• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Director of Education at the Royal Society wants Creationism in Schools

And before you go off on the word "respect", it's such a vague word that "respecting" creationism could mean anything; in the context given, they are not respecting it as an idea but merely showing respect to students expressing it, as I understand it. If I'm wrong then I obviously disagree, but a word like "respect" is slippery and people tend to talk past each other or equivocate when using it.
 
Reiss said:
"[FONT=tahoma,verdana,arial]Many scientists, and some science educators, fear that consideration of creationism or intelligent design in a science classroom legitimises them."[/FONT]

Headline attributes this:
"science teachers should treat creationism as legitimate"

This is all too typical of modern journalism. A statement goes in to the press and comes out exactly backwards from what was said, and then the speaker is held accountable for the backwards version. Part of the reason I hardly pay attention anymore.
 
Last edited:
Reiss said:
"[FONT=tahoma,verdana,arial]Many scientists, and some science educators, fear that consideration of creationism or intelligent design in a science classroom legitimises them."[/FONT]

Headline attributes this:
"science teachers should treat creationism as legitimate"

This is all too typical of modern journalism. A statement goes in to the press and comes out exactly backwards from what was said, and then the speaker is held accountable for the backwards version. Part of the reason I hardly pay attention anymore.

And the "skeptics" here buy right into it. Pathetic.

And the Royal Society, too! Disgusting.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom