Craig4
Penultimate Amazing
Dunkirk? Come on. It was a defeat, but with the effects somewhat diminished by the bold and daring rescue mission.
Hans
That's probably the best way to describe it, a defeat followed by a successful rescue mission.
Dunkirk? Come on. It was a defeat, but with the effects somewhat diminished by the bold and daring rescue mission.
Hans
Oh, that idea quickly went south, but Seyss-Inquart started out with a charm offensive and little in the way of oppression - except of course against the Dutch Jews who were removed from their government jobs within a few months.The biographical record of this leader of a "civilian administration", who was finally executed for crimes against humanity, indicates that Hitler was incapable of displaying solicitude, even when it was in his interests to do so.
1943 and even then, high ranking German officials made sure that the Jews were given as much advanced warning as possible.A damned sight less harshly than he treated the Poles or the Czechs. ISTR, also, that Denmark was given particularly light-handed treatment, to the extent that it wasn't till 1942 that the Nazis started arresting and deporting Danish Jews.
Part of the reason why it went so smoothly was Hitler ordering a stop.....
Sure. It's an argument that only makes sense knowing what was to come.
You could have coexisted with Imperial Germany, and avoiding most of WWI is a benefit in its own right, but the real value lies in no Hitler, no Holocaust, arguably no Soviet Union....
Can you justify that suggestion? The Italian colony of Libya had been in its possession since taken from the Ottomans in 1911; and absent a pre-existing state of war with France and the UK it seems improbable that Italy would have encroached on Tunisia or Egypt. Likewise it doesn't seem plausible that Italy would have attacked neighbouring territories in an attempt to expand its possessions in Ethiopia, unless already at war with the colonial powers.Evan if we could have somehow avoided getting entangled in 1939, Italian expansion into North Africa would have inevitably drawn us into the war.
Can you justify that suggestion? The Italian colony of Libya had been in its possession since taken from the Ottomans in 1911; and absent a pre-existing state of war with France and the UK it seems improbable that Italy would have encroached on Tunisia or Egypt. Likewise it doesn't seem plausible that Italy would have attacked neighbouring territories in an attempt to expand its possessions in Ethiopia, unless already at war with the colonial powers.