• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

FBI documents contradict 9/11 Commission report

HereticHulk

Muse
HereticHulk
Joined
Jul 18, 2007
Messages
714
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/FBI_documents_contradict_Sept._11_Commission_0228.html

Newly-released records obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request contradict the 9/11 Commission’s report on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks and raise fresh questions about the role of Saudi government officials in connection to the hijackers......
Click to expand...

Robert Baer, a former CIA case officer:
“There are enough discrepancies and unanswered questions in the 9/11 Commission report that under a friendly administration, the 9/11 investigation should be re-opened,” Baer wrote in an email message Tuesday night.
Click to expand...

Bob Kerrey:
“Congress should demand direct access to those who organized the attacks; our indirect interviews were at best inadequate,” Kerrey wrote. “And Congress should pursue [the] question of whether the Saudi government aided the conspiracy.”
Click to expand...

Maybe a new administration will reopen the 9/11 investigation? No matter where you stand on 9/11, there are far too many unanswered questions for being the largest terrorist attack on US soil.
 
Last edited:
So the government of Saudi Arabia...the folks who sponsor radical Islamists around the world, where Wahabbism is the official state religion, the country from where 15 of 19 hijackers originated...you're telling me that the people in charge of this place might have had a role in aiding 9/11?

Sounds pretty plausible.

Too bad more twoofers don't focus on the real conspiracy of 9/11: the fact that America was basically attacked by an "allied" nation. Yet Bush wages war in Iraq....
 
CHF said:
Too bad more twoofers don't focus on the real conspiracy of 9/11: the fact that America was basically attacked by an "allied" nation. Yet Bush wages war in Iraq....
Click to expand...

I would heartily agree. THIS is the kind of 'conspiracy' that people should be talking about, not thermite, death rays, micro nukes, remote-controlled planes, holograms, etc...

Sadly, when Heretichulk starts a thread like this the inevitable result is some kind of claim that these calls for another investigation should concentrate on 911 being an inside job.
 
First claim is that the 911 commission report was faulty for not saying that one of the hijackers had flights booked for after the attacks?

Why did the commission report need to put this in? Irrelevant nonsense.
 
funk de fino said:
First claim is that the 911 commission report was faulty for not saying that one of the hijackers had flights booked for after the attacks?

Why did the commission report need to put this in? Irrelevant nonsense.
Click to expand...

there's lots of irrelevant nonsense there, but I still think the Saudi connection was candy coated in the report.
 
Bob Kerrey made the above comments after reading Shenons book, not the FBI documents.

raw source said:
Kerrey declined to comment for this article. Other Commission members did not respond to requests for comment.
Click to expand...
 
Baer thinks bayoumi should be investigated for possible assistance to two hijackers. He does not claim or back up any inside job nonsense on the US part.
 
funk de fino said:
Baer thinks bayoumi should be investigated for possible assistance to two hijackers. He does not claim or back up any inside job nonsense on the US part.
Click to expand...

The articles brought up by the OP are the equivalent of truthers on the science side of the issue bringing up, for example, Quintere and claiming his objections support an inside job.

It's smacks of desperation.
 
The Saudi connection raises another interesting question that never seems to occur to twoofers:

If 9/11 was an inside job, why didn't the US government blame it on Iraqi terrorists?

It certainly would have saved them a whole lot of trouble, such as having to sugercoat the fact that their allies attack them, or having to justify the Iraq invasion with WMDs that couldn't be found.
 
CHF said:
The Saudi connection raises another interesting question that never seems to occur to twoofers:

If 9/11 was an inside job, why didn't the US government blame it on Iraqi terrorists?

It certainly would have saved them a whole lot of trouble, such as having to sugercoat the fact that their allies attack them, or having to justify the Iraq invasion with WMDs that couldn't be found.
Click to expand...

Well, they more or less did. They tried desperately to tie Al-qaeda to Iraq. Iraq harbors (past tense) terrorists, remember?
 
Kerrey declined to comment for this article. Other Commission members did not respond to requests for comment.
Click to expand...
A site whose tagline is "alternative news" can't get quotes from people? What is the world coming to? :rolleyes:
 
twinstead said:
The articles brought up by the OP are the equivalent of truthers on the science side of the issue bringing up, for example, Quintere and claiming his objections support an inside job.

It's smacks of desperation.
Click to expand...

Whatever.

I think it points to a LIHOP scenario. Did you miss this part?:

“About two months after al-Bayoumi began aiding Alhazmi and Almihdhar, NEWSWEEK has learned, al-Bayoumi's wife began receiving regular stipends, often monthly and usually around $2,000, totaling tens of thousands of dollars. The money came in the form of cashier's checks, purchased from Washington's Riggs Bank by Princess Haifa bint Faisal, the daughter of the late King Faisal and wife of Prince Bandar, the Saudi envoy who is a prominent Washington figure and personal friend of the Bush family.
Click to expand...

I do agree that the whole CD speculation is nonsense.
 
(great source - the raw story- Larisa Alexandrovna - bet she loves bush)We should invade Saudi Arabia they would kill terrorist and we just have them sit around. We can not have country cut off the heads of terrorist it is so barbaric, we should invade them and bring them water-boarding and long term care in a tropical facility. Cutting off heads is not the thing to do to terrorist, no wonder they camped out with UBL in Afghanistan; they like water-boarding and a trip to Cuba!

What a crock of junk, the book is full of junk, and the bs stuff is just right for 9/11 truth to jump on if it did not require reading for understanding. They will only use the hearsay snippets of reinvestigate and other quote mining from people who can read and understand and distort. Without doing any work, 9/11 truth will do what they do best
87904670cd1dc0fcb.jpg


The OP is a repeat from somewhere else, if not here at JREF.
 
Last edited:
HereticHulk said:
Well, they more or less did. They tried desperately to tie Al-qaeda to Iraq. Iraq harbors (past tense) terrorists, remember?
Click to expand...

Yeah and it failed miserably, hense the WMD justification.

Now had the US staged 9/11 do you think they would have had to "more or less" try to "desperately tie Al-qaeda to Iraq?"

No - the connection would have been obvious and it would have been included in the plot. Instead the 9/11 conspiracy included no links to Iraq whatsoever.

Sometimes I think twoofers believe 9/11 was an inside job because it's exactly how they would have pulled off such a conspiracy if they'd been put in charge of it.

"No, we won't do a successful repeat of the 1993 attack...instead we'll use bombs, thermite, drones, faked passenger airphone calls, maybe laser beam or two.....and to top it all off we won't blame it on the people we want to attack! Instead we'll use a WMD justification and we won't even plant some WMD in the event that we don't find any.

This plan simply cannot fail...unless some single white males in their early 20s make a movie about it and post it on youtube."
:dl:
 
Last edited:
twinstead said:
I would heartily agree. THIS is the kind of 'conspiracy' that people should be talking about, not thermite, death rays, micro nukes, remote-controlled planes, holograms, etc...

Sadly, when Heretichulk starts a thread like this the inevitable result is some kind of claim that these calls for another investigation should concentrate on 911 being an inside job.
Click to expand...

So then wht do you spend so much time on all that other stuff?
 
HereticHulk said:
Whatever.

I think it points to a LIHOP scenario. Did you miss this part?:
“About two months after al-Bayoumi began aiding Alhazmi and Almihdhar, NEWSWEEK has learned, al-Bayoumi's wife began receiving regular stipends, often monthly and usually around $2,000, totaling tens of thousands of dollars..."
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

$2000 a month? You could earn that working at McDonald's, with a little overtime.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom