DC
Banned
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2008
- Messages
- 23,064
Which one?
there is only one Conspiracy Theories section.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=91
Which one?
Yes.
I hadn't realised you were posting non sequiturs.
there is only one Conspiracy Theories section.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=91
Of course... I am asking which one is a "nonsense"... Which article you think is non-sense?
all of them, especially those from Prisonplanet.
Bigotry against information...?
![]()
Not all sources are equally credible, SnakeTongue: that is something you have to keep in mind when using the internet
Yes, Fiona, I am aware of that.
But credibility is in the eyes of the beholder.
I trust everyone here have enough critical thinking to read and made it own decisions.
I think I am not harming anyone by presenting different point of views.
Perhaps Infowar.com is not a source you can trust, but the articles there sometimes have more references to be verified than the news article from the mainstream media.
yes i am bigoted against lies and unproven claims, propably because i fell for that nonsense for a while. Also believed I have to warn others of the alleged Fasle Flag attacks i knew of in advance, strangely hey never happened. And i knew Cheney had a nuke and will use it...
Relax...
This is the Internet.
If you feel uncomfortable with such social events in the cyberspace, you should leave.
Until you present solid evidence which proves that such social phenomenon is causing damage in the real world, I will keep my mind open to speculate and debate possible outcomes.
![]()
why then are you against Politicans abusing terrorism warning as a tool for their agenda, but you have no problem with Prison planet et all doing the same for their agenda?
if you feel like a fool because one day you trust in Infowar.com, you cannot blame or force other people to feel like you feel, got it?
I do not even care what label the information bear. I care about the information, the congruency of the text, the semantic, the references, the proprietary names included.
That is why I do not really care which agenda the politicians or Alex Jones have... I am concerned with the information itself.
if you feel like a fool because one day you trust in Infowar.com, you cannot blame or force other people to feel like you feel, got it?
I do not even care what label the information bear. I care about the information, the congruency of the text, the semantic, the references, the proprietary names included.
That is why I do not really care which agenda the politicians or Alex Jones have... I am concerned with the information itself.
http://tinyurl.com/27zau95What "non sequiturs" means?
Even if the information is wrong?
How do you prove the information is wrong by observing it over a digital screen?
In the cyberspace is no such thing of right and wrong information. It is just information and every reader should use discernment to understand what the information means.
What can be quite right to my context of information, can be quite wrong to your context of information.
By the way, interesting avatar...
A raging clue is if it's from the prisonplanet or infowars domains.How do you prove the information is wrong by observing it over a digital screen?