• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Does CERN prove Einstein wrong?

Anders Lindman said:
Does that include two astronauts, their space suits, and all the moon rocks they brought with them?
Click to expand...

You mean you don't know what "dry mass" means in reference to spacecraft? And you're pretending that you know enough about spacecraft dynamics to tell us the LM's filmed movements are incorrect?

I'll let you wallow in this latest dodge. Clearly you don't know how to get the numbers you need, so clearly you have no basis for judging just how much angular acceleration the LM's RCS could provide under those conditions. No, dry mass does not include crew or cargo, and you could have easily Googled that. You're asking for more information to mask your inability to compute the moment of inertia. I think it's hilarious that you pretend to discuss Einsteinian physics, yet you can't even solve simple problems in Newtonian physics.

As has been made painfully clear, you're entirely clueless regarding most of the facts that relate to your conspiracy theory. And you clearly grasp at just about any straw to keep believing your pet theories.

Put up or shut up. Tell me exactly how much angular acceleration the LM RCS would have had under the filmed circumstances, and show the work you did to arrive at that figure, or else admit that you don't know whether the film is accurate or not.
 
Anders Lindman said:
Yes, in addition to posting on forums like this I sometimes contact experts and ask them about and discuss some of this stuff.
Click to expand...

Do you treat them as discourteously as you've treated the experts here? Do you flatly deny their expertise with no more authority than you say-so?

Name the expert(s) you consulted on the behavior of the Apollo lunar module. As in actual, verifiable names.
 
JayUtah said:
Do you treat them as discourteously as you've treated the experts here? Do you flatly deny their expertise with no more authority than you say-so?

Name the expert(s) you consulted on the behavior of the Apollo lunar module. As in actual, verifiable names.
Click to expand...

I haven't contacted any expert about NASA stuff. They say that the acronym stands for never a straight answer so it's futile to contact them, maybe. ;)
 
So, you believe a wide range of dubious topics based on nothing more than your gut feeling, and doubt a large number of well documented and supported scientific theories/historical events cause you read a contrary statement on the web?

Cheque please!
 
Border Reiver said:
So, you believe a wide range of dubious topics based on nothing more than your gut feeling, and doubt a large number of well documented and supported scientific theories/historical events cause you read a contrary statement on the web?

Cheque please!
Click to expand...

I need some logic in the theories. Such as the Einstein relativity hoax theory. What would the reason be for such a monstrous conspiracy? The answer is that knowledge is power, and by keeping the true knowledge to themselves and giving the rest of the people false knowledge the shadow powers are able to sustain and even increase their power. A kind of insider trading but with scientific knowledge instead of with finances.
 
twinstead said:
This is not the post of a rational, legitimately skeptical person
Click to expand...

I'm not a conspiracy researcher. It would take a lot of effort to check all the facts even if I contacted a lot of experts. And even then I would probably not have the complete truth. Plus it's important to look at the big picture. Focusing too much on just a single conspiracy and many connections within the larger picture will likely be missed. To see the big picture a full-spectrum dominance is needed, not a struggle with a single issue.
 
ApolloGnomon said:
You seem to be using the word "logic" differently than I've encountered it before.
Click to expand...

Maybe the word 'reason' is better here. Is there a valid reason for a conspiracy. And who benefits from the conspiracy? What do the banking elite, who own the world, and who funded both sides in the world wars, benefit from running their own separate branch of science? The answer is that they can use the advanced science and technology to protect their money out of nothing debt scheme!
 
Let's say that the banking elite have vastly more advanced technology than the rest of the world. Then if governments around the world are planning to attack the banking elite because all nations are debt slaves to the international banksters, they'd better think twice. Or else the banking elite will spank their butts!!! :mad::D
 
Anders Lindman said:
Let's say that the banking elite have vastly more advanced technology than the rest of the world. Then if governments around the world are planning to attack the banking elite because all nations are debt slaves to the international banksters, they'd better think twice. Or else the banking elite will spank their butts!!! :mad::D
Click to expand...

Hmm. How's all that working out for "teh banking elite", then?

http://www.sacbee.com/2011/10/07/3967257/threat-of-new-banking-crisis-sees.html

http://money.cnn.com/news/specials/storysupplement/bankbailout/

http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/banklist.html
 
Anders Lindman said:
From a conspiracy perspective there may be four groups of people posting here:...4) Members of the shadow powers.
Click to expand...
Hi. It's me. The "Shadow Powers". Please stop referring to me/us in your posts. We are trying to run a very super sekrit and ebil organization and I/we do not want to be affiliated in any way with the level of non-sense you promote. Thanks in advance...SP
 
Huma said:
Hi. It's me. The "Shadow Powers". Please stop referring to me/us in your posts. We are trying to run a very super sekrit and ebil organization and I/we do not want to be affiliated in any way with the level of non-sense you promote. Thanks in advance...SP
Click to expand...

Hi Huma,

Cool. That's cool. :cool::D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom