Explosion at the Boston Marathon.

It looks like Jeff Bauman (the man in the picture showing him in a wheelchair with horrific leg injuries) helped ID the attackers, or at least one of them.

Just before 3 p.m. on April 15, Bauman was waiting among the crowd for his girlfriend to cross the finish line at the Boston Marathon. A man wearing a cap, sunglasses and a black jacket over a hooded sweatshirt looked at Jeff, 27, and dropped a bag at his feet, his brother, Chris Bauman, said in an interview.

Two and a half minutes later, the bag exploded, tearing Jeff’s legs apart. A picture of him in a wheelchair, bloodied and ashen, was broadcast around the world as he was rushed to Boston Medical Center. He lost both legs below the knee.

“He woke up under so much drugs, asked for a paper and pen and wrote, ‘bag, saw the guy, looked right at me,’” Chris Bauman said yesterday in an interview.

Those words may help crack the mystery of who perpetrated one of the highest-profile acts of terror in the U.S. since the 2001 assault on New York City and the Washington area, one that killed three people and wounded scores.

While still in intensive care, Jeff Bauman gave the FBI a description of the man he saw, his brother said. Bauman’s information helped investigators narrow down whom to look for in hours of video of the attack, he said.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-...n-iconic-photo-helped-identify-attackers.html
 
Last edited:
This thread has taken a disturbing turn.

Posting blurry photos and playing "spot the bomber." Jesus Christ.

I don't think it is wrong to do that.

As long as people are taking care not to start making accusations and to make their conclusions tentative. I'm pretty sure the police will also be working with what video and photographic evidence they have to determine who left what bags and where.
 
And the FBI, apparently.

Really? I kind of think their decision said something more along the lines of "we need help so let's allow everybody on the planet to look over the photos/video" - you know, solving a crime by global committee.

ETA: Like I said before, I think this will backfire on the FBI. I fear they will waste precious time, resources, and manpower tracking down false leads and whatnot; and in the process there will be far too many innocent people implicated in the resulting dragnet. You can disagree - won't stop me from criticizing the decision.

And, once again, I really hope I'm wrong.
 
Last edited:
No, I'm saying that what you and many others here are doing is akin to what Bigfoot hunters do all the time. Yet some justify it by calling it "critical thinking" - just as the Bigfoot hunters do.

I don't think it's akin to Bigfoot hunting. Bigfoot hunters have to prove that their quarry even exists. In this case there is every reason to believe that the bombers could appear in the crowd given that the bombs were in bags that weren't there at the start of the race. That means that someone could, in principle, be seen arriving with the bag and leaving without it.
 
If you look at the video, I think it's clearer that the backpack on white hat guy has to be the same one near the mailbox.

Also, I think the FBI says that #2 dropped the bag near the mailbox.

Also, also, Jeff, the very badly wounded guy in the wheel chair, apparently saw white hat guy drop the pack and gave a description.

Speculation of course, but the FBI put the info out there so the public could analyze it and try to recognize the two and obviously, the FBI would also like us to find other pics if we can.

Wasn't Jeff at the first bomb site, not the second?

In which case, he would have seen the black-capped guy drop the bag, not the white-capped guy. I could be wrong, but that's the impression I have.

ETA: Guess I was wrong. The above excerpt clearly mentions the grey hoodie, so it must have been the second bomb that injured Jeff.
 
Last edited:
Is it possible to draw preliminary conclusions with less than complete information? Yes.

Is it possible to revise those conclusions in light of new information? Yes again.

It's something we critical thinkers like to call "the scientific method".

No; the scientific method is the entire process of forming a hypothesis, testing it, and then drawing a conclusion about the hypothesis from the data gathered.

What's happening in this thread is people making a lot of uneducated guesses which none of us is in a position to test even if they could rise to the level of actual hypotheses. What is happening here has nothing to do with the scientific method.
 
If Also, also, Jeff, the very badly wounded guy in the wheel chair, apparently saw white hat guy drop the pack and gave a description.

Jeff actually described black hat guy looking at him and placing the bomb bag at his feet.
 
Yup.

Let us know when you crack the case.

my only contribution to this thread was to say the child in the photograph looks like the one that was killed.

i have more posts here addressing you! and thats too many already.

im really not that interested in justifying it or not, to you.
 
Really? I kind of think their decision said something more along the lines of "we need help so let's allow everybody on the planet to look over the photos/video" - you know, solving a crime by global committee.
Almost like America's Most Wanted, or posters in the Post Office, which as we all know never helped catch any criminal.
 
Wasn't Jeff at the first bomb site, not the second?

In which case, he would have seen the black-capped guy drop the bag, not the white-capped guy. I could be wrong, but that's the impression I have.

I think Jeff saw Suspect 1 (Black Hat), since some reports say he mentioned sunglasses.
 
Really? I kind of think their decision said something more along the lines of "we need help so let's allow everybody on the planet to look over the photos/video" - you know, solving a crime by global committee.

ETA: Like I said before, I think this will backfire on the FBI. I fear they will waste precious time, resources, and manpower tracking down false leads and whatnot; and in the process there will be far too many innocent people implicated in the resulting dragnet. You can disagree - won't stop me from criticizing the decision.

And, once again, I really hope I'm wrong.

Whoops! I responded to the wrong post. I meant to reply to the post I have now quoted.

I think it is an interesting way to go about it. Whether or not it works is yet to be determined.
 

Back
Top Bottom