• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Emerging Cult in New Zealand

gtc

Philosopher
Joined
Feb 23, 2005
Messages
7,110
New Zealand is home to a Christian group known as the Destiny Churches led by 'Bishop' Brian Tamaki and his wife, 'Pastor' Hannah. They operate a number of churches in New Zealand and at least one in Australia. A partial history of the church can be found here and here. Unsurprisingly, the church preaches a prosperity gospel and a socially conservative message.

The Bish and Hannah have been criticised for their lavish lifestyle, allegedly funded by badgering their followers into tithing 10% of their income lest they be under a curse.

In 2005 an allied political party won 0.6% of the vote at a NZ election but the party fell apart before the 2008 election (despite a divine promise that they would be ruling the country by 2008).

The church is also attracting attention for its desire to create a township within Auckland that would cut off its church members from the rest of the community.

But what has really attracted attention has been the news this week that he has managed to convince 700 male followers to swear their loyalty and submission to him as their 'spiritual father' 'God's chosen man' and promising spiritual rewards for those who 'honour' him with 'surprise gifts'. They are also expected to stop Tamaki's critics 'in their tracks'; to protect him from outsiders and to loudly affirm him when he preaches in order to build "an atmosphere that is conducive to supernatural events".

It will be interesting to see how this pans out.

This thread was prompted by Atheist's post in this thread.
 
I couldn't see anything in the links about how a "church" is defined in NZ. Do you know if it gets tax breaks, is protected from vilification by law and that sort of thing? Because it sure looks like a cult undeserving of any special status. (Yes I know it can be strongly argued that no church deserves special treatment, but that's another issue).
 
They sound like people I could really despise if I tried hard enough.

Apparently there's a scandal of church-condoned adultery with a mr Bilby in the leading role, confessing his sins and being appointed training director of the church :

http://www.rickross.com/reference/destiny_churches/destiny_churches1.html


Bilby is on holiday in Bali but a spokeswoman for Brian Tamaki said the church was comfortable with the position he held in the church.
 
I liked this, though:

Destiny TV may have lost its weekday morning slot on TV2, but the programme's producers have vowed to find a way to keep Destiny Church leader Brian Tamaki on air.

Mr Tamaki's show has been dropped by the Government-owned network, and its 6.30am slot has been filled by Buzz and Poppy, a New Zealand-made television show that chronicles the exploits of two adventurous huhu grubs.*

http://www.rickross.com/reference/destiny_churches/destiny_churches5.html


*of the Huhu beetleWP
 
I continue to be amazed by the likes of people who can join these cults. Brain dead people.
 
I continue to be amazed by the likes of people who can join these cults. Brain dead people.

Or lost people; or desperate people; or lonely people. Have a bit of charity/empathy/whatever.
 
Looking at the Koresh cult, I didn't seem to see (amongst the survivors) lost, desperate or lonely people.

None of these is likely to make a rational man give up all sexual activity with his wife, while allowing full access to the cult leader, while he fathers children with many wives. That's not lonely; that's dumb.
 
There's more.
Here's a story of a $45,000 loan.
http://www.rickross.com/reference/destiny_churches/destiny_churches3.html

my bolding
...After the Sunday Star-Times began investigating the loan this week, Destiny Church moved to settle the debt. It says it will be paid at the end of the month.

A letter sent to the paper, signed by Tamaki's wife Hannah and the church's communications adviser Janine Cardno, said: "We are sorry that the loan and communications of progress that should have flowed readily were non-existent, and we have now resolved the problem to everyone's satisfaction."

Barry Wilson, 75, said he doubted he would have seen the balance of the money so promptly if the Star-Times had not got involved.

"It would have gone on for another 10 years if nothing had been done. If they had been more responsible to the people who support them most, they wouldn't have got tied up in this mess."

Wilson said he had repeatedly called on Brian Tamaki to repay the money.

"He (Tamaki) wouldn't talk to me, he'd put me on to his lawyer all the time. It got to the stage where he wouldn't take my calls." He said he had decided not to take Tamaki to court because despite everything, he still believed the televangelist was doing a "damn good job" of God's work.

"I really wouldn't want to push him to court because I really don't want to offend God that much."

Wilson lent the money, which he had received from the sale of his nautical clothing label Line 7, in the mid-'90s, on the understanding that it be used for the purchase of a block of land in Rotorua and the construction of a church. The interest was 10%. The couple moved to Australia and say they learned "by accident" that the project had been cancelled, the land sold, and the money used on a new project, the renovation of Rotorua's Odeon cinema.
 
New Zealand is home to a Christian group known as the Destiny Churches led by 'Bishop' Brian Tamaki and his wife, 'Pastor' Hannah. They operate a number of churches in New Zealand and at least one in Australia. A partial history of the church can be found here and here. Unsurprisingly, the church preaches a prosperity gospel and a socially conservative message.

Does "socially conservative" mean "rabidly homophobic"?

I presume the prosperity is all Brian Tamaki's.

The Bish and Hannah have been criticised for their lavish lifestyle, allegedly funded by badgering their followers into tithing 10% of their income lest they be under a curse.

Fair enough; god needs cash, and since they can't give it directly to the god-thing, next best choice is His Royal Highness Brian Tamaki.

In 2005 an allied political party won 0.6% of the vote at a NZ election but the party fell apart before the 2008 election (despite a divine promise that they would be ruling the country by 2008).

Don't be fooled by the basic numbers - Tamki is as cunning as a ****-house rat and his plan for Density to enter Parliament is a lot more sophisticated than you might casually think.

Tamaki has been getting families to move to a certain area for some years now and I'm quite sure his intention is to win that one electorate as a start. Probably won't be ready in 2011, but 2014 is a good show as the church continues growing.

The church is also attracting attention for its desire to create a township within Auckland that would cut off its church members from the rest of the community.

See above - it's being driven politically rather than for any other reason.

But what has really attracted attention has been the news this week that he has managed to convince 700 male followers to swear their loyalty and submission to him as their 'spiritual father' 'God's chosen man' and promising spiritual rewards for those who 'honour' him with 'surprise gifts'. They are also expected to stop Tamaki's critics 'in their tracks'; to protect him from outsiders and to loudly affirm him when he preaches in order to build "an atmosphere that is conducive to supernatural events".

It will be interesting to see how this pans out.

Well, I have for some years been asking how long until Tamaki claims to either be a god, or at least directly descended from one.

Bishop Tamaki doesn't like me.

The most worrying thing about Density is not the cult-like nature of it, nor the cult-leader worship of Tamaki, but more the clear violence which is threatened by both words and actions.

Tamakis followers wear black shirts, which gives a nicely ironic picture, given the original blackshirts' nature.

They did a haka at the entrance to Parliament a few years back as an anti-gay protest, and let me tell you, every poofter in Welly stayed well out of the way of 500 young Maori men displaying violent gestures towards their kind.

I couldn't see anything in the links about how a "church" is defined in NZ. Do you know if it gets tax breaks, is protected from vilification by law and that sort of thing? Because it sure looks like a cult undeserving of any special status. (Yes I know it can be strongly argued that no church deserves special treatment, but that's another issue).

It is a registered church just as is the RCC.

That won't change, and for two reasons:

1 John Key cannot upset Maoridom as they form the backbone of his support.
2 Even "moderate" Maori are first and foremost Maori, so the old "My borther and I against my cousin" comes into play, and at the first sign of legal action against Density, we'd be knee-deep in gang members siding with the church, arms linked with Tame Iti.

I continue to be amazed by the likes of people who can join these cults. Brain dead people.

Correct!

That said, most of them were born brain dead, being almost exclusively from decile 1.

Or lost people; or desperate people; or lonely people. Have a bit of charity/empathy/whatever.

Lonely, desperate and lost people have lots of places to go, especially in a welfare paradise like NZ.

______________________________________________________________


gtc - I hadn't started a thread here because it's pretty obvious that no matter what happens, neither Tamaki nor his adherents will listen to an atheist, or bunch of atheists, attacking them. I know - I attacked him for years and all I had to show for it was a pile of death and miscellaneous other threats.

The blame for Tamaki's church falls squarely on the shoulders of "mainstream" christianity, which almost all church members have broken away from.

Maori have had their own church for well over a century - the Ratana Church, an offshoot of Anglicanism originally. It is largely to blame for thr Density fiasco by introducing leader-worship in churches. In fact, it seems a peculiarly NZ thing for congregations to worship their leaders. (Read, brown NZ thing, as I don't see it outside Polynesian and Maori churches.)

I have started a couple of threads on the subject of Tamaki at christian boards, because the overriding fact to date has been the deafening silence of those mainstream churches to say a bad word about Tamaki and his blackshirts.

The clear message from theists is that the god's desire is for people to have free will and choose whichever church they want, so it's not their problem.

They will not attack Tamaki; the Ratana and other churches will not tell the members that they are wrong and extend an olive branch for the membership to change back to a "normal" church, and the govrenment will do nothing.

Accordingly, I am taking the only sensible approach:

The members are all just thick coons of no consequence, **** 'em. Why should I care that several thousand Maori are being ripped off by another Maori?
 
Looking at the Koresh cult, I didn't seem to see (amongst the survivors) lost, desperate or lonely people.

None of these is likely to make a rational man give up all sexual activity with his wife, while allowing full access to the cult leader, while he fathers children with many wives. That's not lonely; that's dumb.

This thread is not abut David Koresh. There is no suggestion that he has done anything of that sort.

People get sucked into cults for all sorts of reasons. This church gives an appearance of being a fairly normal Pentecostal church and many of its teachings and practices appeal to traditional cultural practices (see TA's post).
 
Does "socially conservative" mean "rabidly homophobic"?

Why, yes it does. But let's not forget sexist (except for the Bishop's wife, who appears to be the brains of the outfit).

I presume the prosperity is all Brian Tamaki's.

Oh yee of little faith.


Don't be fooled by the basic numbers - Tamki is as cunning as a ****-house rat and his plan for Density to enter Parliament is a lot more sophisticated than you might casually think.

Tamaki has been getting families to move to a certain area for some years now and I'm quite sure his intention is to win that one electorate as a start. Probably won't be ready in 2011, but 2014 is a good show as the church continues growing.

I hadn't thought about that. If he wins an electorate he can probably bring a few more MPs in from his list (as ACT did last year).

Bishop Tamaki doesn't like me.

That's a suprise.

Tamakis followers wear black shirts, which gives a nicely ironic picture, given the original blackshirts' nature.

I don't think they recruit on the basis of intelligence.


gtc - I hadn't started a thread here because it's pretty obvious that no matter what happens, neither Tamaki nor his adherents will listen to an atheist, or bunch of atheists, attacking them. I know - I attacked him for years and all I had to show for it was a pile of death and miscellaneous other threats.

The blame for Tamaki's church falls squarely on the shoulders of "mainstream" christianity, which almost all church members have broken away from.

Maori have had their own church for well over a century - the Ratana Church, an offshoot of Anglicanism originally. It is largely to blame for thr Density fiasco by introducing leader-worship in churches. In fact, it seems a peculiarly NZ thing for congregations to worship their leaders. (Read, brown NZ thing, as I don't see it outside Polynesian and Maori churches.)

I have started a couple of threads on the subject of Tamaki at christian boards, because the overriding fact to date has been the deafening silence of those mainstream churches to say a bad word about Tamaki and his blackshirts.

The clear message from theists is that the god's desire is for people to have free will and choose whichever church they want, so it's not their problem.

They will not attack Tamaki; the Ratana and other churches will not tell the members that they are wrong and extend an olive branch for the membership to change back to a "normal" church, and the govrenment will do nothing.

Accordingly, I am taking the only sensible approach:

The members are all just thick coons of no consequence, **** 'em. Why should I care that several thousand Maori are being ripped off by another Maori?

Thanks.

I can't see how his Pentecostal brethren can stand up to him. They have to fear his followers but they are preaching a similar message and fleecing their followers in pretty much the same way.
 
do they use Cool aid (or flavour aid) in any capacity at their meetings yet
thats always a danger sign yanno
;)
 
I can't see how his Pentecostal brethren can stand up to him. They have to fear his followers but they are preaching a similar message and fleecing their followers in pretty much the same way.

Exactly!

I'd love to take you for a drive around South Auckland, where the poorer an area is, the larger and more impressive the mega-churches are.

Then I could introduce you to families who give money to their church then go the foodbank to get food for their kids. By no means is Density the only one ripping off the poor.

To be honest, if Tamaki were a Polynesian, he wouldn't face half the scrutiny he does. On that note, another group who has been deafeningly quiet is the Maori Party. Big surprise to me.

:bgrin:
 
I have started a couple of threads on the subject of Tamaki at christian boards, because the overriding fact to date has been the deafening silence of those mainstream churches to say a bad word about Tamaki and his blackshirts.

The clear message from theists is that the god's desire is for people to have free will and choose whichever church they want, so it's not their problem.
Eh? 'The clear message'? Bollocks. I have read plenty of bad words about Tamaki from Xtians.
 
Eh? 'The clear message'? Bollocks. I have read plenty of bad words about Tamaki from Xtians.

So have I.

On the other hand, if you can find an official condemnation from a church spokesman, then give it a go.

Your pals at SoF have been able to come up with some airy-fairy stuff from two years ago, but since then, nada. Show me the Ratana church and Archbishop of Aotearoa shaming them and I'll believe ya.

A few Pommy voices willing to call him a dirty word doesn't count as any kind of condemnation at all, in my view.
 
So have I.

On the other hand, if you can find an official condemnation from a church spokesman, then give it a go.

Your pals at SoF have been able to come up with some airy-fairy stuff from two years ago, but since then, nada. Show me the Ratana church and Archbishop of Aotearoa shaming them and I'll believe ya.

A few Pommy voices willing to call him a dirty word doesn't count as any kind of condemnation at all, in my view.
Awright, I did wonder if you only meant official words, but your assertion just said 'theists' in a blanket way.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom