviation, putting the average female at just the 16th% of males.

There are verbal tasks where the difference is as big, but in the other direction-- favoring females.

You really should check out the article-- the differences have little to do with socialization, or "academic self concept" (blech! what journal is that crap published in?) but testosterone versus estrogen, and sex differences in brain anatomy.

Just some interesting examples:

1) The size of the math difference is biggest when the female is on her period-- where estrogen levels are highest.

2) Older males given testosterone also show a boost in math / spatial skill.

3) Females exposed to too much androgen while developing in the womb (i.e., CAH females):

a) score higher than normal females on math and spatial tasks,

b) prefer male toys (i.e., gi joe) over female toys (i.e. dolls)

and,

c) are more likely to be lesbian.

4) as kids, females originally do better in math. Once puberty kicks in (i.e. male increase in testosterone levels) males do better by a lot, and the difference remains throughout the lifespan.

5) Perfect scores on the SAT math section are 100 to 1 by males (iirc).

Verbal Stuff:

Although the male brain on average is bigger, the female corpus collosum (the bundle of fibers on the top / center of the brain that let the two hemispheres communicate) is bigger on average in females.

Further, females-- with high probability-- process language in both hemispheres; whereas right handed males use the left hemisphere just about exclusively.

6) Females do much better in reading comprehension, verbal fluency and synonym generation measures

7) 3 x 5 times as many males stutter, or get dyslexia.

I can go on, but the evidence that the difference is biologically based is outstanding.

Further, it even explains why men on average make more money than women on average.

When controlling for occupation type, the earnings gap disappears for women in their 20's and 30's, and shrinks to only 4% for older females.

B
 
:mad: Calm...Breath deep...Ok now I can type... if you want me to read the paper, give me the link. I don't have quick and easy access to that particular journal. Otherwise I can not comment on the paper.

It is not as clear cut and dried as you make out.... I admit I did my degree in psych a few years ago, but there are still contradictory papers to what you are suggesting. Don't forget, a few decades ago the published work was proving the black's were intellectually inferior to whites and that this was biologically based as well. (NOTE to mod - I DON'T support this view).
 
belinda said:
:mad: Calm...Breath deep...Ok now I can type... if you want me to read the paper, give me the link. I don't have quick and easy access to that particular journal. Otherwise I can not comment on the paper.

It is not as clear cut and dried as you make out.... I admit I did my degree in psych a few years ago, but there are still contradictory papers to what you are suggesting. Don't forget, a few decades ago the published work was proving the black's were intellectually inferior to whites and that this was biologically based as well. (NOTE to mod - I DON'T support this view).


Well, it's real science published in an A journal, so I'm not sure I can find a link to it on the net. I will check though.

I have a Ph.D. in cognitive psych, for what it's worth, and it is that cut and dried.

You could change my mind simply by showing me the data, but good luck in that regard. I think the only more replicated effects in all of psychology is either cognitive slowing with age or the fact that males are more aggressive than females (uhm, guess what causes this one too :)

Don't get me started on the black white thingy either ;)
 
We could go forever one-upping each other (my study is better than your study)etc. Eg. This quote is out of a report I found just by googling for gender differences and maths. The studies referred to have been published in reputable, peer reviewed journals.

"A study (Hamilton and Snow) of tests in biology and astronomy taken by 1100 17 year olds showed no format effect when comparing constructed format and MCQs, but males scored better on questions involving spatial or visual content. Interestingly, a short lesson on spatial-mechanical reasoning eliminated the effect. This could indicate a difference related to experience rather than an inherent gender traits. This is also suggested by a study by Byrnes et al. (1997) in which maths items that showed a large gender difference in American students showed no such difference in Chinese students. "

Please don't tell me that American male students somehow have more testosterone than Chinese male students when compared to their female counterparts.

I admit there have been gender differences found in testing math and spatial skills, what I disagree with is the biological basis of such a huge difference (1SD according to your study). Old nature vs. nurture debate. (plus of course biases in the testing used
;) )
 

Back
Top Bottom