• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Ed Does anyone here believe that Princess Diana's car crash was suspicious?

Okay, so I'm
Cleffchin Squarejaw, SAS. I'm ordered by her Majesty to kill Diana and Fayed. I choose Paris. I have all sorts of options to carry out my mission, poisons being the easiest for this kind of job. I could dress as a Serbian, and shoot them with a weapon that traces back to Serbian war criminals. I could just plant a bomb on Fayed's yacht.

But no.

My brilliant plan is to follow their car - into a tunnel - and force it to crash. No car bomb, no ambush. Just run them into concrete supports. The success of my mission hinges on weather Diana is wearing her seatbelt. If she's not, maybe she dies. Maybe.

Okay. Sure. That's a solid plan right there.

Heh, as a Brit, more likely a chinless wonder.


:D :duck::run:


<grin duck runvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvfast>



.
 

Once again, you demonstrate your inability to evaluate claims, or even to read your own links.
The Mishcon Note refers to a note
reportedly taken by Mishcon during a meeting he had with Diana on 30 October 1995.

During the meeting, which also included Diana’s personal secretary Patrick Jephson, Diana
reportedly said that she had heard from a source that efforts would be made to “get rid of her” by April 1996.

The source allegedly told Diana that this would occur via a car accident that would either end her life or injure her so far as to make her appear “unbalanced”.

Note the highlighted.
Then there's this:
“I saw Lord Mishcon about a month before he died, in about the spring of 2005, and he held course to the fact that he thought she [Diana] was paranoid, and he hadn’t held much credence to it.
Then read this, from your own source:
Stevens’ inquiry concluded with “100 per cent” certainty that there was no conspiracy to “get rid of” or murder Diana and that her death was an accident.

Now, put it all together. Do you think this constitutes irrefutable evidence that Diana was murdered? Why or why not?
 
Here's what startled her. These people had been doing origami for decades, had even been paid for doing it...and they STILL didn't know how it worked. (To be fair, maybe it was an advanced pattern.)

To be honest , I could apply it to members of this forum. "You've been studying CT for 20 years... and you are still incorrect."
Any day now, after 28 years, someone's going to turn up with a plausible explanation for this could have been a murder plot. Any day now. Trust me on this. How could anyone doubt it?
 
Here's what startled her. These people had been doing origami for decades, had even been paid for doing it...and they STILL didn't know how it worked. (To be fair, maybe it was an advanced pattern.)

To be honest , I could apply it to members of this forum. "You've been studying CT for 20 years... and you are still incorrect."
Oh we've reached the "if you don't agree with me you're closed minded/stupid" part of the thread.

Why do you ignore the calls for you to provide evidence champ? Is it because you know you don't have any but don't want to admit that you're laughably wrong?
 
In the interest of fairness, I will concede that this isn't like October Surprise (the theory that Reagan stole the election from Carter). That one was just indisputable. Just cut-and-dried. They even admitted to it.

This isn't like that.
 
I provided a ton of information, actually. You just rudely dismissed all of it.

I bet you didn't even watch those videos, either.
Point to anyone rudely dismissing evidence that Diana was murdered.

No, hearsay about her saying she would be killed isn't evidence.

No, claims are not evidence.
 
Here's what startled her. These people had been doing origami for decades, had even been paid for doing it...and they STILL didn't know how it worked. (To be fair, maybe it was an advanced pattern.)

To be honest , I could apply it to members of this forum. "You've been studying CT for 20 years... and you are still incorrect."
We evaluate based on evidence, not rumor and our feels.

You change the subject when you get backed into a corner and refuse to address evidence that proves you wrong.

Nah, we're good.
 

Back
Top Bottom