• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Elbe Trackway

WGBH said:
Yep I'm a bleever and that is the exact question I have been asking since I first saw the pictures. Has anyone noticed that most of the pictures have been removed from the original BFF Elbe thread?
Click to expand...

they're covering their butts, thats why, and they have the agenda of advancing the church. If you get me.
 
WGBH said:
Yep I'm a bleever and that is the exact question I have been asking since I first saw the pictures. Has anyone noticed that most of the pictures have been removed from the original BFF Elbe thread?
Click to expand...

And you have to ask? They tend to remove the obvious that causes great embarrassment.
 
OntarioSquatch said:
Is that what you guys call logical fallacy? There are animals being discovered every now and then that have had no record. Animals need to exist before they are even discovered.
Click to expand...

LOLOL....you are so funny OS. That would be your logical fallacy. Forty plus years and counting, we are still waiting.
 
Jodie said:
Forty plus years and counting, we are still waiting.
Click to expand...


I always say it is about 400 years and counting. I start the clock when the Europeans came here who would have paid special attention to giant hairy wild ape-men and any artifacts that Indians may have had. These people would have killed a Bigfoot right away.

It is my opinion that neither Native Americans, European explorers nor the permanent immigrant settlers were never ever able to acquire and present any confirmatory Bigfoot artifacts because none of those peoples ever came into possession of such things because Bigfoot never did exist as an actual creature in more than 400 years. These people would have killed a Bigfoot right away. Additionally, there is no evidence that a Bigfoot type creature (as described by the believers) has ever lived in North America at all.

IMO, the only meaningful reason why we can properly say that Bigfoot doesn't exist is because we haven't found one in over 400 years and under conditions in which we would have found one if they really did exist.

we are still waiting
Click to expand...

You are? :rolleyes:

Modern people would kill a Bigfoot right away. Nobody has because they do not exist.
 
Last edited:
Even once someone kills a Sasquatch. It won't guarantee that they will be discovered and accepted.

If the natives killed one 200 years ago, we would never have proof that it actually happened. At the very most we would have a story.
 
If a female Bigfoot really does look like Patty then humans would have shot those things dead long ago. Actually, if Bigfoot really existed, I think we would have exterminated them like any other nasty feared creature (bears wolves) and we would have tons of bones, pelts, preserved tissue, whole bodies, photos, film, etc.

Maybe there would have been moves to stop their extinction, or some populations were never effected, but regardless we would have confirmatory evidence of their existence even after they went extinct.

Those factors are dramatically different as compared to other big discoveries like gorillas, okapis, coelacanth, etc. There is no equivalent discovered animal that the believers can point to with proper analogy.
 
OntarioSquatch said:
Even once someone kills a Sasquatch. It won't guarantee that they will be discovered and accepted.

If the natives killed one 200 years ago, we would never have proof that it actually happened. At the very most we would have a story.
Click to expand...

Same thing when the Souix killed and ate Tyrannosaurs. They ate them and had nothing to show us in the end. None of those Indians saved any of the parts even though they killed and consumed them for many thousands of years. They just didn't care, didn't know, or both.

But you are right and only a dull thinker would say that Tyrannosaurs are extinct. They don't know. And momma said... don't say if you don't know.
 
Last edited:
They tackled mammoths, including the huge Columbian, but ran away from bigfoot.

Big buffalo were no worry. Big bears, no worry.

They attacked each other and kept trophies. Sometimes even eating the losers.

But bigfoot, no...
 
LTC8K6 said:
They tackled mammoths, including the huge Columbian, but ran away from bigfoot.

Big buffalo were no worry. Big bears, no worry.

They attacked each other and kept trophies. Sometimes even eating the losers.

But bigfoot, no...
Click to expand...

They attacked the pale folk from over the sea, who were in possession of GUNS.

But Bigfoot ... nooo.
 
I have a new question for you Tontar - if you are so inclined.

Have you seen the recent Bigfoot Times article regarding the Elbe Trackway?

Oh, and that other question I have about your involvement with the Elbe Trackway.....
 
I confess, it was me.... I hoaxed both the Elbe AND the London Trackway. Me and Rick Dyer have been having a blast just a hoaxing it down the road, but you were too smart for me Cotter. Ya got me, you got "The Tater"
 
Cotter said:
I have a new question for you Tontar - if you are so inclined.

Have you seen the recent Bigfoot Times article regarding the Elbe Trackway?
Click to expand...

No I have not. Have you? If so, how about posting a copy of the relevant parts.
 
Cotter said:
Oh, and that other question I have about your involvement with the Elbe Trackway.....
Click to expand...
I was just wondering, why do you keep asking him that question? It sounds like you have some kind of obsession and what business is it of yours anyway?








I Am He
 
Any thoughts on the BFT article Tontar?

Pretty pointed, eh?

Would you be willing to comment on your involvement (or lack thereof) of the Elbe Trackway?

@I Am He - We have a situation here, where a member may be deliberately producing unreliable information. I am simply asking him if he was involved.

I think it should be all of our businesses as to who is or is not truthful or who is or is not out there producing unreliable evidence.

Thx.
 
I can't believe the BF Times named a forum poster, and didn't produce any evidence to support the involvement of that poster.
 
Cotter said:
Any thoughts on the BFT article Tontar?

Pretty pointed, eh?

Would you be willing to comment on your involvement (or lack thereof) of the Elbe Trackway?

@I Am He - We have a situation here, where a member may be deliberately producing unreliable information. I am simply asking him if he was involved.

I think it should be all of our businesses as to who is or is not truthful or who is or is not out there producing unreliable evidence.

Thx.
Click to expand...
It's difficult to produce reliable evidence of the existence of an imaginary animal.
I also find your insistence on asking Tontar questions about his involvement a bit curious. Are you involved yourself in this joke in a way or another?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom