I've posted a link to a Boston Globe report that she changed her status to Native American at two different colleges. So "ticking the box" wasn't just a mistake because she did it twice in different places at different times. She intentionally wanted them to think she was an Indian and not just a rich white woman.
When I said 'ticking the box was a mistake' I didn't mean she
accidentally ticked the wrong box. I meant it was a mistake to do it at all.
Why would they think she was a "rich white woman" when she wasn't rich and didn't come from a rich family? She grew up in a lower middle class family. I do so love it when a person doesn't know someone yet claims to know what s/he was thinking or what his/her intentions were.
Everyone knows her DNA does not prove she is a Cherokee or any of her ancestors were of any American Indian Tribe, and that distant ancestor could very will be from south of the border. It proves nothing meaningful in her assertion that she is part Cherokee. Just do a search on it because it was reported all over. The small percentage of the relevant DNA is not enough for her to make the claims she has made about being a Native American or a Cherokee, or even partially.
That distant ancestor is highly unlikely to be from south of the border unless you can show that any of her ancestors married someone with an Hispanic last name. Seeing how people moved east to west during that time period, it's highly unlikely.
Dr. Bustamante disagrees with you regarding her having Native American ancestry:
“the results
strongly support the existence of an unadmixed Native American ancestor” six to 10 generations ago"
Hmmm...now who are we to believe? The genetics expert or BrooklynBaby?
Here's a link that shows her DNA was compared to samples from Mexico, Columbia, and Peru -- not Native Americans.
That's because N. American Natives have not participated in genetic studies giving geneticists enough data. But NA genes have similar markers no matter whether they are from Alaska or South America. Unless you think some pure Indian (unadmixed) from Mexico or S. America made his/her way up to where Warren's family was living 150 years ago, it's far, far more likely that ancestor is from that area.
The Cherokee Nation says DNA can't prove she is Cherokee and she has nothing she has produced nothing to change that.[/QUOTE]
DNA can't prove ANY
tribal affiliation. But the DNA test does prove she has Native American ancestry. Whether it's Cherokee or Delaware or Creek or Sequoia doesn't really matter as she has never claimed to be an actual member of a tribe. She has only ever claimed what her family told her growing up.