Well it is actually and not just that, you don't want to go there, because that test is null and void.
And you are what, a moderator? Shouldn’t you moderate your own post?
For me it was a major experiment that didn't follow the protocols, that's from an insider that talked with Jeff on what they did when placing the targets.
I only found out recently, from another thread; now I know I'm right, and the next test done with SezMe proved it, look those tests up.
The question is can I endure 100 passes, from what I know at about 80 I start to tire.
.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=2722435#post2722435
My other test in the creek in unknown ground using a dredge and snipping proved it again.
17 out of 21 times.
Now with my new protocol redone to perfection was rejected because the container is placed always on the same spot and only the target appears in that spot one of ten times X ten sets.
Because this is what I heard, after I left the room in their office where the first testing was done, they moved my containers slightly after each try so I wouldn't be able to tell where they may have placed the target.
But I was to place the containers where there was a neutral spot, how could it be neutral if moved off my spot? That alone tweaked my results.
Back onto the areas that had the interferences?
I don't think they did that on purpose but it answers my question on the low hits at their office.
What I was looking for at the time was proof that we could get power from the field of the earth; something the tether experiment did later using the shuttle mission, STS75.
I started thinking about this at about 1984/85.
After all my fears were the earth dying from pollution, but are we ready to get off of fossil fuels?
Not to mention what’s going on in the Gulf now!
The earth battery proves this,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmNoLfjIEac
Tesla knew this and there must be a way to get there, what we learned traveling at 17,000 miles an hour was that so much power was produced that it fried the cable to the tether.
There was a flaw in the tether itself, but it worked.
The idea was to let the shuttle drag the tether across the Earth's magnetic field, producing one part of a dynamo circuit. The return current, from the shuttle to the payload, would flow in the Earth's ionosphere, which also conducted electricity, even though not as well as the wire. One purpose of such a set-up might be to produce electric power, generating current to run equipment aboard the space shuttle. That electric comes at a price: it is taken away from the motion energy ("kinetic energy") of the shuttle, since the magnetic force on the tether opposes the motion and slows it down. In principle, it should also be possible to reverse this process: a future space station could use solar cells to produce an electric current, which would be pumped into the tether in the opposite direction, so that the magnetic force would boost the orbital motion and would raise the orbit to a higher altitude.
http://www-istp.gsfc.nasa.gov/Education/wtether.html
Now my next question is can we do that at lower speeds, on the ground?
So now how does this fit in with this thread?
What I was thinking then was if God knew what we would need, since at this time we have fossil fuels, would he allow us to advance away from fossil fuels?
By this I mean that lets say we could would something new like this… draw on that kind of power is it something that could destroy us, is this something we are allowed to do, to find? I only see were we would have a new type of platform to deliver our current weapons.
Or if we had this could we make another weapon of mass destruction something worse than what we already have?
The tether experiment proves we can.
If I am right a small amount of power in produces more work out with extra energy.
If they, (JREF), would have lost that million they would have made a billion.
Seven or eight of the good spots where here where the dredge is in the picture, where I tested in the creek, something else the JREF won’t do.
We are headed to global warming because of all the pollution, and after that the next ice age.
I knew this in 1980/81.
Experimenting is a lot of fun.
