Not really, if schools teach about the theory of evolution but not the theory of intelligent design.
It always seemed to me that at the K-12 level there are obvious workarounds. In science class you learn about the history of science, so why not just state that "Darwin theorized that species developed through a process of natural selection"? That's a fact, even if kids aren't explicitly told, "Darwin was right."
I don't even mind a curriculum saying that "many people disagreed with Darwin, based on their religion, but instead put forth a theory of 'intelligent design' saying species were tailored by a creator." It becomes pretty clear that ID doesn't suggest further lines of inquiry, while Darwinism does.
Why do they need to be taught that? Is it necessary to understanding the science? If not, why include it in a science class?
Sometimes "history of science" is valuable for making the science more interesting, or putting it into a more accessible context, but I don't see how that applies here.
I mean, when we teach the theory of relativity do we need to point out that Anders Lindman thinks it's a conspiracy by shadow powers to hide knowledge of free energy from the public while scaring them with what he thinks is a non-existent nuclear bomb? Personally I think high school science classes are there to teach science, in whatever way they can most efficiently do that.
