Electric universe theories here.

Status
Not open for further replies.
you make soooo easy....


Tell me about Interstellar medium and the Heliosphere.

Any plasma?
 
you make soooo easy....


Tell me about Interstellar medium and the Heliosphere.

Any plasma?

Answer the question. What has Marklund got to do with anything? Stop changing the subject to yet another one that you have no idea about.
 
Hannes Alfvén showed that elements with the lowest ionization potential are brought closest to the axis, and form concentric hollow cylinders whose radii increase with ionization potential
Marklund convection


This implies the existence of a discrete set of virtual concentric cylindrical surfaces (see Figure 3). These surfaces are centered on the z-axis of the field-aligned current.
Don Scott

We observe this.

300px-The_Twin_Jet_Nebula.jpg
ESA/Hubble
 
Last edited:
Marklund convection


Don Scott

We observe this.

[qimg]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e6/The_Twin_Jet_Nebula.jpg/300px-The_Twin_Jet_Nebula.jpg[/qimg] ESA/Hubble

A planetary nebula! What has that got to do with electric universe woo? Is that the one that the idiot Scott claims is some sort of z-pinch woo? Lol. Have a look at the Doppler measurements. Z-pinches don't do that! So, all you have is pretty pictures. No science. Thought so.
 
Sol88, there were quite a few posts to this thread overnight (for me). It seems that you were not very successful in presenting the case for electric universe theories.

May I make a suggestion?

Start with just one thing, and present a strong, scientific case. Using the results from independently verified experiments and observations. Preferably from peer-reviewed papers in relevant journals.

Here’s a good place to start:

No, you are bang on the money...no plasma in a universe that is 99.6% plasma!

<snip>
What is the evidence that plasma comprises 99.6% of the universe?

In your response post, please be sure to make it clear what the 99.6% is of. For example, mass?

Also, what definition of plasma are you using?
 
No, but you need a plasma for these mechanisms to work, correct?why split hairs!

"These mechanisms"? What are "these mechanisms", and what qualifies as working? Because standard astrophysics includes plasmas and electromagnetic effects. The EU crowd tries to substitute electromagnetism for gravity and even fusion, and whenever they do, it fails. Quantitative analysis for EU theories always proves them wrong. That's why EU proponents usually stop at the level of pictures and diagrams, and never go further.

Gravity is a very limited tool box.

Gravity is only part of standard astrophysics.
 
Oh Ziggy, Ziggy Ziggy

An overlooked piece of the solar dynamo puzzle



A previously unobserved mechanism is at work in the Sun's rotating plasma: a magnetic instability, which scientists had thought was physically impossible under these conditions.

Puzzle???

I mean just jump in the deep end for love of jebus...
It is, nonetheless, known that magnetic instabilities are crucially involved in many processes in the universe.

Differing rotation speeds in different regions and complex flows in the sun's interior combine to generate the magnetic field. In the process, unusual magnetic effects can occur—like this newly discovered magnetic instability.

Then, that’s when the EU mob :bwall

Like a rubber band:wwt , the magnetic field connects neighboring layers that rotate at different speeds. It accelerates the slow particles of matter at the edges and slows down the fast ones on the inside. There the centrifugal force is not strong enough and the matter collapses into the center.

And achieved squat,
With its various specialisms in magnetohydrodynamics and astrophysics, the interdisciplinary research team has been investigating magnetic instabilities—in the lab, on paper and with the aid of sophisticated simulations—for more than 15 years.

Magneto hydrodynamics is incorrect. This has been show to be the case at.....comet 67P and it’s interactio with the solar wind.

The two connected....maybe. ;)

So we see 15 years of sophisticated computers simulation as the better option?

Electric fields not mentioned, I see.
 
Last edited:
Parts of Sol88’s post on electric universe theories, the topic of this thread ...

Sol88, Why don’t you post at least one electric universe publication, preferably a peer-reviewed paper, on this?
 
Ignorant parroting of the Thunderbolts cult prophets and insults from Sol88

You are really starting to show your ignorance. ...
Ignorant parroting of the Thunderbolts cult prophets, delusions and insults from Sol88.

Donald Scott is a rather deluded retired electrical engineer who is a mainstay of the demented Thunderbolts cult. Part of the delusion of the Thunderbolts cult is that Birkeland currents appear everywhere they imagine they appear. Real Birkeland currents are "a set of currents that flow along geomagnetic field lines connecting the Earth’s magnetosphere to the Earth's high latitude ionosphere.". Birkeland currents have only been detected around Earth. It is a reasonable assumption that Birkeland currents exist in other cases of aurora that we see, e.g. at Jupiter. There is no evidence of Birkeland currents existing elsewhere. A rational person would think about the conditions needed for the existence of Birkeland currents - a solar wind, a strong, specific magnetic field as from a planet, an ionosphere.

Donald Scott lies about “magnetic flux-ropes" which are not Birkeland currents. Magnetic flux ropes are literally magnetic fields in the form of ropes :eye-poppi! For example, Signatures of Magnetic Flux Ropes in the Low Solar Atmosphere Observed in High Resolution.

Sol88 lies that Donald Scott predicts anything about supermassive black holes when Scott writes about his delusions about Birkeland currents which are only known to exist around Earth.
 
Last edited:
Yet another lie from Sol88 when he has not cited any EU

Counter rotation observed accounted for by the Electric Universe.
Yet another lie from Sol88 when he has not cited any EU accounting for counter rotation of disks around a supermassive black hole.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom