Evidence for Thelema.

This is starting to read like the OP has been butthurt by a diagnosis of mental illness and decided that it can't possibly true, ergo everybody else is wrong. Oh, and a overweening tendency to hyperbole and use of false equivalence.

The whole Crowley thing is just a stalking horse, a smokescreen to disguise simplicity of the cause and motive.

Take your medication, son.
 
The point is that Computer Simulation and Multiverses are accepted in academia.

For the multiverse, it is consider one possible interpretation for what we see in QM because it, just like the other postulated interpretations, agree with the available evidence. Although nobody in science has ever claimed that any one QM interpretation is the correct one. That is because there is no set of evidence which supports only one, while excluding the others.
 
You're right. There's no paradox at all. Zeno didn't understand how infinitesimals summed up. He's describing a situation where Achilles is slowing down as he approaches the tortoise, perhaps because he knows Hector has a blue shell. I guess you could also make a case that he's describing a function with an upper limit; but it certainly isn't describing a case where Achilles is running at a constant rate. It's not a "paradox", it's just incorrectly understood.

I don't think that's a knock against Zeno given that this is probably the earliest surviving speculation about sums of infinite nonzero numbers, but it's like seeing modern people puzzled by "paradoxes" in a flat-earth cosmos. It's not a paradox; it's an argument the assumptions are incorrect.

Aand [/thread]
Actually, just shut the internet down. We are done here.
 
As stated before Uncle Crowley would be laughing his butt off over someone making claims about Thelema being a religion!

A personal journey of exploration, but hardly a religion
 
I'm running under the assumption that Thelema and Aleister Crowley are well known, in a pop-cultural sense of the word. I think that's fair.

Nope, It's not a fair assumption at all. It's like assuming all Muslims in the Middle East know about the Old Testament / New Testament Covenant differences. It may SEEM like a reasonable assumption from within your own culture and mindset, but stepping out into the real world reveals it's a dumb thing to assume.

Most people outside neo-pagan circles have a tangential knowledge of Crowley at best, and I doubt there are many people, especially in the USA, who even know what the term "Thelema" means in that context.
 
Most people outside neo-pagan circles have a tangential knowledge of Crowley at best, and I doubt there are many people, especially in the USA, who even know what the term "Thelema" means in that context.
Until this thread, I had heard of Crowley only once, and Thelema not at all.
 
Until this thread, I had heard of Crowley only once, and Thelema not at all.



I have a lot of pagan friends. I was already familiar with the concept of Thelema and how it is frequently abused by sadists.

Crowley is a contentions personality. His research was shoddy and and his writing pretentious swill. Most the pagans I know describe him as the inept researcher who popularized pagan concepts enough for more competent researchers and less egotistical thinkers to carry on.

He's a regrettable patriarch.

Of course I would never dream of attributing these attitudes to all pagans. That would be stupid. He has many devoted adherents, especially among novices.
 
This post got moved a couple of times, because the moderators didn't think it was relevant. It is because it contains evidence for the existence
of 'occult' phenomena. The last time I posted it, it was in response to someone who tried to ridicule Thelema, just to show that there's more to
Thelema than 'hogwash'.

I can provide evidence for the 'occult' as well. (Hint : Show me the money!!!)
The point is that there are remarks in this revealed document, Liber 418, that speak of the relation between contradiction and continuity
and Zeno's Arrow Paradox. Much of this knowledge was beyond what was known at the time and certainly beyond Crowley's knowledge, as Crowley himself
acknowledges many times in the Book; The communicating entity also says this over and over. 'utterly beyond thine understanding'
The Book was revealed after the performance of Sex Magick Rituals. The fact that it's communicating knowledge beyond the capabilities of the
receiver proves the communicating entity legit, in this sort of Operation.

Let's start with Achilles and the Tortoise. Achilles is very fast, so the Tortoise is given a head start in their little competition.
Now, whenever Achilles moves, the Tortoise moves as well. Slower maybe, but he still moves. And since there's never a moment where Achilles moves and the
Tortoise doesn't advance his position, from this Zeno concluded that Achilles could never overtake the Tortoise. And since there's obviously no such
problem in the real world, you have a paradox. So what's wrong? Measure is improperly defined. Measure or lenght, area and volume, cannot be defined
by summing points on the real line. A line might be composed of an infinite number of points, you cannot define the length of a line in this way without
running into paradox. A proper measure function, that obeys the rules of summation, needs to be defined. Then the Achilles/Tortoise problem disappears.
There's also another way to remove the paradox using smooth infinitesimal analysis, where a point doesn't have zero measure, (which is the source of the
paradox, that a point has dimension zero,) but infinitesimal measure. And summing points as infinitesimals is an integral, obeying the rules of a proper
measure.
(For those of you interested in my Religious theory, you might want to check out Liber 418 by Aleister Crowley, The Cry of the 5th Aethyr.
The Vision of the Arrow therein described is a version of Zeno's Arrow Paradox, but whereas the paradox can be resolved by relaxing the law of excluded
middle (smooth infinitesimal analysis), the Vision describes a higher problem of the continuum to be resolved by relaxing the law of no contradiction.)

Later in the discussion I wrote this :

The physical sciences are now becoming so nonsensical, they really can't laugh at Scientologists any more. That would be almost, but not quite,
completely hypocritical of them. And now Crowley's system actually has more evidence going for it.
Are there any books about Magical Simulation Programmers talking about interesting Philosophical or Mathematical issues that weren't known before?
(And before you think I believe in Angels or Gods, I don't. I think the further step in understanding the Universe will turn out to require
Aesthetics, so the Deities are like literary devices. I'm presenting a new Logic Theory.)

Thoughts?
The Mods were clearly right!!!!!! Hope this helps!!!!!
 
I wonder if there is any evidence for Thelema? The thread title seems to suggest there might be. I wonder what that might be? Anyone? OP?
 
I wonder if there is any evidence for Thelema? The thread title seems to suggest there might be. I wonder what that might be? Anyone? OP?

Well, apparently it's deep, requires study and post #31 answers everything. That's what I got from this thread.
 
It comes up a lot in marine biology. Mainly by ROV.



Is this the proof?

p0FMd7E.jpg
 

Back
Top Bottom