Dutch Pedo party disbands

Beerina said:
What are these properly controlled studies with older kids? That sounds like weasel words. The studies I am aware of showed no "psychological damage" to 14 and 15 year olds who had (simple) consensual sex with legal adults, much less damage "akin to being severely mauled by a dog".
Click to expand...

I had a quick look and I couldn't find the relevant article again, which is annoying.

Anyway, as I recall it the crappiest, usually early studies lumped people together without doing any controls at all and concluded that having sex when young caused all sorts of psychological damage. This was mainly because people from poorer and broken homes tended to have sex earlier and tended to have worse life outcomes.

Then people did some studies that controlled for this to a reasonable extent and found no statistically significant link between early sex and poor life outcomes.

This bugged people, so even larger and better-controlled studies were done that did show a statistically significant link between early sexual activity and depression and whatnot. As I recall it (and I can't find the study as I said) they even tried to control for things like risk-taking behaviour, although I'm generally very suspicious about the scientific validity of psychologist's attempts to measure such characteristics with questionnaires in such a way as to yield data about long-term behaviour.

As I said, there's no scientifically supported story about the cause of the increased risk of depression and whatnot. It's just a correlation, and lots of people who start having sex quite young turn out fine.

It might just be that a certain percentage of people seek out relationships that are bad for them, and that those people would be better off in a chastity belt at any age, for example. The data doesn't say.

Until better data comes along I provisionally support age of consent laws in the general ballpark of age sixteen, in about the same way that I support speed limits even though I know that they are somewhat arbitrary. However better data could come along tomorrow.
 
According to the Wiki picture of the only three members, they seem to be leaning to their right, so does that mean they're a right-to-center party?
 
Last edited:
Kevin_Lowe said:
As I said, there's no scientifically supported story about the cause of the increased risk of depression and whatnot. It's just a correlation, and lots of people who start having sex quite young turn out fine.
Click to expand...
A good speculation is that when these teens accidentally get pregnant due to poor judgment and safety measures, they would be pretty much expected to commit abortion to try to keep their activities hidden from their parents. Of if they keep their child their boyfriends would not be willing to take responsibility. Unwanted (pre)teen pregnancies having a worse implication than when older (lack of income, unfinished education) would at least have to come back in statistics. Being so young that the girls are at risk for their health if they would give birth to a child also seems traumatic.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_youngest_birth_mothers
 
This thread got me thinking about bestiality with non-adult animals of the opposite sex.
What would this be called?
 
Einzig said:
A good speculation is that when these teens accidentally get pregnant due to poor judgment and safety measures, they would be pretty much expected to commit abortion to try to keep their activities hidden from their parents. Of if they keep their child their boyfriends would not be willing to take responsibility. Unwanted (pre)teen pregnancies having a worse implication than when older (lack of income, unfinished education) would at least have to come back in statistics. Being so young that the girls are at risk for their health if they would give birth to a child also seems traumatic.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_youngest_birth_mothers
Click to expand...

Supposedly they controlled for that, and teens who were not female and/or did not get pregnant still had poor life outcomes more often than their celibate peers.
 
quarky said:
This thread got me thinking about bestiality with non-adult animals of the opposite sex.
What would this be called?
Click to expand...

"Complicated rape"
But seriously, isn't bestiality illegal altogether where you live?
 
For what its worth, I have never put peanut butter on my penis. That would be immoral...especially with Skippy brand chunky.
 
quarky said:
For what its worth, I have never put peanut butter on my penis. That would be immoral...especially with Skippy brand chunky.
Click to expand...

Many of the people who engage in bestiality with non-adult animals of the opposite sex were molested by puppies of the opposite sex themselves when they were very young. We need to break the cycle of abuse, by banning peanut butter.
 
Thanks, Kevin.

My shame for having brought this up has turned to the righteous indignation of the victimized. I can even remember the first female puppy that took liberties with me. I couldn't have been more than three years old, and she put her tongue all over my face, even making contact with my tongue. My mother was appalled, but she let the puppy stay in my room anyway.

I also recall really sharp little claws on the pup, as she had her way with me.
Years later, thanks to therapy, I recall the dog humping my leg. I was still immature, and I mistook the gesture as love. I should have known it wasn't, because there was no kissing first. Just straight to the humping.

The Poky Little Puppy.

Oh well. My folks eventually had a doctor kill that dog, when it got very old.
I don't have to worry about them killing me, though, because they are already dead.

Happy ending, anyway.
 
Oh lord, I share much love for quarky and Kevin in this thread.

I actually laughed out loud.

I'll bring the Jiffy.
 
Kevin_Lowe said:
Many of the people who engage in bestiality with non-adult animals of the opposite sex were molested by puppies of the opposite sex themselves when they were very young. We need to break the cycle of abuse, by banning peanut butter.
Click to expand...

I firmly oppose the banning of peanut butter on such specious grounds. Doing so creates a slippery slope that will result in the banning of almond butter, cashew butter, sunflowerseed butter, and hazelnut butter.

They can have my Nutella when they pry it from my cold, dead, sticky hands.
 
Yeah, let's all make fun of sexual abuse. Keep the jokes coming, they're just hilarious. I'm currently working on a "Puppies of Abu Ghraib" set.
 
 
Last edited:
Checkmite said:
*snicker*

I remember seeing some pro-pedophile site which took that angle - that they were fighting for the "sexual freedom of children in the face of age discrimination" or some such; although the site seemed to be run entirely by adults.
Click to expand...

When I lived in Abq, NM, I once confronted a member of NMBLA and he insisted that children WOULD one day be demanding their rights to have sex with deviants like him - and he kept using the words "tender" and "sweet" - such as "Their so tender and sweet at the tender age of 10 and we need to let them know that their tender sexual feelings for adults are very sweet, tender and appropriate." He maid weird 'whimpering' noises while saying 'tender' too... Ewwww... I'm creeped out just thinking about it. This guy used to be on Abq's public access TV channel all the time and was very recognizable around town because he only wore super-short cut off jeans and was tanned like an old piece of leather.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom