• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Explosives built into WTC!!

one must ask why the NWO let out sooo many people in the WTC?

why not just kill them all?
 
You guys are acting like they would have to go into the towers to make them blow up. Ever hear of remote detonators? Great critical thinking!
 
knife fight colobus said:
You guys are acting like they would have to go into the towers to make them blow up. Ever hear of remote detonators? Great critical thinking!
Click to expand...

Radio and wire-based detonators are subject to radio interference. The North tower antenna pumped out 100s of kilowatts of power and was within the "not safe" distance listed in the blasting manuals for all of both towers.

The antennas were put in a couple years late but they were planned from the start. There are two possibilities:

- The explosives were installed during construction and the NWO demolition crew kept their fingers crossed when the antennas were first fired up.

- People were found that would take their chances installing the ignitors and hooking up the explosives after the antennas were pumping out power.
 
Last edited:
Edx said:
LOL

I came accross this somehow.

It seems even truthers are skeptical judging from some of the comments :D

http://www.rense.com/general48/chargesplacedinWTC.htm
Click to expand...

Hmmm. You think?
In order to prevent further loss of life and property damage, all U.S. manned and unmanned spacecraft (except the Apollo lunar module) had self-destruct systems built in. I would expect builders of skyscrapers in densely populated areas would have them built in too for similar reasons.

Sometimes these explosive devices can be triggered by accident. Although it was a faulty o-ring in one of the two attached solid fuel rockets that was responsible for the Challenger explosion, it was, in my opinion, the self-destruct system that accidentally triggered which destroyed the space shuttle so completely and the reason for the loss of the seven astronauts. The two seemingly intact solid fuel rockets continued to fly erratically on their own for nearly half a minute before they were destroyed too after their self-destruct system was triggered from the ground.

There is another comment which is supportive to the article.

The other two comments are somewhat questioning of the veracity of the article, one of whom is basing it on the spelling of the word "gage" versus "gauge". Evenly split, overall.

McHrozni
 
bill smith said:
Suppose a builder informs his insurance company that he wants to erect the two biggest Towers in te world right in the centre of lower Manhatten ? His insurance company might have misgivings abut what would happen if one or both of those Towers should fall over for whatever reason on top of all that other billion-dollar prime real estate.

So some bright spark might suggest that secure access hatches to critical structural members be built in during construction with wiring and control included. Then in the event of a pending collapse the explosives could be plugged in and the building could be brought down in a much smaller space causing far less death and destruction and- more importantly- financial liabilty.
Click to expand...

Riight , because the insurance company would believe that prewiring the building for explosive detonatation would help keep it safer over the years than it would be without it...................!

The wiring could be electronically tested frequently.



What's more they would not go shouting about it from every street corner either for who likes to work in a building that is wired for demolition.
Click to expand...

How does one get to be in this secret society of insurance company, building demolition wiring testers? Is there a secret handshake too?
 
I wonder who's job it was for the last 30 years to maintain Bill's little bomby-poos? And who do you get to run in there and plug them in in the last hour? And why not warn the fire department/police that your engineer says the building is about to collapse? Gosh. So many questions. To bad truthers never ask any questions about their own stupid theories.
 
He explained that as the buildings are being built, explosive charges are being incorporated into the structures at key floor joint locations.
Click to expand...

Ah, so thats how they brought those tons of supersilent explosifs into the towers.

Damn, the NWO must be working on this plan for a very long time.

And again, this plan was a bit risky. What if there would be a fire in the towers? Remember?: fire + bombs --> bad idea

But, wait a minute, there was actually a fire in the North Tower in 1975 and nothing happend. Hmm, must be some kind of magic bombs.

And there was even a seconds time, when, not only the north tower was on fire, no, even the south tower burned like hell. You know, that was that stupid day, when planes flew into the towers....

knife fight colobus said:
You guys are acting like they would have to go into the towers to make them blow up. Ever hear of remote detonators? Great critical thinking!
Click to expand...

Yeah, of course. Look out your window, because now I blow up your car.

...


And? Nothing happens? Maybe thats because you still have to plant a bomb in it. Damn, I have to get some of those NWO magic bombs. :rolleyes:
 
parky76 said:
who is he shilling for? hmmm?
Click to expand...

I was being sarcastic :(.

To not be off topic, I really can't see meeting a Truther that would actually make this argument. And I don't consider BS a Truther anymore.
 
Unsecured Coins said:
like I said, there isn't a theory about 9/11 that Bill doesn't think is plausible
Click to expand...
I don't claim that this is what happened on 9/11 perticularly but I do think this , or a variation on this might well have been considered by isurance companies in the skyscraper business. It does have a certain amount of logic going for it.
 
How often were these explosives changed out? You know, since explosives have a shelf life out in the open of about 3 days. Even less in uncontrolled atmospheres??


Why would they even consider this idiotic plan, since, as far as I can tell, it has never happened before......
 
As soon as you show me the logic in prewiring a 110 story building for demolition, and can show me what explosive wouldn't degrade over time, and how in the bluest of blue hells 50,000 people would willingly work next to god knows how many tons of explosives and not bring this up to anybody... maybe I would agree with you.

This is where you point out the logic.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom