Gawdzilla Sama
TImeToSweepTheLeg
But, I believe, more precisely defined.
Me no math, so it wouldn't matter anyway.
But, I believe, more precisely defined.
While Kepler only has a few years of data on the star, astronomer Bradley Schaefer of Louisiana State University decided to look at photographic plates of the sky dating back to the late 19th century. To his amazement, he learned that over the last hundred years, KIC 8462852's light output has steadily faded by about 19%, something that’s “completely unprecedented for any F-type main sequence star.”
“This presents some trouble for the comet hypothesis,” Tabetha Boyajian, a lead researcher on the team that originally discovered the star, told New Scientist. “We need more data through continuous monitoring to figure out what is going on.”
Building structures to block out 19% of the starlight over a 100-200 year period, would that not present a problem too?
Bet the octopi are behind it.
That would be "pentapi" (or maybe "quintopi"?) rather than "octopi".The ones with five tentacles?
That would be "pentapi" (or maybe "quintopi"?) rather than "octopi".
This is probably a natural phenomena. Like the op I dearly wish we could find evidence of an alien civilization but try as they might astronomers can't find the evidence.
It saddens me that our own solar system only hosts one species with civilization. We may find microbes on Mars or Jupiters and Saturns moons or ever ceres or another asteroid but those life forms don't build buildings, have philosophy and science.
Are humans truly alone in the universe?
Are humans truly alone in the universe?
The union contract.Since everyone likes to snicker and post Ancient Aliens memes when artificial construction is brought up what are the alternatives now that this new evidence has been brought to light?
And, alternatively, what amount of more evidence would be needed to convince us it is an artificial construction project?
Since everyone likes to snicker and post Ancient Aliens memes when artificial construction is brought up what are the alternatives now that this new evidence has been brought to light?
D'Eyncourt @ Slashdot said:My suspicion is that what we may be watching is a relatively short-lived (meaning less than tens of thousands of years) phase of Tabby's Star evolving from a main sequence star at the very earliest stage of becoming a (super-)giant. There is just barely enough helium accumulated at its core that its fusion only fitfully begins only to sputter out when the additional heat generated by that hotter fusion diffuses that core to below helium-fusion levels. Of course this "current" sputtering was generated tens to hundreds of thousands of years ago at the core (taking that long for the scattered light to reach the star's photosphere and thus become visible to us), but when helium fusion actually takes hold then the star ballooning out to become a (super-)giant will overtake that sputtering.
The union contract.
What if it is a natural phenomenon but not one we expect?
Like if there is some sort of spaceborne life form that either evolved there or has colonized that star? That could explain the dimming and the light curve. Think of the "Star Seeds" from the Known Space universe. And there is no reason they would show up in a SETI search because they either don't use RF or they use it at very small amplitudes.
“In this case, we looked at variations in the brightness of a number of comparable stars in the DASCH database and found that many of them experienced a similar drop in intensity in the 1960’s. That indicates the drops were caused by changes in the instrumentation not by changes in the stars’ brightness.”