I'm wondering about this. What is it that makes the Federal Reserve system a popular target for conspiracy theories?
I'm wondering about this. What is it that makes the Federal Reserve system a popular target for conspiracy theories?
I'm wondering about this. What is it that makes the Federal Reserve system a popular target for conspiracy theories?
What is it that makes the Federal Reserve system a popular target for conspiracy theories?
I think the chief complaint about the Fed and other central banks is not that its some sinister conspiracy, but that its not run in the interests of most ordinary people.
That some bankers are greedy and reckless is hardly a contesious statement in light of the terrible damage they have wreaked around the world in the last 3 years. But it's really the whole system represented by the fed, the Bank of England etc, the politicians, the rating agencies and the regulators that has not been run in the interests of ordinary people. The evidence for that is all around you, in mangled public finances, unemployment, tax rises and savage government spending cuts. All things that affect ordinary people far more than they do the bankers and the oligarchs themselves.If thats true, its a pathetically weak argument. They could say the same thing about any economic or political institution (and would have just as little evidence for it too).
I think the chief complaint about the Fed and other central banks is not that its some sinister conspiracy, but that its not run in the interests of most ordinary people.
Decisions that the Fed makes and actions that they take have a very big impact on the overall economy, which in turn effect everybody in the country. How could it not be a ripe target for conspiracy theories.
It's like the NIST of the financial world: a large entity with an obscure mandate, which does things that most Joe Blow CT types don't understand. Add in the distrust of "banksters" that's endemic to the CT mindset, and you're there.
That some bankers are greedy and reckless is hardly a contesious statement in light of the terrible damage they have wreaked around the world in the last 3 years. But it's really the whole system represented by the fed, the Bank of England etc, the politicians, the rating agencies and the regulators that has not been run in the interests of ordinary people. The evidence for that is all around you, in mangled public finances, unemployment, tax rises and savage government spending cuts. All things that affect ordinary people far more than they do the bankers and the oligarchs themselves.
That's the same excuse they use against the government in general. Most of that is based on some bizarre belief that, "if nothing they do has a direct benefit to me, they don't work 'for the people'."
I shudder to think how screwed up things might become if the FED did operate to benefit people directly. What makes the FED a necessary institution is that it often does things that are very unpopular and not directly beneficial to the masses because things need to be stabilized for the future. Controlling inflation, for example, is always unpopular in the immediate sense but think of how bad things would be if no one ever did it.
That some bankers are greedy and reckless is hardly a contesious statement in light of the terrible damage they have wreaked around the world in the last 3 years. But it's really the whole system represented by the fed, the Bank of England etc, the politicians, the rating agencies and the regulators that has not been run in the interests of ordinary people. The evidence for that is all around you, in mangled public finances, unemployment, tax rises and savage government spending cuts. All things that affect ordinary people far more than they do the bankers and the oligarchs themselves.
Yes because most people, during an era of vast money supply expansion, have experienced nothing but falling or static prices and increasing wages. And yes, that was sarcasm.