Oh, you people slay me.
I don't understand your comment. The quote makes perfect sense to me.
Athon
Oh, you people slay me.
and what exactly are these effective therapies?For one thing, it implies that we have not yet discovered the cause of depression, and that we need to discover new, effective therapies.
If we already knew the cause of depression and possessed effective therapies, that would have been a rather odd thing to say, don't you think?
Major depressive episodes can be triggered by a major life event. The cortisol connection makes sense as a trigger anyway.I was checking out Bob Park's "What's New" column which is archived here, and noticed that there is new research. I did a search in the News and found it written up here:
http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=512936
Just thought you might be interested.
If that is the case, then I have no issue. Any ethnic group can have a higher incidence of some genetic variation. It's only when you start to attribute broader behavioral or physical characteristics to a "race" that my skepticism increases.... why are you questioning it on account of 'similar genetics'. There's a lot of evidence supporting the fact that ADHD is due in part to genetic variation. Aborigines simply have a higher occurance of this variation. ...
Athon
Not if you are aware all forms of depression are not equal. The causes are many. Effective therapies exist but are not ideal for everyone with depression.For one thing, it implies that we have not yet discovered the cause of depression, and that we need to discover new, effective therapies.
If we already knew the cause of depression and possessed effective therapies, that would have been a rather odd thing to say, don't you think?
I don't know about that. In my background it was probably a choice between rotting in a debtors prison, being hung as a horsethief, starving in Ireland or the balmy Atlantic cruise. Depending upon where they originated....Given the way that the north american continent was settled I have wondered if that led to bipolar people leaving europe and moving to the US.
Still working on those sources.
What could be the evolutionary advantage of being able to suffer from depression? I'm not referring to clinical or severe depression, which would simply be an abnormal extension of 'normal' depression. I mean why would an organism feel a sense of loss or defeat to the extent that their normal behavioural functioning is impeded?
No reason why I'm pondering this. I feel great.But it just struck me today after considering past experiences with severe depression that I couldn't think of a reason why we could suffer from it.
Athon
I don't know about that. In my background it was probably a choice between rotting in a debtors prison, being hung as a horsethief, starving in Ireland or the balmy Atlantic cruise. Depending upon where they originated.
I doubt they said, "OK, now all you bipolars, up the gangplank."
Maybe that hunk would have been a better choice 10,000 years ago. In this era I'd have been better off with a rich brainy type.
I don't know if anyone's made this point, but here goes.
Depression in humans is often accompanied by low seritonin levels. Low seritonin is also a mark of adulthood in many (if not all) mammalian species. The result of lower seritonin levels in the wild is that adults are more cautious and aggressive than youngsters, and thus are given a clear survival advantage.
Humans are unusual in that they are pedomorphic (retain childlike attributes into adulthood), so low seritonin in human adults is maladaptive.
Also, possibly pertinent - I recall reading in cognitive and social psychology books that people who are feeling depressed perceive the world in a more objectively correct way than do people who are not depressed. (That is to say, they are less subject to biases of observation.) Is this correct and, if so, could depression be a means of driving people to change toward a more realistic appreciation of their situation in life?I don't know if anyone's made this point, but here goes.
Depression in humans is often accompanied by low seritonin levels. Low seritonin is also a mark of adulthood in many (if not all) mammalian species. The result of lower seritonin levels in the wild is that adults are more cautious and aggressive than youngsters, and thus are given a clear survival advantage.
Humans are unusual in that they are pedomorphic (retain childlike attributes into adulthood), so low seritonin in human adults is maladaptive.
Also, possibly pertinent - I recall reading in cognitive and social psychology books that people who are feeling depressed perceive the world in a more objectively correct way than do people who are not depressed. (That is to say, they are less subject to biases of observation.) Is this correct and, if so, could depression be a means of driving people to change toward a more realistic appreciation of their situation in life?
I don't know if anyone's made this point, but here goes.
Depression in humans is often accompanied by low seritonin levels. Low seritonin is also a mark of adulthood in many (if not all) mammalian species. The result of lower seritonin levels in the wild is that adults are more cautious and aggressive than youngsters, and thus are given a clear survival advantage.
Humans are unusual in that they are pedomorphic (retain childlike attributes into adulthood), so low seritonin in human adults is maladaptive.