Alferd_Packer
Philosopher
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2007
- Messages
- 8,746
No, and?
Ronulans tend to be idealistic and gullible.
I'm willing to bet that all of this guy's past associations are being looked at really closely right now.
No, and?
Ronulans tend to be idealistic and gullible.
I'm willing to bet that all of this guy's past associations are being looked at really closely right now.
When did he lie to Congress?
RayG
On March 12, at a hearing of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Sen. Ron Wyden asked Director of National Intelligence James Clapper: “Does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?” Clapper answered: “No, sir.” And Wyden reiterated the question, “It does not?” Clapper responded: “Not wittingly. There are cases where they could, inadvertently perhaps, collect — but not wittingly.”
Ronulans tend to be idealistic and gullible.
I'm willing to bet that all of this guy's past associations are being looked at really closely right now.
Whistleblowing: The disclosure by a person, usually an employee in a government agency or private enterprise, to the public or to those in authority, of mismanagement, corruption, illegality, or some other wrongdoing.
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Whistleblowing
What the government is doing is not illegal.
Whistleblowing: The disclosure by a person, usually an employee in a government agency or private enterprise, to the public or to those in authority, of mismanagement, corruption, illegality, or some other wrongdoing.
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Whistleblowing
What the government is doing is not illegal.
Er, that seems almost tautological.
Whistleblowing: The disclosure by a person, usually an employee in a government agency or private enterprise, to the public or to those in authority, of mismanagement, corruption, illegality, or some other wrongdoing.
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Whistleblowing
What the government is doing is not illegal.
Funny how he is hiding in China. If you want to talk about draconian monitoring and censorship, alk he hss to do is look out the window.
I imagine that the Chinese inteligence agencies will have him over for a "friendly" talk soon.
Funny how he is hiding in China. If you want to talk about draconian monitoring and censorship, alk he hss to do is look out the window.
Gullible? He blew the whistle on an extensive government spying program at significant risk to his own life. Isn't that the opposite of gullible?Ronulans tend to be idealistic and gullible.
I'm willing to bet that all of this guy's past associations are being looked at really closely right now.
Gullible? He blew the whistle on an extensive government spying program at significant risk to his own life. Isn't that the opposite of gullible?
It's weird how "Ronulan" is an insult here considering everything he predicted keeps coming true.![]()
Whistleblowing: The disclosure by a person, usually an employee in a government agency or private enterprise, to the public or to those in authority, of mismanagement, corruption, illegality, or some other wrongdoing.
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Whistleblowing
What the government is doing is not illegal.
Definite whistleblower.
It is clear that Americans have no adequate understanding of their 4th amendment rights when it comes to digital communications and that the government has been acting in secret to collect information which many Americans believe violates their 4th amendment rights. It is high time that a debate was triggered which leads to a clear definition of these rights in terms of digital communication, so Americans can be happy that their rights are not being violated in secret by the NSA. As this release of documents triggers such a debate, Snowden's activities are certainly in the public interest.
What the government is doing is not illegal.
If the government's actions are not illegal, then how can revealing them be illegal?
I'm not sure that the Supreme Court would agree with your interpretation of the 4th Amendment. I believe that it ruled way back in 1979 that the collection of telephone records by the govt. does not violate the 4th Amendment.