BenBurch
Gatekeeper of The Left
Taking drugs is egregious and irrational.
Therefore, Starbucks should be closed?
Taking drugs is egregious and irrational.
Taking drugs is egregious and irrational.
A big drug user then eh?
We should ban chocolate, too. And tobacco. And alcohol. This will work really well and it won't be like the 1920s AT ALL, right?
Taking drugs is egregious and irrational.
Therefore, Starbucks should be closed?
You must be a joy at parties.
Well they do kill people.
Drivel asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
Taking drugs is egregious and irrational.
Are you suggesting that enything and everything that is 'egregious and irrational' be banned. Because that's a pretty long list.
So do peanuts. You're going to have to come up with a better argument than that.
Yeah drugs are no different to peanuts. Good one. I'm convinced.
Well they do kill people.
Mmm. Yeah. Getting high. Such an indispensable freedom. Obama is a big meanie for not abolishing laws that most people want.
Well they do kill people.
DEATHS BY YEAR (2007, USA)
Alcohol = 85,000 (where's your famous tears and call for war on alco-deale*rs?)
Tobacco = 435,000 (where's your famous tears and call for war on tobacco-de*alers?)
Marijuanna = 0 (Yet here you cry like a baby, just like they programmed you to)
http://dru*gwarfacts.*org/cms/?q*=node/30
Alcohol is a factor in the following:* 73% of all felonies * 73% of child beating cases * 41% of rape cases * 80% of wife battering cases * 72% of stabbings * 83% of homicides. A lot of killing, maiming people here.
So to be consistent the Drug Wariors must put their alco-drug down and be calling for a War on Alcohol. But they don't. Because they couldn't care less. It's all a fraud and this proves it.
Using your logic, no. Hence why I said you should come up with a better argument.
A further example, utilizing your logic:
Your profile states you live in Australia. Pretty much everything in Australia can kill someone. Therefore, we should nuke Australia.