February Stundie nominations

Moon madness part 2 making the one above look positively sane:

davidicke com/forum/showpost.php?p=1059686795&postcount=298


"The REAL reason that we only see one side of the moon is that 12,000 years ago, the Reptilioid Illuminae, shortly after arriving (crash-landing) at Earth in their crippled/damaged interstellar craft needed to fabricate a new spaceship to enable them to visit and rape a new planet, once they had finished with the stealing the Earth's resources and enslaving it's unfortunate inhabitants.

The Illuminae were delighted to find the moon was of approximately the right size and mass x2. Using their advanced weaponry they actually cut the moon in half and changed it's orbit so that we now see the half moon as it is and never the rest of the surface- this is because the remainder of the Moon was positioned in an orbit directly in opposition to the Moon that we see.

That also explains why those who live in in coastal regions, experience TWO Oceanic tides a day and not ONE, as might be expected from a singular Moon. This is due to the tidal action of TWO moons, not ONE.

The massive gravitational upheavals experienced on Earth due to the moving of the stolen half Moon to it's current position caused the end of the last ice-age and precipitated all the mythological calamities found in pan-human racial memory and pseudo-historical religious manuals such as the "Bible". The flood of Noah was caused by tidal activity due to the moving of the severed half- moon.

The Illuminae are currently fitting out the other half- Moon as a fully functional "Death- Star" type planetary inter-stellar space-craft. It is nearing completion."




Is it me or is that just a touch beyond conspiracy theory and closer to loony bin theory:eye-poppi

Has this guy never researched tides? Twice now he's used the existence of two high tides as evidence for two moons.

That's not a third p*nis - its a second head.

Oh. ;)
 
I'm delurking because of the sheer Stundie quality of this entire site. Best is the author's concluding thought on the validity of geocentrism:

By 1851, despite Copernicus, Galileo and Kepler no proof existed of the rotation of the earth.

The Jesuits were getting DESPERATE because without a rotating earth the theory of evolution falls flat on its face.

At that time a Jesuit named Leon Foucault "invented" a contrivance that supposedly PROVED the rotation of the earth.

The Foucault pendulum was just another Jesuit hoax like the Piltdown man. ssss
 
no, I am nominating posts that I really do feel deserve an award for their ridiculous language.

So what's wrong with

'a belief doesn't actually require evidence, if you could prove an existence of God, it wouldn't be called a belief.'
 
The Foucault pendulum was just another Jesuit hoax like the Piltdown man.

I'd love to hear how they are faking these pendulums all over the world. I've seen two myself.
 
I'm delurking because of the sheer Stundie quality of this entire site. Best is the author's concluding thought on the validity of geocentrism:

By 1851, despite Copernicus, Galileo and Kepler no proof existed of the rotation of the earth.

The Jesuits were getting DESPERATE because without a rotating earth the theory of evolution falls flat on its face.

At that time a Jesuit named Leon Foucault "invented" a contrivance that supposedly PROVED the rotation of the earth.

The Foucault pendulum was just another Jesuit hoax like the Piltdown man. ssss


Lol... What...?
 
By 1851, despite Copernicus, Galileo and Kepler no proof existed of the rotation of the earth.

The Jesuits were getting DESPERATE because without a rotating earth the theory of evolution falls flat on its face.

History fail.

Norm
 
Did anyone understand his theory of eclipses of the moon given that he believes the moon shines with it's own radiance? I read that section twice but had to quit while I still had enough clarity to find the 'back' button.
 
No, I'm a believer now that I've read that site. In fact, I'm just starting to get my head around the fact that Hades is real, and it is located at the center of the earth!

Holy crap!!!

Did anyone understand his theory of eclipses of the moon given that he believes the moon shines with it's own radiance? I read that section twice but had to quit while I still had enough clarity to find the 'back' button.

No, but I didn't understand a lot of his other gibberish, either.
 
Did anyone understand his theory of eclipses of the moon given that he believes the moon shines with it's own radiance? I read that section twice but had to quit while I still had enough clarity to find the 'back' button.

I hate beer being forced through my nose!
But I'm still laughing...
 
I'm delurking because of the sheer Stundie quality of this entire site. Best is the author's concluding thought on the validity of geocentrism:

I particularly like that he believes that christmas is on 25th June in the southern hemisphere!

Edit - Although this

"The earth is NOT TILTED 23.45°degrees....It is UPRIGHT as God created man to walk UPRIGHT"

is good as well.
 
Last edited:
I particularly like that he believes that christmas is on 25th June in the southern hemisphere!

Actually he is almost correct about this, but not for the reason he thinks.

Australians too love a traditional Christmas dinner, however the typical midsummer heat here on Christmas Day, means that many families are forced to focus on salads, because it is just too hot to get enthusiastic about a traditional big roast with pudding etc.

So over the years many Australian families and organisations have opted to have an addition Christmas dinner in July celebration, in the middle of winter when it's nice and cool and great for tucking in to a sumptuous big feast. A Christmas in July dinner usually includes Christmas Decorations Christmas Candles, colourful streamers, bonbons, Christmas hats and whistles.

http://www.santaswarehouse.com.au/history_of_christmas/christmas_in_july.shtml


Norm
 

Back
Top Bottom