February Stundie Nominations

[Dave Rogers]

Tony Szamboti sneaks into the February contest at the last minute with a late run. Apparently the collapse of the Twin Towers was a static event.

It was not a dynamic event as there was no deceleration. Please explain why you continue to think it was a dynamic event.

That's right, folks; the collapse of a quarter of a million tons of skyscraper, from heights over a thousand feet down to ground level, didn't involve anything moving.

Dave

 

[dafydd]

Tony Szamboti sneaks into the February contest at the last minute with a late run. Apparently the collapse of the Twin Towers was a static event.



That's right, folks; the collapse of a quarter of a million tons of skyscraper, from heights over a thousand feet down to ground level, didn't involve anything moving.

Dave

So it was a Zeno's paradox collapse?

 

[jaydeehess]

So it was a Zeno's paradox collapse?

OMG its still collapsing? So much for 'near free fall"!

 

[jaydeehess]

Tony Szamboti sneaks into the February contest at the last minute with a late run. Apparently the collapse of the Twin Towers was a static event.



That's right, folks; the collapse of a quarter of a million tons of skyscraper, from heights over a thousand feet down to ground level, didn't involve anything moving.

Dave

Correct me if I am wrong but he is supposed to be an engineer, right?

Unless it collapsed AT free fall acelleration then there were dynamic impacts all the way down. If its average acelleration is less than g there were impacts.

Now since the only way for there to be no dynamic impacts, each and every floor would have to have its columns blown out at the exact same moment, and since that is obviously not in evidence, this was in fact a dynamic event. The arguement can be on the details of the events but not on whether or not it was dynamic.

 

[jaydeehess]

IIRC, there is a scene where the little boy is playing on the floor and he senses something and he stands up. On his shirt it a rocket and the words "Apollo 11". The boy then walks to room 237. the distance from the Earth to the moon is 237,000 miles. In this room people hallucinate so nothing there is "real".

There may be more but it's been a long time since I've seen the movie and heard that CT.

Iwish I still had my copy of the book. I bought it several years before the movie came out. If the room number was changed for the movie then the nutbars have a case -sort of, its still insane- , however if the room number was the original one that King used then it would seem they have a conundrum. Do they now include Stephen King as being in-on-it? How does that make Kubrick a whistle blower if the room number was not his idea, or did Stephen King fake the Apollo videos for NASA when he was 22 years old and still a university student?

 

[Dave Rogers]

Correct me if I am wrong but he is supposed to be an engineer, right?

Unless it collapsed AT free fall acelleration then there were dynamic impacts all the way down. If its average acelleration is less than g there were impacts.

Now since the only way for there to be no dynamic impacts, each and every floor would have to have its columns blown out at the exact same moment, and since that is obviously not in evidence, this was in fact a dynamic event. The arguement can be on the details of the events but not on whether or not it was dynamic.

It's far, far worse than that. Dynamics is the study of objects in motion. If the collapse of the towers was not a dynamic event, then they can't have collapsed, because by definition there is no motion in an event that is not dynamic. There's nothing subtle about how stupid a statement it is.

Dave

 

[NWO Sentryman]

something at the 11th hour

Tesla was a genius who was far ahead of his time, and is responsible for pioneering our electrical power grid. If Edison's idiotic ideas were implemented, there would be a huge power plant on every corner. If Tesla were allowed to continue his research unharrased we would have no ugly power lines and energy would have been clean and cheap a long time ago. What Berdon was talking about has nothing to do with "perputual motion machines", he is not a crank by any means. Reich was a genius on many levels, far surpassing both Freud and Einstein in their respective fields. He was systematically destroyed by the FDA and US courts and his books and laboratory works were confiscated and actually BURNED in the USA. What was done to Reich is one of the most despicable chapters in US history. Surpression of energy technology is a well documented FACT.

The good news is that soon all three of these men will be proven to be right and the existing laws of conservation of energy and thermodynamics will be exposed for the flat earth hoaxes that they are..

So that means we'll never die?

 

[Horatius]

something at the 11th hour



So that means we'll never die?

Psst!