EHocking
Penultimate Amazing
Dowsing by edge - Part III
- Thread starter SezMe
- Start date
-
- Tags
- dowsing mike guska
I don't know where you come up with your information?
!0% correct in the jref office. That's one of ten
Up to 60 % in the field doing the double blind test, like in the office.
68% with my tests here and with SezMes' test 90%, given it was only one of ten.
If we ran the other nine the same way it in my opinion would still be around 90%, or better.
Because I ran the test in the field with a dredge and got even higher numbers and no one new if it was there or not and especially when everyone (the locals) thought there would be nothing.
I got 100% correct hits and 80%correct on the empty spots, and no one here has X-ray eyes so in my opinion that was more than double blind.
Nature would have known that it was placed there, or not, and no one else except God.
And we will see about that if the IIG can ever answer the questions and accept the protocol.
If not I will see soon enough when I test again.
If you ask me there is more to learn and know because I always question what I am told is the truth and in this case I believe there is a mistake in the knowledge and information.
I have also tested with smaller scale equipment more frequently and am at 99% accuracy and that was done at least 300 times in four years (Pan, sluice box).
And everywhere I went I pulled up gold or metals and seen what I read with the dowsing stick.
If I ever get a fair test it will be amazing.
But I'm not holding my breath.
!0% correct in the jref office. That's one of ten
Up to 60 % in the field doing the double blind test, like in the office.
68% with my tests here and with SezMes' test 90%, given it was only one of ten.
If we ran the other nine the same way it in my opinion would still be around 90%, or better.
Because I ran the test in the field with a dredge and got even higher numbers and no one new if it was there or not and especially when everyone (the locals) thought there would be nothing.
I got 100% correct hits and 80%correct on the empty spots, and no one here has X-ray eyes so in my opinion that was more than double blind.
Nature would have known that it was placed there, or not, and no one else except God.
And we will see about that if the IIG can ever answer the questions and accept the protocol.
If not I will see soon enough when I test again.
If you ask me there is more to learn and know because I always question what I am told is the truth and in this case I believe there is a mistake in the knowledge and information.
I have also tested with smaller scale equipment more frequently and am at 99% accuracy and that was done at least 300 times in four years (Pan, sluice box).
And everywhere I went I pulled up gold or metals and seen what I read with the dowsing stick.
If I ever get a fair test it will be amazing.
But I'm not holding my breath.
This is were we leave the Super-Duper-Absurdity levels on the meter and meet the other end of the spectrum: The simple outright lie, paired with a humongous ignorance and almost no education.
Attachments
GruzKryzt hardly needs my aid, but I couldn't stand by for this.
Edge, you are still missing all the points that have been raised for you.
At the JREF Challenge you got a same-as-chance 10%. All the things you raised afterwards as reasons for failure were there when you did the unblinded trial, and you approved them.
The SezMe test was full of holes which SezMe has admitted.
You claim 80% to 99% success in the field yet you have nothing to show for it. Or do you suddenly have the funds to travel to a test somewhere? Are mining consortiums lining up to hire your services?
Tell me: If I'm standing directly over a sizable vein of detectable ore, how far away do I have to stand before I no longer detect it with the dowsing rod?
Tell me further: Are veins of ore discreet and distinct, i.e., do they end abruptly or does the ground around them carry ore of varying degrees of purity/density/whatever-the-term-is?
You're just like the water dowsers who claim success when a well strikes water where they pointed, failing to admit that a well would find water at some point at nearly any spot in the area.
Those pics prove you were there. Nothing else, edge.
My avatar suggests a lot of things to a lot of people. Usually the nature of the suggestion tells more about the people - who view it and then comment - than about the avatar. It looks like a pagoda in front of the sun, does it not?
You skipped my inquiry in the other thread: When can we except your next appliaction, edge?
SezMe
post-pre-born
The Shadow Knows.
Hopefully the guy who gets asked a simple question: When can we expect your next application, egde?
So what did you find out?
Tell them I'll be passing through town in the next couple of days and would they use the protocol I have with out risk to their money?
In other words test me for free, no risk?
SezMe
post-pre-born
Very interesting, edge. What does "through town" mean? LA? What does "next couple of days" mean? Next week?
If you're going to be in my area (you know my home town) let me know and we can set up a get together via phone or PM.
Definitely maybe.
A simple straight answer, please: When can we except your next application, edge?
Spektator
Is that right?
I expect that except is a typo for expect. There may be aspects I don't suspect, though, so I won't object to your comment on the subject.
Definitely maybe.
A simple straight answer, please: When can we except your next application, edge?
JREf has to wait till the IIG decides or not to do the test.
JREFs call not mine.
They are the ones that canceled, not me.
That's too bad because we were close.
We had about two months to finish on only one or two more issues before I said I would go and test.
They stopped the negotiations at the very last moment, what could have been a minute for them to accept two simple logical reasoning’s.
One is that the placebos should be something that doesn’t interfere with my readings and that I needed to have someone else there that was neutral, to observe what was being recorded.
Or for me to know each time I made a pick if I was right or wrong in my picks.
Pretty simple.
Remember I said I would test in September or October.
So by now we would know.
The IIg is dragging their feet too.
No one want's to lose a bet if there is money involved.
The Pig
Thinker
- Joined
- May 16, 2006
- Messages
- 171
Do you think they're dragging their feet because they think you're going to win the prize? Do you think they believe dowsing works?The IIg is dragging their feet too.
No one want's to lose a bet if there is money involved.
Oh, but we do know:
We do know you are unable to submit a coherent protocol proposal.
We do know that the currently valid laws of physics still apply.
And we do-diddly-ooh know that you talk the talk but de-diddly-efinitely do not walk the walk.
You had USD 1,000,000 as an incentive for doing two simple controlled tests. Did not work.
You should go for the Nobel Prize. Seriously. See if your meanderings win you anything.