FAO Gravy

[RedIbis]

Gravy ignores your failed posts; now he can see what you do best.

If he ignores it, how can he see it?

 

[kookbreaker]

Obviously the NWO hastily organized a big party to distract people away from Gage's presentation.

This needs a comic strip. Someone get Horatius.

 

[beachnut]

If he ignores it, how can he see it?

The answer is in your obsession. your signature super expert 911 scholar for truth (aka lies and delusions)

Gage, he must be as sharp as the rest of 911 truth sympathizers.

 

[RedIbis]

The answer is in your obsession. your signature super expert 911 scholar for truth (aka lies and delusions)

Gage, he must be as sharp as the rest of 911 truth sympathizers.

Clear as usual.

 

[TexasJack]

Does this mean you have a competing theory?

That question is ignored every single time. His silence is amusing.

 

[DaveThomasNMSR]

So ... to get his attention all you did was start this thread on a forum he hasn't been contributing to for a very long time?

All I was doing is calling Mark's attention to the fact that "Box Boy" Gage is finally linking to archives of their debate. If he wants to comment or react or what have you, that's up to him. He can certainly handle Gage and cohorts on his own. I was just pointing out a striking new example of Gage inanity, FWIW.

DT

 

[DGM]

That question is ignored every single time. His silence is amusing.

It reminds me of my son when he was six. I'm just waiting for the "Na-huh" defense.

 

[chillzero]

All I was doing is calling Mark's attention to the fact that "Box Boy" Gage is finally linking to archives of their debate. If he wants to comment or react or what have you, that's up to him. He can certainly handle Gage and cohorts on his own. I was just pointing out a striking new example of Gage inanity, FWIW.

DT

I take it that means 'yes - that's all I have done to try and get his attention'.

You aren't really trying then, are you? If you want to call someone's attention to something it is kind of pointless to use a medium they don't use any more. Would you go back and shout into your old primary school room to bring an old classmate's attention to something in adult life?

 

[bill smith]

All I was doing is calling Mark's attention to the fact that "Box Boy" Gage is finally linking to archives of their debate. If he wants to comment or react or what have you, that's up to him. He can certainly handle Gage and cohorts on his own. I was just pointing out a striking new example of Gage inanity, FWIW.

DT

This was Gravy's reaction here on the jref right fter the bebate on Hardfire with Richard Gage. Somebody gave it an amusing title.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3789539&postcount=128 beotch,beotch,beotch

 

[Mr.Herbert]

All I was doing is calling Mark's attention to the fact that "Box Boy" Gage is finally linking to archives of their debate. If he wants to comment or react or what have you, that's up to him. He can certainly handle Gage and cohorts on his own. I was just pointing out a striking new example of Gage inanity, FWIW.

DT

Mark last posted in the 9/11 Threads back in September. He has not posted on the JREF Forum since December.

Obviously, the NWO has him on more important projects.

 

[BenBurch]

I emailed his business email, I'll let you know if he replies.