Mirrorglass
Illuminator
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2010
- Messages
- 3,464
what is the original source for the cartoons, please?
http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0058/0058_01.asp
Another gem by Jack Chick.
what is the original source for the cartoons, please?
Christians used to tie people to stakes and burn them alive and islam cuts peoples heads off or hangs them. Why should a society let a few human deaths in the name of the Druid gods bother them?http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11457795
Now don't get me wrong, I think its a good indication of how all religions are equally silly, but in my opinion they should all be DENIED tax breaks rather than allowed them.
But more to the point, if I recall in the original form wasn't human sacrifice a rather important ritual in the religion? I wonder if they want that re-instated too
yeah you beat me to it. The jack O Lantern the Druids used was a turnip though instead of a pumpkin like jack Chick illustrated. This shows his ignorance as much as anything else he has done.
yeah you beat me to it. The jack O Lantern the Druids used was a turnip though instead of a pumpkin like jack Chick illustrated. This shows his ignorance as much as anything else he has done.
Caesar and Strabo, both of whom lived and wrote BCE, describe fairly horrific sacrificial rituals among the Gauls. Caesar recounts rites in which humans and animals were burned to death while locked inside a giant wickerwork figure, as sacrificial gifts to the gods.
Caesar specifies that "the immortal gods delight more in the slaughter of those taken in theft or brigandage or some crime, but when the supply of that kind runs short they descend even to the sacrifice of the innocent." Persons "suffering from serious illness" made up some portion of "the innocent".
So we see that ritual human sacrifice, apart from being religious in aspect, also provided a means of publicly held capital punishment. One is given to wonder, however, how Caesar could have verified these claims, which were recounted to him by his Gaulic translator.
Strabo writes that the Druids "shoot victims to death with arrows, or impale them in the temples", after which a prediction of the future would be made according to the response of the body.
Diodorus states: "... [the Druids] devote to death a human being and plunge a dagger into him... and when the stricken victim has fallen they read the future from the manner of his fall and from the twitching of his limbs, as well as from the gushing of his blood."
Other classical writers describe different methods by which the Druids committed ritual murder: hanging, stabbing, drowning. Pliny alludes to cannibalism. Lucan and Tacitus perpetuate these accounts, though they are probably just repeating what the others have already written, and exaggerating them into still more ghastly rites. (Lucan in his Pharsalia writes of "altars heaped with hideous offerings, and every tree... sprinkled with human blood". However, this was an epic poem filled with some fairly fantastical stuff; Lucan never actually travelled to Britain or Gaul.)
It is unknown whether the cited methods of execution were employed to invoke different spirits or supernatural powers, or to appease gods of differing dominions.
From the linked article:
"While sacrifice is a core notion within most spiritual traditions, within Druidry it is confused by historical accounts of the killing of both human and animal victims," [Britain's Druid Network] said in its application to the British commission. "No such practice is deemed acceptable within modern Druidry."
"What is sacrificed within the tradition today," the application says, "is that which we value most highly in life and hold to with most passion: time, security, certainty, comfort, convenience, ignorance and the like."
Isn't that a whole lot of propaganda? How reliable are these sources that all had an axe (or a sword) to grind?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11457795
Now don't get me wrong, I think its a good indication of how all religions are equally silly, but in my opinion they should all be DENIED tax breaks rather than allowed them.
But more to the point, if I recall in the original form wasn't human sacrifice a rather important ritual in the religion? I wonder if they want that re-instated too
Good.. just as planned.
[qimg]http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c322/Northernme/0058_17.gif[/qimg]
Gawdzilla, I don't take your meaning. I don't think 21st century Druids look or act "stupid". That's a matter of personal opinion, of course, to which you're certainly entitled.
As religions go, one in which the forces of nature are respected and admired, and personal individuality and creativity are encouraged and honored, strikes me as quite positive. The American Druids I've known have been educated and intelligent people, so I don't understand what you mean by "helping religion make itself look stupid is a worthy goal". Is it?
Caesar recounts the druids burning sacrificial victims alive inside wicker figures, but these were probably criminals being executed, which is somehow more palatable than that they were sacrificing innocent people to their bloodthirsty gods.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11457795
Now don't get me wrong, I think its a good indication of how all religions are equally silly, but in my opinion they should all be DENIED tax breaks rather than allowed them.