Explosives built into WTC!!

[Edx]

LOL

I came accross this somehow.

It seems even truthers are skeptical judging from some of the comments

On day, as the lead consultant engineer was in my lab talking just about "stuff", I asked him, "Sometime in future, in 50 years or so, how are these Twin Towers are going to be taken down as tall as they were going to be and as tight as land is in a crowded city, without causing fast destruction to other buildings?"

He was standing upright. He outstretched his right arm with his palm down. And said, "Bam, bam, bam, bam, bam, bam" as he lowered his hand down one imaginary floor at a time. All the way down to the floor. I knew that we had to certify these commutators to be able to operate continuously for 50 years without service or repair as our part of the contract. He explained that as the buildings are being built, explosive charges are being incorporated into the structures at key floor joint locations. So, that when the first charges are set-off at the top floors, they will take that floor down to the next. And the charges at that floor will take it down to the next floor. This will continue all the way down. The Twin Towers will come straight down like a stack of pancakes. When the buildings get old and no longer useful or profitable to have and maintain, all it will take is a phone call to take them down.

http://www.rense.com/general48/chargesplacedinWTC.htm

 

[cyclonic]

Why would anyone willingly work in building that has explosives pre-rigged into each floor?

OH MY GOD! an electrical storm is coming! run for the subway!

Explosives with a 30 year life?

Whats next? indian fakirs hired from the streets of bombay to bring down the towers with magic?

 

[Wildy]

I read that page and was surprised to not see any mention of C4 coated rebar.

 

[bill smith]

Suppose a builder informs his insurance company that he wants to erect the two biggest Towers in te world right in the centre of lower Manhatten ? His insurance company might have misgivings abut what would happen if one or both of those Towers should fall over for whatever reason on top of all that other billion-dollar prime real estate.

So some bright spark might suggest that secure access hatches to critical structural members be built in during construction with wiring and control included. Then in the event of a pending collapse the explosives could be plugged in and the building could be brought down in a much smaller space causing far less death and destruction and- more importantly- financial liabilty. The wiring could be electronically tested frequently .

What's more they would not go shouting about it from every street corner either for who likes to work in a building that is wired for demolition.

 

[DGM]

Suppose a builder informs his insurance company that he wants to erect the two biggest Towers in te world right in the centre of lower Manhatten ? His insurance company might have misgivings abut what would happen if one or both of those Towers should fall over for whatever reason on top of all that other billion-dollar prime real estate.

So some bright spark might suggest that secure access hatches to critical structural members be built in during construction with wiring and control included. Then in the event of a pending collapse the explosives could be plugged in and the building could be brought down in a much smaller space causing far less death and destruction and- more importantly- financial liabilty. The wiring could be electronically tested frequently .What's more they would not go shouting about it from every street corner either for who likes to work in a building that is wired for demolition.

By a group that's sworn to secrecy (including the insurance companies and the builder)?

 

[Architect]

I read that page and was surprised to not see any mention of C4 coated rebar.

My first thought too......

 

[Wildy]

Suppose a builder informs his insurance company that he wants to erect the two biggest Towers in te world right in the centre of lower Manhatten ? His insurance company might have misgivings abut what would happen if one or both of those Towers should fall over for whatever reason on top of all that other billion-dollar prime real estate.

Usually builders try to ensure that they won't fall over or whatever. It's kind of the way that they stay in business, you know, because people don't want to hire a builder who builds really crappy skyscrapers.

So some bright spark might suggest that secure access hatches to critical structural members be built in during construction with wiring and control included. Then in the event of a pending collapse the explosives could be plugged in and the building could be brought down in a much smaller space causing far less death and destruction and- more importantly- financial liabilty. The wiring could be electronically tested frequently .

Yes, because that's completely logical.

What's more they would not go shouting about it from every street corner either for who likes to work in a building that is wired for demolition.

Or perhaps nobody said anything about it because it's completely illogical?

 

[Pardalis]

Please tell me Bill isn't actually considering this?

 

[defaultdotxbe]

So some bright spark might suggest that secure access hatches to critical structural members be built in during construction with wiring and control included. Then in the event of a pending collapse the explosives could be plugged in and the building could be brought down in a much smaller space causing far less death and destruction and- more importantly- financial liabilty. The wiring could be electronically tested frequently .

so in the case of a disaster like, say, a jumbo jet slamming into the building, in order to prevent a uncontrolled collapse someone has to run into this building, which is on fire and in danger of collapse, to "plug in" high explosives on 220 stories to bring it down in a controlled manner?

and this really makes sense to you?

 

[Unsecured Coins]

Please tell me Bill isn't actually considering this?

like I said, there isn't a theory about 9/11 that Bill doesn't think is plausible

 

[tsig]

My first thought too......

3" rebar on 4'centers.

 

[Trojan]

Darn, I just built a shed in my back yard, knew I forgot something.

Honey, were did I leave that nanothermite paint?

 

[Pardalis]

like I said, there isn't a theory about 9/11 that Bill doesn't think is plausible

Except of course, the one involving Islamic terrorists.

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

Please tell me Bill isn't actually considering this?

bill smith will consider anything that causes people to waste time and energy responding to him...

so in the case of a disaster like, say, a jumbo jet slamming into the building, in order to prevent a uncontrolled collapse someone has to run into this building, which is on fire and in danger of collapse, to "plug in" high explosives on 220 stories to bring it down in a controlled manner?

and this really makes sense to you?

The biggest problem is the same that accompanies anything coming out of the Truth Movement: a severe and obvious contradiction between the words they speak and write... and reality.

One has to assume that this "revelation" is an attempt to explain the "obvious" use of explosives in the destruction of both Towers. The article claims the explosives were meant to allow the buildings to be quickly demolished without damaging other, nearby buildings, and yet we all know that didn't happen on 9/11. Quite a few buildings were severely damaged, and many more suffered some kind of damage, as a result of this alleged "safe" method of demolition.

So, either this alleged method actually wasn't so safe... or it wasn't used.

 

[tsig]

so in the case of a disaster like, say, a jumbo jet slamming into the building, in order to prevent a uncontrolled collapse someone has to run into this building, which is on fire and in danger of collapse, to "plug in" high explosives on 220 stories to bring it down in a controlled manner?

and this really makes sense to you?

We're the NWO we run into burning building when even the fire fighters run out.

Fools/Angels.

 

[Justin39640]

I don't get why he is implying (in the article, not the local BS) that cause they make commutator ends that his lead engineer would have any expertise in explosives that last 50 years manufactured in the 60s or worked on any such device while in the commutator end manufacturing business.

I would think that, if anything, a letter from a relay coil winding engineer (lol) would have a better insight on detonators made to last that long.

I liked this made up crapola:

The jet airliners crashed into each one on the Twin Towers and, thirty minutes later, the phone call was made and the first tower was taken down...and then the second tower was taken down. By the way, the other buildings of the complex were going to be a liability and no longer of use. So a phone call was made and they went down as well.

Yup had nothing to do with 1 and 2 falling on them
question:
All the buildings were destroyed but only 3 actually collapsed with partial collapses on others? That's what I remember off the top of my head. Sounds like someone owes someone a refund.

 

[Pardalis]

So how many buildings around the world have this built-in demolition sequence we should be worried about, Bill?

 

[Thunder]

i am starting to believe that the 9-11 truthers on JREF are not actual truthers, but simply charicatures of Truthers.

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

So how many buildings around the world have this built-in demolition sequence we should be worried about, Bill?

Every one that's part of a high-profile event.

 

[Pardalis]

I wonder why the Deutsche Bank building didn't implode as well, why go through all the trouble of dismantling it when it already had all these planted explosives to make the demolition easier?