Speaking of, in several other threads here, there is this insanely long back and forth going on, either about dark matter, or magnetism, or electric currents, or all of it thrown together. Every time something about electricity/magnetism (EM) is presented, the gravity people insist on all kinds of evidence to explain it.
Or just outright dismiss everything. It depends. One of the things plasma cosmologist/Electric Universe proponents, I'm not quite sure what to call them, proposed, long ago, was that the earth and sun are connected my magnetism, and that charged particles flow from the sun to the earth through these lines.
It explained both the amount of energy, as well as how particles could accelerate after they left the sun, on their way to us. Which was an extraordinary claim. (It was widely dismissed, ridiculed and ignored by most "experts" on the sun). Calls for evidence on the matter ignored the simple fact that without a way to measure and observe such an event, how could you show evidence?
No matter, the really smart people insisted it couldn't happen, and they knew what was going on out there. Remember, this isn't very far above our heads we are talking about. It is on the front doorstep, astronomically speaking. Now that we have the satellites and ground based observations, we know that the EM theory was correct, and indeed there are GIANT magnetic ropes connecting us to the sun, and charged particles do accelerate down them, and we know a lot more than we did.
For more,
see this thread.
So when I see people wondering about the different readings for gravity, (which are very very small, but still huge compared to what was expected), I keep an open mind. We know very little about gravity. And nobody, not the smartest people in the world have figured it out yet. (No no, not the Laws of Gravity, how it works).
That the two most fundamental forces have no effect on each other at all, has baffled every serious researcher, since science discovered them.
Anyone who claims to know something new about these matters, is going to be asked for extraordinary evidence. (Not proof, nobody uses that word in science, except maybe math).
for stating basic facts about physics I didn't know and don't understand. I certainly never studied GR, let alone taught it, but I'm sure everyone else is wrong.