euthanasia and a better society

Kumar said:
Self Death(samadhi) without attaining salvation/Moksha can just be "sucide", weakness, murder, running from the duties, cowardness & so on. It can't be peacefull here or there.

Cease to exist, by definition, cant be either peaceful nor unpleasant. Your ego, your personality, your memories are no more. A deep Samadhi (a true Samadhi) will show you this while you are still alive. There is nothing to reach, there is no Moksha, there is nothing to do but to return to what we were "before" birth.
 
Bodhi Dharma Zen said:
Cease to exist, by definition, cant be either peaceful nor unpleasant. Your ego, your personality, your memories are no more. A deep Samadhi (a true Samadhi) will show you this while you are still alive. There is nothing to reach, there is no Moksha, there is nothing to do but to return to what we were "before" birth.

I meant samadhi till death. On salvation/Moksha, we need not to see "before" birth or "after" death. It is just free from all bondages which exist in & around you pre-salvation.
 
Kumar said:
"GOD" is a mass existing concept in well distributed public since long & it is thought/noted by these mass....public. He has allowed us & taught us to do "goods". He has initiated all to do good. Doctor's interfearances for goods should be ok but I can't say interfearances for bads.

Is it not indicative here that skepticism is leading to 'pro-euthanasia/sucidal/murder thoughts.

NO, skepticism does not lead to "pro...blah blah blah".

There are plenty of non-skeptics that have commited all the above. More non-skeptics than skeptics by far.

I think you have a very closed mind and warped way of thinking about cause and effect.

Just because so many people believe in gods does not mean they exist. Again, you have a warped way of thinking things into "existance".

Euthanasia can be the much better than dying in pain if the system is not abused. Using science and common sense can aid in this...skeptical and critical thinking.

You are not capable of utilizing science without abusing it. You are not able to post without generalizing skepticism and insulting it.
 
Eos of the Eons said:
NO, skepticism does not lead to "pro...blah blah blah".

There are plenty of non-skeptics that have commited all the above. More non-skeptics than skeptics by far.

I think you have a very closed mind and warped way of thinking about cause and effect.

Just because so many people believe in gods does not mean they exist. Again, you have a warped way of thinking things into "existance".

Euthanasia can be the much better than dying in pain if the system is not abused. Using science and common sense can aid in this...skeptical and critical thinking.

You are not capable of utilizing science without abusing it. You are not able to post without generalizing skepticism and insulting it.

Can you explain how negative thoughts, unbearable sentiments, voilent actions & reactions, sucidal thoughts, cowardness, dificulty in sustaining etc. are developed, scientifically? What biochemical changes leads to these?

Bodhi,

Just think ' euthanasia at will with happyness' AND ' euthanasia due to all negativities, adversities, pain etc'. Difficuty to sustain life without fullfilling duties can be cowardness/running from the duties or weakness. Better find ways to live, sustain, correct or attain salvation without unbearable pains, sentiments or otherwise.

Doctor/healer defination is "on who restore, repair or heals. one skilled or specializing in healing arts; especially : a physician, surgeon, dentist, or veterinarian who is licensed to practice : a person who restores or repairs things.

How does practice of euthanasia by a doctor/healer can fit within the scope of above definitions? There can be some other words/person which are meant for this purpose.
 

Back
Top Bottom