Merged "Eco-Fascist Snuff Movie"

CoolSceptic said:
But that's the thing: when a scientist, by their very nature, sees an anomaly, they are fascinated by it, and want to investigate and understand it. If you don't share that same passion, you'd never understand.
Click to expand...

Scientists believe their are no enemies in science, only phenomena to be studied. The MMGW scientists place their political ideology ahead of science. They nuzzle up to government because that is where they get grants, but are suspicious of business that actually expects their findings to be valid.
 
TraneWreck said:
No, you really are probably the sweetest, most awesome person anyone will have a chance to talk with. It's incredible you don't have a Nobel yet.

I've seen your passion at work. Although, to be fair, it's mostly a passion for sanctimony and triviality.
Click to expand...
Lol, out come the true colours. The pettiness, the bickering. It was only a matter of time.

I know when I see half a dozen independent measurements of a variable, with non-overlapping confidence intervals, that the study has a serious problem that must be overcome before conclusions can be drawn. When the measurement method is known to introduce a bias, even more so. I appreciate you do not have the depth of understanding to realise that is a showstopper in science.

It doesn't matter if it is homeopathy, intelligent design or climate science. That's the beauty of science. When it's wrong, it is wrong. Doesn't matter what the question is.

I can try to explain the basic tenets of science to you over and over again. There is no point: nothing will change. Understanding is not an algorithmic process. Which is where we came in.

And since we have come full circle, now would be a good time to get back to talking about the original topic. Remember that? It's about the advert.
 
CoolSceptic said:
Lol, out come the true colours. The pettiness, the bickering. It was only a matter of time.

I know when I see half a dozen independent measurements of a variable, with non-overlapping confidence intervals, that the study has a serious problem that must be overcome before conclusions can be drawn. When the measurement method is known to introduce a bias, even more so. I appreciate you do not have the depth of understanding to realise that is a showstopper in science.

It doesn't matter if it is homeopathy, intelligent design or climate science. That's the beauty of science. When it's wrong, it is wrong. Doesn't matter what the question is.

I can try to explain the basic tenets of science to you over and over again. There is no point: nothing will change. Understanding is not an algorithmic process. Which is where we came in.

And since we have come full circle, now would be a good time to get back to talking about the original topic. Remember that? It's about the advert.
Click to expand...

In the 9/11 CT section of this Forum there are a lot that believe they can explain the faulty science from NIST. They also think they have the knowledge but are also too cowardice to present their knowledge. They also claim the science is wrong without presenting their "correct" science.
 
DC said:
In the 9/11 CT section of this Forum there are a lot that believe they can explain the faulty science from NIST. They also think they have the knowledge but are also too cowardice to present their knowledge. They also claim the science is wrong without presenting their "correct" science.
Click to expand...
I did spend quite a bit of time some years back debunking 9/11 CTs on some popular UK forums (not under this username) and I am very familiar with the good work in the JREF CT forums debunking troofer pseudoscience.

Also, I have presented scientific evidence on AGW on JREF. The analysis I presented was not my own, but from the peer reviewed literature. Those that understand science didn't take up the debate, instead I get people like TraneWreck who do not understand that CIs are as important as the measurement itself in science. It was possibly the most worthless discussion I have ever taken part in.

If you want to see the difference between interesting AGW scientific debate, and what you get from advocates on JREF, compare this article (from a site I recommended earlier) to a typical JREF thread, and see the difference. And if you want to debate points relating it to that article, please do it on Climate, Etc., and not on this thread.

C'mon folks. We can agree to disagree whether or not JREF is the best place to discuss AGW science. Lets get off this and back on topic. Environmentalists "humourously" blowing up children to save the planet. Remember that?
 
CoolSceptic said:
Lol, out come the true colours. The pettiness, the bickering. It was only a matter of time.

I know when I see half a dozen independent measurements of a variable, with non-overlapping confidence intervals, that the study has a serious problem that must be overcome before conclusions can be drawn. When the measurement method is known to introduce a bias, even more so. I appreciate you do not have the depth of understanding to realise that is a showstopper in science.

It doesn't matter if it is homeopathy, intelligent design or climate science. That's the beauty of science. When it's wrong, it is wrong. Doesn't matter what the question is.
Click to expand...

Miskolczi is wrong, dead wrong.
 
Denial Depot is outraged.

Eco-Fascists Wage Stasi Plan To Blow Up Non-Nazi Kids
Nazi Plans!

Shockingly offensive video released. I cannot over-exaggerate my distaste for this video enough, so much so that I am delighted to post it here on Denial Depot.



I keep playing it back again and again to maintain sufficient levels of outrage.

It's like Shock and Awe, except not even mildly entertaining. It's like the Abu Ghraib photos except this time it's actually offensive.

You don't solve disagreements by blowing people up, unless of course it's in a war and they are civilians disguised as enemy combatants. But this video isn't taking part in a war, it's in a classroom, on a flight of business-stairs and during a game of Soccerball.

The last time brown shirts tried to silence critics was in the run up to World War II when Godwin imposed a law that stated that anyone who referenced Hitler in an argument would automatically lose that argument. What happened? Hitler rode into power unopposed. Ironically, later on Hitler would literally try to silence critics with explosives.

The video raises further worrying questions that will have to be FOIed. Are eco-fascists working on the ability to detonate people they disagree with at the push of a button? What role does the Bilderberg Group play in all of this? How do they plan to get the explosives into our bodies? What is water fluoridation really about? Why are there so many strangely shaped contrails over my house? Do I need more guns?

What the Eco-Fascists need to do:

1) Apologize for their stasi-style video
2) Withdraw their Final Solution to tax co2
3) Stop calling us "Deniers" as the term offensively links us to holocaust deniers. Tritely comparing your opponent to a despised group is an outrageously underhanded and offensive debate tactic that has no place in decent society
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
It's like Shock and Awe, except not even mildly entertaining. It's like the Abu Ghraib photos except this time it's actually offensive.
Click to expand...

:eek: Shock and Awe is normally entertaining?
the Abu Graib pictures were not offensive?

wow...
 
A.A.Alfie said:
It's hard to argue with such well informed, supported and solid evidence. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

there are enough AGW Threads where you have gotten the evidence presented, where you displayed your ignorance and denial.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom