Steve
Penultimate Amazing
I saw the above caption on a sign outside a church on my drive to work this morning. After some thought I still have absolutely no idea what the author is trying to say. I thought I would share it anyway.
Posted the OP years ago. Today, same church, the sign reads "Christianity must evolve or die". IMO this does not exactly cast the "truth" of the Christian bible in a favorable light. If Christianity is such a wonderful thing why would its adherents think it has to change in order to survive?
Isn't the frequent criticism that Christianity is hidebound and tied to archaic understanding of the universe? Why fault them for taking steps in the right direction?
Not every Christian is a literalist.
It honestly reminds me of the Glen Beck thing about the difference between evolution and revolution ...
LOLGeln Beck discovers the letter "R".![]()

Irrelevant to what, exactly? Christianity, like all religions (and all nations, corporations, and girl scout troops), are exactly what their members make of it. So what if it evolves and changes? The United States has changed a lot in just 200 some years, does that invalidate America's legitimacy? Our reliance on the Constitution?If, by "the right direction" you mean away from the 2,000 year old roots of their religion then I wonder how far they would have to "evolve" in order for the founding principles of Christianity to become irrelevant.
And this is a good thing, isn't it?Or has this already happened? It seems apparent to me that current Christianity, in all its myriad forms and denominations, bears little resemblance to the Christianity of 2,000 years ago.
When the Christians that make it up decide it does. See Smith, Joseph.So if "evolving" is a natural trait of Christianity when does it stop being Christianity and start being something else?
For my money, I'm not really going to give a guano if the religion is true or correct to its original form and count it as a win they're tending away from crusades and inquisitions. YMMV.If the religion was true or correct in its original form then "evolution" would not be necessary, or even desirable.
o/t .... speaking of guano, I was always curious of Batman's guano had any special abilities or uses?For my money, I'm not really going to give a guano if the religion is true or correct to its original form and count it as a win they're tending away from crusades and inquisitions. YMMV.
o/t .... speaking of guano, I was always curious of Batman's guano had any special abilities or uses?
Posted the OP years ago. Today, same church, the sign reads "Christianity must evolve or die". IMO this does not exactly cast the "truth" of the Christian bible in a favorable light. If Christianity is such a wonderful thing why would its adherents think it has to change in order to survive?
My view: with nearly every change in society's moral consensus, the devoutly religious must be dragged kicking and screaming into it. They struggle against moral progress mightily, fighting tooth and nail, and proclaiming all the while that X is destructive, sinful, and base. Eventually, after the vast majority of the populace has finally come to accept X, the devout so often manage to convince themselves that X has always been the natural position of their religion, even if their religious leaders still condemn it every day.
I'm sure that 50 years from now, Christians will be claiming they were always supportive of gay rights while atheists used evolution to justify discriminating against gays.
Not every Christian is a literalist.