And it's on the Internet, which makes even more truer!
Michael
I'm the reincarnation of Gregory Rasputin, and I tell it's a lie!
But they haven't convinced Cayce's organization, the Association for Research and Enlightenment: "At the present time, A.R.E. does not believe that Edgar Cayce has returned." See http://www.edgarcayce.org/question_answers.asp#ecrencarnI found this through a google ad, and thought it was interesting enough to post here. Apparently, Edgar Cayce has been reincarnated as a guy named David Wilcock. And it must be true. After all, they've convinced Uri Geller.
You should team with Dylan Avery to develop the Grand Unified Theory of Conspiracy.A.R.E probably isn't getting any share of the profits, thus they aren't going to endorse this guy.
Where is your evidence? Avery can't document his claims about 9-11 and you can't document yours about the ARE and Cayce.There is no conspiracy involved. The A.R.E. makes money by perpetuating mythology. They don't condone this other guy's claims because they aren't getting paid to.
Where is your evidence?
An analysis with which I am much inclined to agree. Problem is, TBK, that you've just indicated why a lack of endorsement by the A.R.E. does not constitute evidence that Wilcock isn't Cayce reincarnate.A.R.E probably isn't getting any share of the profits, thus they aren't going to endorse this guy.
I found this through a google ad, and thought it was interesting enough to post here. Apparently, Edgar Cayce has been reincarnated as a guy named David Wilcock. And it must be true. After all, they've convinced Uri Geller.
I can always count on you to overwhelm me with evidence.The evidence is that they aren't perpetuating fact.
I can always count on you to overwhelm me with evidence.![]()
So you're conceding that your assertion that "[t]hey (the ARE) don't condone this other guy's claims because they aren't getting paid to" is merely speculation?Evidence of my speculation?! Are you dense?