EvilYeti said:
You are correct, the rules do not specifically proscribe libel. Hence the ability for folks like shanek to habitually libel his critics by calling them liars. It only seems fair that in absense of any moderation, others may libel him in return.
Or is there a rule that says only certain posters are allowed to libel, or only certain types of libel are allowed?
Could you clarify please?
Calling someone a liar does not rise to the level of actionable libel. Because name-calling is so prevalent on message boards, calling somone a liar or some other name does not adversely affect one's name and reputation. Claiming that someone is a registered sex offender is actionable libel, because it could damage one's name and reputation. Unless, of course, one has evidence to support that allegation.
The rules here do not specifically prohibit libel. However, libelous statements may be subject to administrator action under Rule 8 and/or Rule 10.
All parties should note that the rules also state that "The JREF is not responsible for the content, opinions, beliefs, or other matters contained in posts on this forum. The opinions expressed are strictly those of the individuals involved, and the JREF assumes no liability for such opinions." If people post material that results in legal action, they can't expect to drag the JREF with them as parties to any legal action.
You've mentioned "absence of moderation"; moderator authority is limited under Rules 5 and 6. So, while I might suggest that a poster revise their statements if they apparently violate Forum rules, it is not within my authority to remove or edit posts, although I have the capability to do so. Moderation is therefore limited to variations of "Hey! Don't do that!" and, of course, applying asterisks to certain cuss words that appear on a limited list.
All that said, I remind everyone that I'm only a moderator, and my opinions do not carry administrative authority. Administrative questions should be addressed to the administrators.
